ライフサイエンスコーパス: consensus on

1 Panellists reached consensus on 11 major criteria for referral: severe phys

2 participants completing both rounds) reached consensus on 42% (n = 46) of 110 items.

3 at the time needed for a population to reach consensus on a color name depends on the region of the v

4 roup of more than 50 stakeholders to develop consensus on a core set of data elements and values esse

5 se the practice of growth monitoring, with a consensus on a few priority target conditions and with i

6 29, 2016), ICHOM led the working group to a consensus on a final recommended standard set.

7 this issue, we did a Delphi study to develop consensus on a list of criteria for referral of patients

8 However, there is still no consensus on a mechanistic model that explains how magma

9 view, surveys, and cohort studies to achieve consensus on a new septic shock definition and clinical

10 cipated in an iterative process to come to a consensus on a revised and simplified clinical diagnosti

11 Life Cycle Initiative is engaged in building consensus on a shared modeling framework to highlight be

12 The Workshop did not achieve consensus on a single primary end-point definition.

13 ns with health outcomes is needed to develop consensus on a standard EO definition.

14 al dosage forms, there is currently no clear consensus on a standard for in vitro drug dissolution st

15 Although there is no consensus on a standardized treatment regimen for CRAO,

16 Despite the absence of consensus on a theory of the transition from supercooled

17 Although there is no clear consensus on a unified hypothesis, it seems likely that

18 There was lack of consensus on access to OPRx in scenarios based on open t

19 Despite broad consensus on Africa as the main place of origin for anat

20 tance of method selection and the need for a consensus on approaches appropriate for particular loads

21 A consensus on appropriate accelerometer thresholds for qu

22 There is no consensus on basic treatment parameters (eg, dose and du

23 However, there is no consensus on biochemical targets of artemisinin.

24 These statements are intended to serve as a consensus on candidate quality indicators for those who

25 The four tools returned poor consensus on candidates (only 20% of calls were with mul

26 e first of an annual series of International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency

27 ncludes 5 basic life support and 1 pediatric Consensuses on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergen

28 ent have been limited, in part, by a lack of consensus on case definitions, standardized diagnostic a

29 and rejection of the scientific community's consensus on central scientific principles.

30 it inferences consistent with the scientific consensus on climate change among conservatives exposed

31 h adequate power and follow-up and require a consensus on composition and dose of nutrient interventi

32 However, there is currently no consensus on confocal FRAP theory, and no efforts have b

33 However, due to the lack of a general consensus on critical characterization parameters, a sho

34 Consensus on definitions and measurement, increased pati

35 However, to achieve this, consensus on definitions of analytical techniques, propo

36 No consensus on definitions of prediabetes exists among int

37 hting relevant missing items but provides no consensus on design and wording preferences.

38 on heart failure (HF) is hindered by lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria.

39 tially curative option; however, there is no consensus on early transplant for standard-risk patients

40 ing studies have, however, so far reached no consensus on either the sign or physical mechanism of El

41 dentifications, there is surprisingly little consensus on exactly how TDA should be applied to minimi

42 This Review provides an up-to-date consensus on exercise management for individuals with ty

43 se scenarios were used to identify and reach consensus on factors important in determining the probab

44 The Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist was used

45 Quality assessment was performed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria instrument (scored

46 There is no consensus on hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in patien

47 previous climate models have provided little consensus on historical and projected trends in coastal

48 most dramatically illustrated by the lack of consensus on how (or even whether) to define bacterial s

49 eatment modalities for AF, there is no clear consensus on how best to treat AF with concomitant HFrEF

50 However, there is no consensus on how best to treat these patients.

51 review, we present the basis for an emerging consensus on how dynamin functions.

52 onal diversity and identity, but there is no consensus on how neuron types should be defined.

53 onformational dynamics (ECD) in catalysis, a consensus on how precisely ECD influences the chemical s

54 The lack of consensus on how the quality of structural alignments mu

55 Further, there is no consensus on how the search for one should be refocussed

56 ange of biomes, there is surprisingly little consensus on how the spatiotemporal patterns of Rs will

57 There is no consensus on how this family of proteins might function

58 been left to users to construct without much consensus on how this should be done, albeit it has been

59 Despite there being consensus on how TMAO and urea affect proteins as a whol

60 s a common clinical problem, yet there is no consensus on how to best manage patients with moderate-l

61 Currently, there is no consensus on how to define chikungunya chronicity.

62 The lack of consensus on how to define macrophage activation in expe

63 -governmental organizations should come to a consensus on how to handle this problem.

