ライフサイエンスコーパス: conservative therapy

1 predict spontaneous remission, thus favoring conservative therapy.

2 levels can be reduced in the short term with conservative therapy.

3 ther facility, and she did not to respond to conservative therapy.

4 ld be reserved for patients nonresponsive to conservative therapy.

5 ed in a better relief of symptoms compare to conservative therapy.

6 4%) in the QOL compare to their status after conservative therapy.

7 pared with those initially treated with more conservative therapy.

8 rformed for low back pain without history of conservative therapy.

9 dences with the appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy.

10 admission were compared with those receiving conservative therapy.

11 I) who received either immediate invasive or conservative therapy.

12 ill always be patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.

13 rome and causalgia that did not improve with conservative therapy.

14 ons were required after at least 3 months of conservative therapy.

15 e ways to enhance the effectiveness of these conservative therapies.

16 n all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.

17 ere no different in revascularization versus conservative therapy (30% versus 19%; P=0.06 and 23% ver

18 Treatment typically begins with empiric, conservative therapies aimed at resolving detrusor insta

19 d for patients treated with fibrinolytic and conservative therapies and those who received no treatme

20 ial management: (1) revascularization versus conservative therapy and (2) percutaneous coronary inter

21 Therefore, more conservative therapies are recommended for symptomatic i

22 Although it may resolve with conservative therapy, colonoscopic decompression is some

23 The hematuria resolved with conservative therapy consisting of bed rest and hydratio

24 h continuous positive airway pressure versus conservative therapy (CT) on well-being, mood, and funct

25 When conservative therapy fails, endovascular procedures may

26 atients (including the elderly) receive more conservative therapy for cardiovascular diseases, even t

27 Conservative therapy for fecal incontinence improves con

28 ning, a higher PSA threshold for biopsy, and conservative therapy for men receiving a new diagnosis o

29 e aggressive therapy group compared with the conservative therapy group was 2.5 (95% CI 1.5-4.0).

30 Fluid-conservative therapy has also increased ventilator-free

31 In an effort to preserve renal function, conservative therapy has evolved from complex open surge

32 ould be reserved for those patients for whom conservative therapy has failed.

33 d MR imaging rates for low back pain without conservative therapy in either Medicare or commercially

34 injections followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative therapy in patients with recent-onset oligo

35 Initial treatment should consist of conservative therapy in the form of support or immobiliz

36 Conservative therapy is effective in most donors and sho

37 Fluid-conservative therapy led to a 15% greater decline in ang

38 Conservative therapy may be successful but refractory he

39 e patients were given a choice of continuing conservative therapy, or surgical treatment.

40 The relief of symptoms after conservative therapy predicts better outcomes of surgica

41 Fluid conservative therapy preferentially lowers plasma angiop

42 In patients who are not helped by conservative therapy, recent studies have demonstrated t

43 Formation of new leiomyomas after these conservative therapies remains a substantial problem.

44 Conservative therapies should be used when appropriate.

45 These findings suggest that success of conservative therapy should be considered as an indicati

46 sidered as an indication, and the failure of conservative therapy should not be an indication to surg

47 cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conservative therapy stratified by vessel flow at presen

48 ts who remain persistently nephrotic despite conservative therapy that a more aggressive therapeutic

49 etermine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia

50 o-obstruction who have not had a response to conservative therapy, treatment with neostigmine rapidly

51 Conservative therapy was associated with spontaneous hea

52 In the past, conservative therapy was the only option available to th

53 Patients who improved after conservative therapy were more than 15 times more likely

54 orectal physiology studies, and responses to conservative therapy were reviewed.

55 patient's mobility and daily activities, and conservative therapy with bracing and narcotic analgesic

56 Conservative therapy with diet modification and octreoti