1 tion, although the uncertainties inherent in
audiometric assessment and measurement of hearing-aid be
2 A thorough
audiometric assessment was conducted in 55 healthy women
3 t has clearly defined and frequency-specific
audiometric criteria.
4 Audiometric data and blood samples were collected from t
5 Audiometric data on children aged 6-19 years were obtain
6 Pure-tone
audiometric data was collected on 1033 older females (ag
7 Clinical and
audiometric data were analyzed for treatment naive ears.
8 aced the output signal within the listener's
audiometric dynamic range.
9 hile placing that envelope in the listener's
audiometric dynamic range.
10 Follow-up examinations, including
audiometric evaluation, were performed at 4, 8, 12, 24,
11 Audiometric evaluations demonstrated that the mice displ
12 rveys in question wording and limited use of
audiometric examinations.
13 erans with adult-onset hearing loss and mean
audiometric findings consistent with a mild to severe, s
14 Audiometric findings, complementation group, acute burni
15 dB or greater over at least three contiguous
audiometric frequencies occurring within a 72-hr period.
16 rized overall hearing status consistent with
audiometric guidelines.
17 Audiometric hearing deficits are a common symptom of age
18 ow that while aged rhesus monkeys experience
audiometric hearing deficits similar to that seen in hum
19 and older listeners (10 per group) with good
audiometric hearing participated.
20 in older listeners-even for those with good
audiometric hearing.
21 We tested the hypothesis that
audiometric HI measured in 2013 is associated with poore
22 Of these 10 patients, 7 demonstrated
audiometric improvement, as assessed by pure tone averag
23 poral processing, even in the absence of any
audiometric loss.
24 ecific amplification to compensate for their
audiometric losses, and intelligibility was assessed for
25 quantify self-reporting biases compared with
audiometric measurements.
26 Multimodal neuroimaging studies integrating
audiometric,
neuropsychological, and clinical assessment
27 r assessment to adult unaided listeners with
audiometric profiles ranging from normal hearing to mode
28 urements were compared with anonymized local
audiometric reference data by using the t test.
29 dren in elementary, middle, and high school,
audiometric screening should include low-frequency and h
30 PSIP1 mutation is associated with a peculiar
audiometric slope toward the high frequencies.
31 shold elevation proceeds more rapidly in low
audiometric test frequencies than in high frequencies.
32 , average thresholds across patients at each
audiometric test frequency increase by 6.0 dB hearing le
33 st of verbal auditory working memory, and an
audiometric test.
34 logic referral to confirm the diagnosis with
audiometric testing.
35 hearing loss in older adults using standard
audiometric testing.
36 etric thresholds, and the difference between
audiometric threshold and cochlear gain loss were also i
37 Hearing loss, defined as
audiometric threshold values of at least 16-dB hearing l
38 to be detectable using standard measures of
audiometric threshold.
39 social settings, even when they have normal
audiometric thresholds [1-3].
40 ral dead regions (with matched low-frequency
audiometric thresholds across ears) were also tested.
41 evere neuronal loss correlates with elevated
audiometric thresholds and poor word recognition.
42 generation and its relationship to pure tone
audiometric thresholds and word recognition scores in co
43 ibit degraded temporal resolution, even when
audiometric thresholds are normal.
44 e correlations between TFS-AF thresholds and
audiometric thresholds at low frequencies (125-1000 Hz)
45 The two groups were matched in terms of
audiometric thresholds for frequencies below fe and in t
46 Working memory span, age, and
audiometric thresholds showed no significant association
47 Age,
audiometric thresholds, and the difference between audio
48 ion product otoacoustic emissions and normal
audiometric thresholds.
49 r more with normal or elevated low-frequency
audiometric thresholds.