ライフサイエンスコーパス: effluent

1 and from 167.6 to 216.4 nm in the wastewater effluent).

2 matrices (such as wastewater treatment plant effluents).

3 can be attributed to direct exposure to WWTP effluent.

4 itors in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent.

5 levated brominated DBP concentrations in the effluent.

6 aceuticals, and illicit drugs) in wastewater effluent.

7 effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent.

8 water, and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent.

9 contaminant removal in municipal wastewater effluent.

10 monitored conventionally in the FAVE lumenal effluent.

11 pproach to concentrate the fractions of (1)D effluent.

12 edium-chain fatty acids from lumen to venous effluent.

13 r pollution control plants (WPCPs) in sewage effluent.

14 ct tanks fed by secondary settled wastewater effluent.

15 ocess wetland receiving municipal wastewater effluent.

16 ly treat antibiotics in water and wastewater effluent.

17 n the resistant starch (RS) content of ileal effluent.

18 that allows comprehensive sampling of the IC effluent.

19 to the formation of silver chloride in WWTP effluent.

20 cs may compromise the quality of the treated effluent.

21 rli-producing E. coli in subsurface drainage effluent.

22 sources in PRO, such as secondary wastewater effluent.

23 s and poorer nitrogen removal from biofilter effluent.

24 uent or the molar ratios of Si/N and Si/P in effluent.

25 harges of wastewater treatment works (WwTWs) effluents.

26 tment plants and those subject to wastewater effluents.

27 stems through meat products or environmental effluents.

28 evant exposure in wastewater treatment plant effluents.

29 runoff samples, and 12 municipal wastewater effluents.

30 reatment processes for cleanup of industrial effluents.

31 fy the public health risk posed by livestock effluents.

32 s, and 1.96-5.57 and 2060-2550 ng/L in final effluents.

33 ent primarily via wastewater treatment plant effluents.

34 to Me(O)NPs in streams receiving wastewater effluents.

35 ese SMPs to understand what is in wastewater effluents.

36 tted to aquatic environments with wastewater effluents.

37 th hospital and pharmaceutical manufacturing effluents.

38 lso confirmed in spiked municipal wastewater effluents.

39 and diversity were compared in influents and effluents.

40 Ps to minimize the eutrophication effects of effluents.

41 is drug is prevalent in municipal wastewater effluents.

42 /L for TMPP to 12600 ng/L for TBOEP in final effluents.

43 In WWTP effluent, 1,4-dioxane concentrations varied widely, with

44 Total fipronil concentrations in plant effluent (28 +/- 6 ng/L as fipronil) were within an orde

45 +/- 1.9; 149.7 +/- 289.5, respectively) and effluent (58.5 +/- 29.1; 2.3 +/- 1.4; 70.2 +/- 121.8, re

46 ates (+/-95% confidence interval) of treated effluent (67800 +/- 1500 kmol DSi year(-1)) compared to

47 uced to 0.25 (+/-0.04) MP.L(-1) in the final effluent, a decrease of 98.41%.

48 ing (3.6 Gmol SiO2 year(-1)) from wastewater effluent across the US.

49 We found that effluent addition significantly altered the physicochemi

50 related compounds in raw sewage and in plant effluent after chlorination were statistically indisting

51 ceuticals, and estrogenicity improved in the effluent after the upgrades.

52 The secondary clarifier effluent also showed a 4.38 MLRV in viable coliforms dur

53 ls induced by municipal secondary wastewater effluent amended with elevated Br(-) and I(-) after disi

54 Effluent analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrom

55 nalysis was comparable to that measured from effluent analysis using inductively coupled plasma mass

56 on flow to decrease the strength of the (1)D effluent and a modulation unit that uses trap columns.

57 vironment through wastewater treatment plant effluent and agricultural field runoff.

58 into freshwater wetlands through wastewater effluent and agricultural runoff.