64 There is still no consensus on how to manage these patients.

65 nical practice has been limited by a lack of consensus on how to measure it.

66 the life sciences, there has been a lack of consensus on how to practically define DURC; whether it

67 We also summarise the consensus on how to treat testicular germ cell tumours a

68 of consensus documents called International Consensus ON (ICON) are being developed to serve as an i

69 WAO, has decided to propose an International Consensus on (ICON) Pediatric Asthma.

70 To work toward consensus on improving the environment for cardiovascula

71 hospitalization, but there is no established consensus on inhalation therapy--either the type of medi

72 There was good agreement between expert consensus on initial review and reevaluation 4 months la

73 elines, creating a public forum for reaching consensus on interpretation of clinically relevant varia

74 Consensus on items to be included in the criteria.

75 tic model of the enzyme based on the current consensus on its catalytic mechanism and design a series

76 n ice-house world, yet there is still little consensus on its causes, in part because carbon cycle dy

77 boundary is essential for plate tectonics, a consensus on its origin remains elusive.

78 , but biochemical studies have not reached a consensus on its primary enzymatic activity.

79 Most reviewers (74%) reported that reaching consensus on judgments was easy.

80 These provide the rationale for developing consensus on key endpoints and clinical trial design for

81 from completed clinical trials to develop a consensus on key issues in the conduct of clinical trial

82 While there is some consensus on key relationships among their members, on t

83 Here we synthesize the current consensus on landscape approaches.

84 ng number of publications, there is still no consensus on many aspects of HLA-G, including its tissue

85 or barrier to these trials is the absence of consensus on measurement of treatment effectiveness.

86 Reaching consensus on measures and consistency in data collection

87 strategies, attributable in part to lack of consensus on methods of estimation and the importance of

88 andardisation across different settings, and consensus on methods to address confounders will maintai

89 ored the validity of the First International Consensus on Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid (MMP) guidance,

90 There is little consensus on optimal platelet transfusions in either civ

91 tion for major surgery, there remains little consensus on optimal strategies, due to the lack of inst

92 s, spine, and skin and nails), and coming to consensus on optimal treatment recommendations for these

93 ar screening guidelines still exist, with no consensus on optimum screening strategies or treatment t

94 There is still no consensus on outcome measures when reporting on surgical

95 A consensus on outcomes of LIHR when compared with OIHR fo

96 r: 0.559) correlated significantly with the consensus on physician-scored mediator symptoms.

97 nt of LRRK2 kinase inhibitors; however, poor consensus on physiological LRRK2 substrates has hampered

98 This debate has precluded a consensus on physiological mechanisms and on assessment

99 nically important research gaps, and develop consensus on priorities for future research.

100 iological and toxicological studies to reach consensus on probabilities of causation for 15 exposure-

101 provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on proposed modifications to MRI criteria for

102 his approach through discussion; and reached consensus on recommendations regarding updated eligibili

103 The committee reached consensus on report organization and provided written gu

104 Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a

105 tion in the sea over many years, but with no consensus on results.

106 Consensus on robust markers and their conversion to "glu

107 , and clinical features, neither an accepted consensus on routine clinical identification and definit

108 ted participants) was conducted to establish consensus on SAPs.

109 Whereas the 2010 ILCOR Consensus on Science provided important direction for th

110 and summarize the evidence and to provide a consensus on science statement and treatment recommendat

111 Consensus on SDD detection methods is recommended to adv

112 This expert "think tank" reached consensus on several broad directions including: the nee

113 es achievement of collective goals, generate consensus on solutions, and find an effective public pos

114 iculties in the field has been determining a consensus on spectral pre-processing and data analysis.

115 from localized gastric disease, there is no consensus on standard initial treatment of mucosa-associ

116 ess of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for skin imaging in dermatology p

117 ess of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for skin imaging in dermatology p

118 roscopic/robotic nephroureterectomy carry no consensus on templates.

