戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 /-0.94) as most important to include in a CR discharge summary.
2 ectively abstracted by certified coders from discharge summaries.
3 le (n=1100) of clinical notes (including 50% discharge summaries and 50% outpatient notes), identifie
4 performance on a subset of randomly selected discharge summaries and outpatient notes.
5  interventions, including computer-generated discharge summaries and using patients as couriers, shor
6 ations performed before MR imaging, hospital discharge summaries, and the field centers at which MR i
7                        The availability of a discharge summary at the first postdischarge visit was l
8 this study were to investigate receipt of CR discharge summaries by PCPs, as well as timing, and sati
9 comes and Measures: Incident AMI (defined by discharge summary documentation, enzyme/electrocardiogra
10                             We obtained 1501 discharge summaries from 1640 (91.5%) patients discharge
11 ding an English-Chinese term dictionary from discharge summaries in the two languages.
12 dies have demonstrated inadequate quality of discharge summaries in timeliness, transmission, and con
13                 PCPs who did not receive the discharge summary in advance of their patient's first po
14                                           No discharge summary included all 7 Transitions of Care Con
15 ormation to primary care physicians and make discharge summaries more consistently available during f
16                                  We analyzed discharge summaries of patients enrolled in the Telemoni
17 ible consenting PCPs, 71 (51.5%) received CR discharge summary, of whom 64 (90.1%) completed the surv
18                                              Discharge summaries often lacked important information s
19 aries, the median hospital dictated 69.2% of discharge summaries on the day of discharge (range, 0.0%
20  care typically received a typed, structured discharge summary, prescription for new medications if i
21               Improvements in all aspects of discharge summary quality are necessary to enable the di
22 wever, degree of hospital-level variation in discharge summary quality for patients hospitalized with
23     Even at the highest performing hospital, discharge summary quality is insufficient in terms of ti
24 ventilator settings, nursing progress notes, discharge summaries, radiology reports, provider order e
25                     Approximately half of CR discharge summaries reach PCPs, revealing a large gap in
26                                    Review of discharge summaries showed 22% of studies are clinically
27 se inpatient or outpatient clinician note or discharge summary stated the term recrudescence.
28 se outcomes was obtained from chart reviews, discharge summaries, the Cleveland Clinic Unified Transp
29  summary quality are necessary to enable the discharge summary to serve as an effective transitional
30 ater positive valence expressed in narrative discharge summaries was associated with substantially di
31 lly or always in 28.9% of hospitals, and the discharge summary was always sent directly to the patien
32 ous admissions to hospital was assessed, and discharge summaries were read.
33                                              Discharge summaries were tracked from the CR program to
34 a bilingual lexicon from English and Chinese discharge summaries with a small seed lexicon.
35                  All PCPs desired to receive discharge summaries, with most wanting it transmitted vi

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。