59 istent pharmaceuticals in treated wastewater effluent and in surface water has been frequently report

60 - and citrate-coated 80 nm nAg in aerobic WW effluent and mixed liquor and the related changes in nAg

61 at both reduces concentrations in wastewater effluent and prevents transfer to biosolids.

62 by wastewater infrastructure, the volume of effluent and receiving water mixing environment.

63 e that PRO power generation using wastewater effluent and seawater desalination plant brine may becom

64 igh salinity differences, such as wastewater effluent and seawater desalination plant brine.

65 rogestins have so far been studied in sewage effluent and surface waters.

66 reased NO metabolite content in the coronary effluent and this was prevented by mecamylamine.

67 uary were primarily attributed to wastewater effluent and, to a lesser extent, geese and gull wastes.

68 ere found at part-per-billion levels in WWTP effluents and at part-per-trillion levels in river water

69 ticals are active substances found in sewage effluents and can negatively impact aquatic systems even

70 pollution including mutagens from wastewater effluents and discontinuity by man-made barriers are con

71 tly degrade EE2 in pure lab water, municipal effluents and EE2-spiked synthetic urine.

72 by analyzing a variety of different reactor effluents and feeds.

73 s of dissolved CH4 and CO2 concentrations in effluents and receiving streams at nine WWTPs in Germany

74 biosensor was further explored with real AD effluents and the results did not show significance diff

75 urces (communities, industrial, and hospital effluents) and are recognized as reservoir for antibioti

76 DOM from surface waters, wastewater effluent, and 1 kDa size fractions were adsorbed by GAC

77 tter leachate, wastewater treatment facility effluent, and concentrated river DOM (used as a referenc

78 ry effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent.

79 of North American dairy and beef production effluents, and identify factors that significantly impac

80 d to aquatic environments through wastewater effluents, and their bioaccumulation potential is debate

81 bstantial release of N2O or CH4 in biofilter effluent appears relatively low.

82 reducing ARG-like sequence abundances, with effluent ARG levels of 29, 34, and 74 ppm (198 ppm influ

83 Adsorption to the minerals kept effluent As concentrations <10 mug L(-1) for more than 1

84 mineral precipitation and rapidly decreased effluent As concentrations to <10 mug L(-1).

85 ated surface water, and municipal wastewater effluent) as well as a sodium chloride solution.

86 by wastewater treatment plant and paper mill effluents, as well as livestock production.

87 led several order-of-magnitude reductions in effluent-associated beta-lactamase genes in effluent-sat

88 stewater treatment plant (WTP) influents and effluents at different sites in Switzerland.

89 Twelve were identified and quantified in effluents at summed concentrations of 9.6-21.2 ng/L.

90 Analysis of ileal effluents (at end of small intestine) demonstrated that

91 eating textile wastewater and other impaired effluents because of their great separation performance

92 ere detected at low levels in the wastewater effluents but not in the river water; synthetic DNA cont

93 upport the conclusion that suppression of PD effluent cell immune function in human subjects by stand

94 ional results to transcriptome changes in PD effluent cells.

95 L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent.

96 l core and compared the resulting changes in effluent colloid concentration through multiple sampling

97 tion have enabled direct introduction of the effluent coming from a nanoLC column into the high-vacuu

98 Even though the wastewater effluents contained 75- to 831-fold higher levels of ARG

99 in constructed wetlands to clean wastewater effluents containing IBP and possibly also other micropo

100 For Kraft and mechanical pulp mills, effluents containing less than 20 mg/L BOD5 were found t

101 Disinfected wastewater effluent contains a complex mixture of biomolecules incl

102 ban-related watershed attributes, wastewater effluent contribution, or hydrologic condition.

103 Together, the results suggest that effluent contributions of up to 25% (v/v) to river syste

104 ates under different land covers, wastewater effluent contributions, population densities, and hydrol

105 scharges in three rivers receiving differing effluent contributions: Hockanum R., CT (22% (v/v) efflu

106 of microplastics being released per liter of effluent could result in significant amounts of micropla

107 f analytical techniques to characterize CWTF effluents, covering 90.5% of disclosed compounds.