119 recent developments that suggest an emerging consensus on the ability of different cell types to rege

120 However, there is no good consensus on the amount, distribution and alignment of t

121 y of therapeutic proteins, there is no clear consensus on the approaches to identify and validate the

122 However, in liver disease, there is no consensus on the appropriate tests and normal values to

123 dementia severity in relation to driving, no consensus on the assessment of older drivers with cognit

124 As of yet, a clear consensus on the basic surface/interfacial properties of

125 Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best approach for dealing with variabil

126 There is presently limited data and no consensus on the best approach for managing ABO compatib

127 ependence are needed for the bees to reach a consensus on the best nest site.

128 To achieve consensus on the best practices in the management of ven

129 There is no universal consensus on the best staging system for chronic obstruc

130 th conventional chemotherapy and there is no consensus on the best treatment approach.

131 The challenge now is to reach a consensus on the best way to sequence effective treatmen

132 s the first steps to developing a data-based consensus on the biochemical diagnosis of vitamin B-12 d

133 ility of Earth's ecosystems, but there is no consensus on the causal relationships linking these vari

134 he development process was to achieve expert consensus on the clinical and laboratory variables that

135 There is no global consensus on the conduct of clinical trials in children

136 At present, there is no consensus on the conformation of the APP-TM domain at th

137 ctomy early after mild biliary pancreatitis, consensus on the definition of early (ie, during index a

138 To date, there is no consensus on the definition of low expression.

139 earchers and clinicians have lacked a global consensus on the definition of MGD, its epidemiology, pa

140 A consensus on the definition of T- and B-cell recovery, c

141 pertains to framing: generation of internal consensus on the definition of the problem and solutions

142 national collaboration intended to establish consensus on the definition, classification, and assessm

143 Consensus on the definitions of iron repletion and exces

144 There is no consensus on the degree of thoracolumbar flexion to defi

145 ical Care Medicine Program Directors reached consensus on the detailed curricular content and expecte

146 aim of this statement is to report an expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac dysf

147 posed, and until recently, there has been no consensus on the diagnostic criteria or clinical definit

148 on the liver, mediated by PI3 kinase, though consensus on the downstream effectors remains to be reac

149 There is no scientific consensus on the drivers of this slowdown.

150 There is, however, no consensus on the elements that constitute an ideal ACS m

151 ot been reported, and currently, there is no consensus on the endothelial function of individual Pak

152 d composition database organizations reached consensus on the EuroFIR quality framework and started i

153 There is no consensus on the evolutionary relationship between the t

154 Moreover, there is still no consensus on the exact percentage of glenoid loss that r

155 There is no consensus on the exact relationship between these two pr

156 l to reduce carbon capture cost, there is no consensus on the experimental parameters to be used for

157 ntation can influence food web interactions, consensus on the factors underlying variation in the imp

158 To date, there is no consensus on the FM origin in Cu/Cu2O systems.

159 their importance for humans, there is little consensus on the function of antibiotics in nature for t

160 To date, there is still no general consensus on the fundamental principle that governs glas

161 tions (UN) leadership to build international consensus on the future of MRT.

162 Today, new consensus on the genetic and clinical diagnosis of neuro

163 ated from retreating ice sheets, there is no consensus on the geographical source or underlying physi

164 The science of global warming has reached a consensus on the high likelihood of substantial warming

165 ge, and different animal hosts, and no clear consensus on the host range restriction determinants eme

166 Although there is no consensus on the ideal class distribution for training s

167 ed by multiple factors, but there is general consensus on the importance of antibodies that neutraliz

168 There is currently no consensus on the importance of climate change in Mesoame

169 ants vary significantly, and there is little consensus on the importance of this phenomenon.

170 There is poor consensus on the incidence and risk factors for fracture

171 lt kidney transplantation, there is no clear consensus on the incidence of graft failure-due-to nonco

172 ar diagnosis, three of the authors reached a consensus on the indication of SIT and use of allergens

173 city of the other; there is currently little consensus on the latter.

174 neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs.

175 n of carbon in soil is significant, and some consensus on the magnitude of that potential.

176 There is no consensus on the management of leaks complicating GBP, w

177 ors, and the struggle to reach international consensus on the management of migratory species.

178 There are limited data and consensus on the management of the refractory TTP patien

179 The current consensus on the mechanism of these transporters, based

180 Despite an absence of consensus on the mechanism(s) of toxicity, diminishing t

181 This document is the result of a consensus on the mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphyla

182 dating back over 50 years, there is still no consensus on the mechanistic basis for protein aggregati

183 ardiorespiratory fitness, and to the lack of consensus on the MHO definition.

