ライフサイエンスコーパス: advance care planning

1 iritual support, preference for heroics, and advance care planning).

2 s for the needs of caregivers, and timing of advance care planning.

3 research related to decision aids for adult advance care planning.

4 % of participants (n = 43) had not discussed advance care planning.

5 social care underpins a growing interest in advance care planning.

6 aged a diverse sample of homeless persons in advance care planning.

7 help promote more accurate and comprehensive advance care planning.

8 ual support, QOL, treatment preferences, and advance care planning.

9 ty of life (QOL), treatment preferences, and advance care planning.

10 ioner relationship were associated with more advance care planning.

11 their families more than their physicians in advance care planning.

12 gate decision making and documents to aid in advance care planning.

13 ons, setting postoperative expectations, and advance care planning.

14 Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly implemented

15 Engagement in advance care planning (ACP) is viewed as a way to prepar

16 Advance care planning (ACP) may prevent end-of-life (EOL

17 Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their

18 their use in pain, dyspnea, depression, and advance care planning (ACP), and to identify research ga

19 -documented racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning (ACP), we know little about why th

20 beneficial treatment are felt to be improved advance care planning and communication training for hea

21 eholders (> 80%) and perceived that improved advance care planning and communication training would b

22 ication with family, encouraging appropriate advance care planning and decision making, supporting ho

23 ng therapies have made decision making about advance care planning and end-of-life issues more comple

24 t-provider communication issues ("paucity of advance care planning and goals-of-care designation," "m

25 In the base-case analysis, if in-hospital advance care planning and ICU-based palliative care cons

26 provide fact-based information to encourage advance care planning and informed choice.

27 In-hospital advance care planning and palliative care consultation h

28 atic review to answer three questions: 1) Do advance care planning and palliative care interventions

29 ards for clinician patient communication and advance care planning and that payers and care delivery

30 red decision making about treatment options, advance care planning, and attention to physical, emotio

31 collected participant demographics, previous advance care planning, and decision control preferences.

32 ychosocial and religious/spiritual measures, advance care planning, and end-of-life treatment prefere

33 are system pursues rationing, more effective advanced care planning, and augmented capacity to care f

34 h enhanced communication, medication safety, advanced care planning, and enhanced training to manage

35 rts have led to changes in patterns of care, advanced care planning, and symptom control among childr

36 ife throughout the disease course, sensitive advanced care planning, and timely patient-centred end-o

37 d trial of a video-assisted intervention and advance care planning checklist versus a verbal descript

38 the 3 levels of care, CPR/intubation, and an advance care planning checklist.

39 These findings are supportive of advance care planning consistent with the preferences of

40 ety and fear of inaction, and limitations in advance care planning-contribute to communication challe

41 spiritual needs, preference for heroics, and advance care planning (do-not-resuscitate order, living

42 Advance care planning enabled families to understand and

43 should include further research, training of advance care planning facilitators, dissemination and ac

44 cision support tool and patient checklist on advance care planning for patients with heart failure.

45 ity and reduce costs through two mechanisms: advance care planning for patients with life-limiting il

46 ing decision aids as interventions for adult advance care planning found that most are proprietary or

47 were associated with lower expenditures, and advance care planning had no association.

48 The traditional objective of advance care planning has been to have patients make tre

49 Advance care planning honors patients' goals and prefere

50 igned this survey to ascertain the status of advance care planning in this population.

51 There is a need for improved advanced care planning in our hospitals, and to confirm

52 OMMENDATION 5: Clinicians should ensure that advance care planning, including completion of advance d

53 ug users, and less educated individuals need advance care planning interventions in clinical HIV prog

54 ies reporting on ICU admissions suggest that advance care planning interventions reduce the relative

55 uctured intervention in health care and that advance care planning is best viewed as one component in

56 Advance care planning is completed and activated.

57 t there demonstrate how the ordinary lack of advance care planning is deleterious for patients who ar

58 vations suggest that extra effort to address advance care planning is needed for these patients.

59 Deficits in advance care planning leave many patients and their phys

60 Moderate evidence supports advance care planning led by skilled facilitators who en

61 wledge about end-of-life care is needed, and advance care planning must be preceded by education abou

62 effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU admission and length of sta

63 tudy type and quality, patients who received advance care planning or palliative care interventions c

64 t significantly change their diet, exercise, advanced care planning, or cancer screening behaviors.

65 The authors contend that the objective for advance care planning ought to be the preparation of pat

66 tellectual disabilities included problems in advanced care planning (p=0.0003), adherence to the Ment

67 associated consistently with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfactio

68 During advance care planning, physicians should discuss patient

69 Decision aids can support the advance care planning process by providing a structured

70 c physical and emotional symptom management, advance care planning), provided by primary care and car

71 We discuss the importance of advance care planning, provider-patient communication, a

72 Advance care planning responds to these needs.

73 not name the same person for support and for advanced care planning roles.

74 al who provides them with primary support in advanced care planning roles.

75 integration of palliation into cancer care, advance care planning, sentinel events as markers for th

76 vance directives offer only limited benefit, advance care planning should emphasize not the completio

77 Advance care planning should take into account patients'

78 ity of life, symptom burden, survival, mood, advance care planning, site of death, health care satisf

79 in these settings, including innovations in advance care planning, staff training, and systematic ch

80 lude family members in future discussions of advance care planning than wanted to include physicians

81 The most ambitious study of advance care planning, the Study to Understand Prognoses

82 ians and nurses from practice settings where advance care planning typically takes place were surveye

83 Many interventions to facilitate advance care planning were focused on specific treatment

84 in pulmonary rehabilitation are receptive to advance care planning, which is promoted by education on

85 Questions about whom patients involve in advance care planning, whom patients would like to inclu

86 Most patients do not participate in advance care planning with physicians.

87 y-nine percent of patients wanted to discuss advance care planning with their physician.

88 breaking bad news, setting treatment goals, advance care planning, withholding or withdrawing therap