108 allow better control of the chromatographic effluent density on its route toward and into the ion so

109 e transforming growth factor-beta1 and in PD effluent-derived MCs exhibiting mesenchymal phenotypic c

110 produced more phytoplankton biomass than CAS effluents despite lower N concentrations.

111 to the environment occurs both through WWTP effluent discharge and runoff following land application

112 tant to ecosystem function, especially where effluent discharge results in high nitrogen inputs.

113 only in the area immediately surrounding the effluent discharge.

114 Municipal effluent discharged from wastewater treatment works (WwT

115 are located downstream of treated wastewater effluent discharges.

116 nce, we ultimately evaluated implications of effluent dynamics and retransformation on environmental

117 ant when dealing with such a large volume of effluent even a modest amount of microplastics being rel

118 apenemase blaOXA was dominant in most of the effluents, except for Cyprus and Israel where blaGES was

119 The effluent exiting the second-dimension column was in the

120 For males from both WwTW effluent exposed mothers and dilution water exposed moth

121 minization in roach derived from either WwTW effluent exposed or dilution water exposed mothers.

122 e, a breeding study revealed that roach with effluent-exposed mothers reproduced with an equal succes

123 Effluent-exposed sites contained high concentrations of

124 utical metabolites that were detected in the effluent exposome of fish, 6 were nonsteroidal anti-infl

125 mothers and dilution water exposed mothers, effluent exposure for up to 3 years and 9 months induced

126 here is little information on the effects of effluent exposure on fish metabolism, especially the sma

127 ings provide no evidence for impacts of WwTW effluent exposure on reproduction or gonadal disruption

128 Effluent exposure resulted in widespread reduction (betw

129 contaminants improved following ozonation of effluent filtered with smaller pore size filters, indica

130 s determined in wastewater influent, primary effluent, final effluent, suspended particulate matter (

131 trated to maintain maximum blood flow and an effluent flow of 45 mL/kg/h with 33% predilution.

132 nt contributions: Hockanum R., CT (22% (v/v) effluent flow), E.

133 The separation column effluent flows through the lumen.

134 h (Rutilus rutilus) exposed to a final WwTWs effluent for 15 days.

135 Roach exposed to the effluent for 3 years in this study were able to reproduc

136 e, and a promising biomarker in the dialysis effluent for membrane change in patients receiving PD.

137 In PD effluent from a cohort of 230 patients, miR-21 was highe

138 ot-scale ozonation of a secondary wastewater effluent from a major city in Germany.

139 esults suggest that the input of a mutagenic effluent from a WWTP resulted in a strong increase in pr

140 The ability to detect atmospheric effluent from clandestine methamphetamine manufacture is

141 s that had been exposed to an undiluted WwTW effluent from early life to sexual maturity had altered

142 In effluent from LSLs with an upstream iron main, colloidal

143 function of the immune-competent cells in PD effluent from PD patients.

144 l flux of dissolved silicon (DSi) carried by effluent from the second largest treatment plant by flow

145 ailability in surficial sediments exposed to effluent from two mine sites.

146 acterization tools were used to benchmark 81 effluents from 20 mills across Canada, representing the

147 aromatic amines in six mutagenic wastewater effluents from a chemical-industrial area in Germany, co

148 63 persistent ARG subtypes were detected in effluents from all systems (of 234 assessed).

149 stewater treatment plants (WWTP) receive the effluents from various sources (communities, industrial,

150 ive overview of gene cassette composition in effluents from wastewater treatment facilities across Eu

151 Effluents from wastewater treatment systems contain a va

152 m to up to 8.7% of the total selenium in the effluent, from less than 1.1% in the influent.