184 However, there is a lack of consensus on the molecular mechanism by which alcohol me

185 l trials whenever feasible given the lack of consensus on the most effective treatment in this settin

186 However, consensus on the most effective way to administer colist

187 the research community has failed to reach a consensus on the nature and significance of the relation

188 Although there is no consensus on the nature of the bosons (or even whether a

189 developed or implemented; however, there was consensus on the need for a well-designed study to obtai

190 d risk factors for neoplasia, so there is no consensus on the need for pouch surveillance.

191 New or modified elements reflected consensus on the need to account for emergency medical s

192 There is consensus on the need to address social determinants of

193 There is expanding consensus on the need to modernize the training of cance

194 T data with variable uptake intervals and no consensus on the number of lesions to be assessed.

195 aught through varying curricula; however, no consensus on the optimal curriculum has been established

196 se component endpoints; however, there is no consensus on the optimal instrument for use in clinical

197 several issues remain and include reaching a consensus on the optimal protocols and appropriate utili

198 tem cell (MSC) therapy; however, there is no consensus on the optimal route of delivery.

199 tem cell (MSC) therapy; however, there is no consensus on the optimal route of delivery.

200 e increasing the use of stem cell therapies, consensus on the optimal stem cell type is not adequatel

201 Purpose There is no consensus on the optimal systemic treatment of patients

202 Despite intense study, there is no consensus on the organization of monomers within Sup35NM

203 etic response but weak lattice character, no consensus on the origin of this transition has been reac

204 ed 2-round Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on the outcomes and case-mix variables to be i

205 However, although there is increasing consensus on the packages and specific interventions tha

206 At present, however, there is no consensus on the phenotypic signature of Bregs, and thei

207 t conditions and fluid properties, without a consensus on the physical mechanisms responsible for the

208 aim of the current document was to propose a consensus on the position and gradual implementation of

209 They reached a consensus on the presence or absence of 6 radiological f

210 ng influenza epidemics means there is little consensus on the probable effectiveness of school closur

211 te this enzyme having been widely studied, a consensus on the reaction mechanism has not yet been fou

212 y makers and researchers is the absence of a consensus on the relation of beverages containing low-ca

213 ves have fundamentally altered a decades-old consensus on the relationships of extinct gnathostomes,

214 The current consensus on the relative importance of beta(2) receptor

215 However, there is no consensus on the relative importance of drainage and imb

216 However, there is no consensus on the relative importance of the various posi

217 To date, however, there is no consensus on the role of the beta-hairpin.

218 lay an important role but there is a lack of consensus on the role of understanding what happened in

219 There is no international consensus on the safe minimum numbers of acute, forensic

220 An expert panel made judgements, and reached consensus on the same scenarios.

221 There is no consensus on the serum vitamin D levels to consider appr

222 than a century of research, there is little consensus on the speed or completeness of this fundament

223 A consensus on the standardization of PCR techniques, alon

224 espite its importance, there is currently no consensus on the statistical analysis of the resulting d

225 No consensus on the strategy for screening, recommended tar

226 ansplant centers use antifungal prophylaxis, consensus on the strategy, choice of antifungal agent(s)

227 cal, neurochemical, and connectional data no consensus on the subdivisions of the adult telencephalon

228 logy), convened a working group to develop a consensus on the syndrome of myocardial ischemia with no

229 r advancing the profession provided there is consensus on the terminology used.

230 Although a consensus on the timing of initiation of treatment, the

231 nditions of truth abandonment and reaching a consensus on the truth.

232 hemical cycling; however, there is a lack of consensus on the uncertainty magnitude.

233 oop superfamily, there is at present neither consensus on the underlying mechanisms, nor predictive m

234 Currently, there is no consensus on the use of (90)Y radioembolization for salv

235 y, reliability, availability, and a national consensus on the use of PLB.

236 The uncertainty arises mainly from a lack of consensus on the use of the sedimentary record as a prox

237 ) has potential merit, but there is no clear consensus on the utility of current strategies.

238 There is currently no clear consensus on the value of SPVL heritability, as multiple

239 LIP study within the context of the emerging consensus on the value of this dietary metric.

240 and molecular dynamics simulations led to a consensus on the voltage sensor movement.