153 the capture solvent from infrastructure and effluent gases via microencapsulation provides possible

154 The CH4 exported with discharged effluent, however, accounted for only a negligible fract

155 plish separation of biomass from the treated effluent; however, accumulation of salts in the wastewat

156 ically exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluents (i.e., press disturbance) before experiencing

157 se, or the incidental presence of wastewater effluent in a water source, is common at power plants, r

158 re detected after only a brief period in the effluent in the BRS- column.

159 be excellent targets for source tracking of effluents in downstream environments.

160 Concentrations of U in mesocosm effluent increased after drying and rewetting, but the c

161 ant with each cycle, while phosphorus in the effluent increased by 1 mg/L and 3 mg/L in the first and

162 whereas the reverse was found in wastewater effluent, indicating that humic-like fluorescence is ass

163 trogens in wastewater treatment works (WwTW) effluents induces feminized responses in male fish, incl

164 ally downgradient former domestic wastewater effluent infiltration beds both act as continuous PFAS s

165 trogen standards for discharge of wastewater effluent into aquatic bodies are becoming more stringent

166 he transport of solvent clusters from the LC effluent into the mass analyzer was prevented by a "wavy

167 (BPA) with wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents into surface waters results in deleterious eff

168 Wastewater effluent is a recognized source of N and P to coastal en

169 the basis of the fact that the suppressed IC effluent is pure water.

170 eeply raised, the IPR is washed out, and the effluent is sent to waste via a diverter valve until it

171 of toxic organic pollutants from industrial effluents is a great environmental challenge.

172 Worldwide, ozonation of secondary wastewater effluents is increasingly considered in order to decreas

173 to (i) turbidity and E. coli removal or (ii) effluent levels of turbidity and E. coli.

174 ent technology options specified in the 2015 Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs).

175 ted constituent in the recent steam electric effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) sin

176 ed wastewater characteristics with permitted effluent limits and ambient monitoring limits and capaci

177 to solids, and (iv) dynamics in influent and effluent loading.

178 Effluent loads of some elements contributed significantl

179 a small object with a cometary tail of dusty effluent material.

180 esponses were detected in the presence of an effluent matrix; importantly, in the absence of morpholo

181 inactivation of coliforms in the discharged effluent (Mean Log removal Value (MLRV) = 3.51), accompa

182 rus (MNV) and MS2 bacteriophage in secondary effluent MWW and phosphate buffer (PB).

183 agricultural, and domesticated) and treated effluent (n = 233) was used to generate a fecal library

184 nificantly increased NOx content in coronary effluent (n = 8), but not in the presence of mecamylamin

185 richness are negatively associated with the effluent NH4 -N and BOD5 concentrations.

186 t, requiring some treatment plants to reduce effluent nitrogen concentrations.

187 rther tested and applied in the influent and effluent of a wastewater treatment plant.

188 racterize peaks detected in the influent and effluent of a WWTP.

189 Thereafter, the effluent of adsorption column, with lower dye concentrat

190 Measurement of the "protein" content in the effluent of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor was then ca

191 ion products in the urine, plasma, and ileal effluent of healthy volunteers and ileostomists (subject

192 tion technique for the analysis of the final effluent of six wastewater treatment facilities.

193 The gaseous effluent of the extraction chamber is immediately transf

194 The effluent of the flow line supplies diluted samples with

195 found in indoor dust and treated wastewater effluent of the station.

196 -equivalent/L (ng Dex-EQ/L) in the secondary effluents of four wastewater treatment plants.

197 s was demonstrated in local tap water and in effluents of sewage plants.

198 than 1 ng/L) or below the detection level in effluents of WTPs and river water.

199 eatment systems and the impact of wastewater effluent on benthic invertebrate communities in arctic r

200 ctive solutions for the effects of pulp mill effluents on fish reproduction.

201 uppressor cell to desalt the chromatographic effluent online prior to the electrospray mass spectrome

202 rs was not detected in either the wastewater effluent or river samples.