241 topsy practice clearly relate to the lack of consensus on their broader utility as well as to a lack

242 e been a cause of debate for decades, but no consensus on their evolutionary origin or adaptive signi

243 gnostic microbiology, there is no comparable consensus on their handling prior to culture-independent

244 d for fIX binding, however, there is lack of consensus on their location(s), with sites on the A2, A3

245 or prognostic lesions, and there has been no consensus on their risk status.

246 Currently, there is no consensus on their specific physiological role.

247 ndently coded meeting transcripts, achieving consensus on themes.

248 s are hypothesized to be worsened by lack of consensus on theories and methods, by selective publicat

249 -step process, which is in contrast with the consensus on thermostability.

250 sus" when in the literature there is no such consensus on these issues.

251 Results show widespread consensus on these meanings within society and demonstra

252 The lack of strong evidence and expert consensus on these topics has identified gaps in knowled

253 The lack of strong evidence and expert consensus on these topics has identified gaps in knowled

254 The attendees continued to work toward consensus on these topics, and present the key findings

255 facilitate discussion on how best to achieve consensus on this issue by driving the debate forward in

256 However, there is no consensus on this matter.

257 lant function and vegetation dynamics, but a consensus on those mechanisms has yet to emerge.

258 ders was held in September 2016 to develop a consensus on treatment endpoints to guide the design of

259 for primary and safety outcomes, and lack of consensus on treatment parameters.

260 In our opinion, there is a strong need for a consensus on universally accepted measuring techniques o

261 Remarkably, there is little consensus on using the value of MPV in the prognostic ev

262 d modified Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on voting statements and RAND/UCLA Appropriate

263 and in mathematical studies, but there is no consensus on what actually takes place in the ocean.

264 There is no consensus on what constitutes a positive family history,

265 However, there is little consensus on what constitutes nonpredicted stimuli.

266 There is a need to reach a consensus on what constitutes periodontitis for future s

267 To the southeast there is no consensus on what constitutes the northern boundary of t

268 e first years of the millennium there was no consensus on what diarrheal disease vaccines should be d

269 First to develop a consensus on what is known about men's experiences and i

270 of LPB have been proposed, there is still no consensus on what mechanism(s) generate LPB or even on w

271 oadmap for which the first output would be a consensus on what outcome domains are essential for all

272 There is at present no consensus on what produces such orbits.

273 There seems to be no consensus on what the most common properties are, but sc

274 n on treatment response, but there is rarely consensus on what the subjective prior beliefs should be

275 This public consensus on what types of asylum seekers to accept has

276 to identify areas of controversy, as well as consensus, on what is and is not yet known about how cho

277 There is no consensus on when in the fish-tetrapod transition suctio

278 ight chain (AL) amyloidosis, there is little consensus on when reinstitution of chemotherapy should o

279 For example, there is still no consensus on where activated cells lie or on the extent

280 There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sh

281 There is also no consensus on whether tubulin is a peripheral membrane pr

282 sclerosis (ALS); however, there is still no consensus on which biomarkers are reliable prognostic fa

283 ddress this challenge, but there is no clear consensus on which cascade of methods is best suited to

284 There is, however, no consensus on which effects of IOP should be prioritized

285 verse, ranging from 0.01 to 0.4, with little consensus on which factors account for these differences

286 There is no consensus on which HKGs are most stably expressed in end

287 of coercion, and fully informed, there is no consensus on which information should be provided, and h

288 data for trading is unclear due to a lack of consensus on which instruments can be predicted and how.

289 filtration rate (GFR); however, there is no consensus on which is superior for risk classification i

290 However, there is no consensus on which method to use.

291 esentation of spatial knowledge, there is no consensus on which of the two fundamental neural-coding

292 However, there is a lack of consensus on which procedures in children require AMP.

293 There was little consensus on which questions within the population domai

294 Despite intensive research, there is no consensus on which step is rate-limiting for these enzym

295 nd typical participants, and there is little consensus on which tracts are affected.

296 aches consensus, or a mechanism for evolving consensus, on which results should be returned to resear

297 e-care clinics improve outcomes, there is no consensus on who should be referred or the optimal timin

298 It is time to develop an international consensus on who should receive pre-participation screen

299 patients and their families in ICU to reach consensus on withdrawal of aggressive treatment and shif

300 ing patients' use with families to negotiate consensus on withdrawal of aggressive treatment and/or s