203 ed the Si load of a large wastewater plant's effluent or the molar ratios of Si/N and Si/P in effluen

204 For the treatment of industrial effluents or minimizing their detrimental effects, preve

205 Further reductions of final effluent organic loadings toward the target of less than

206 um, were optimized as sorbents for secondary effluent organic matter (EfOM) including emerging microp

207 Effluent organic matter (EfOM), contained in treated mun

208 d WWTPs influx and pre- and postdisinfection effluent over 24 h, followed by incubation experiments l

209 his Article, we demonstrate the influence of effluent particles (in the range of <50 mum) on ozone de

210 ocytes isolated from the peritoneal dialysis effluent (PDE) of noninfected uremic patients.

211 Ex-vivo stimulation of PD effluent peritoneal cells increased release of interleuk

212 OWR was first treated with phospholipid, the effluent pH remained at approximately 6.5 and the averag

213 Construction of dairy effluent ponds would minimize sources connected to water

214 wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent, effluent, primary sludge, and secondary sludge matrices

215 ewage from storm tank discharges and treated effluent processed by a UV-disinfection plant following

216 estuarine bioassays, predenitrification BNR effluents produced more phytoplankton biomass than CAS e

217 Effluent quality and benthic impacts were monitored in t

218 rily to differences in effluent volume, with effluent quality and receiving water hydrodynamics playi

219 d that investment in MWWTP upgrades improved effluent quality and was associated with an immediate ch

220 ent plants (WWTP), ozonation can enhance the effluent quality by eliminating organic micropollutants.

221 assess whether upgrades designed to improve effluent quality could also remediate the intersex previ

222 e of intersex remains unknown, indicators of effluent quality including nutrients, pharmaceuticals, a

223 sh downstream of the Waterloo MWWTP (poorest effluent quality) suggested that approximately 15.5% of

224 duced suspended biomass growth decreased the effluent quality.

225 on of trace organic contaminants (TrOCs) and effluent-quality parameters.

226 entration of organic selenium species in the effluent, relative to influent water, and the fraction o

227 dy thus reveals that ozone treatment of WWTP effluent results in the oxidation of Ag2S and, hence, an

228 t of blaOXA and blaGES genes in the European effluents revealed similar trends to those displayed in

229 fficiency of WW ozonation, by increasing the effluent's ozone demand and decreasing contaminant degra

230 Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of a 200 mL effluent sample showed the best performance using a mixt

231 In addition, 78, 74, and 72% of effluent samples for the concrete, 5 gal, and 2 gal filt

232 Final effluent samples from 10 southern California (United Sta

233 of 69 elements in digested sewage sludge and effluent samples from 64 municipal wastewater treatment

234 ter reservoir and wastewater treatment plant effluent samples had an oxidative flux of 0.015 +/- 0.00

235 ompounds found in wastewater treatment plant effluent samples possessed a negative log D (pH 7) value

236 e using technical replicates of influent and effluent samples taken from an ozonation process during

237 the "protein" concentration in the different effluent samples, with or without spiked additions of Bo

238 effluent-associated beta-lactamase genes in effluent-saturated soils, suggesting marginal persistenc

239 urrence at 12-31 ng/L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and

240 iffered, suggesting that management of these effluents should be tailored appropriately.

241 and detection of nano-size aggregates in the effluent show that the solubilization is based on a sub-

242 ON additions from wastewater treatment plant effluents significantly increased the activation energie

243 acidic waters should be avoided to minimize effluent silver concentrations and preserve silver treat

244 Effluent silver levels fell below the drinking water sta

245 ounting for fractions sorbed in influent and effluent solids may cause slight underestimation of cipr

246 devoid of benthic fauna up to 580 m from the effluent source in response to sediment anoxia.

247 communities (<225 m linear distance from the effluent source) in four out of the five communities (Gr

248 ozonation on the short-term toxicity of WWTP effluent spiked with nano-Ag2S.

249 wing to the expense of removing CO2 from the effluent stream.

250 has been proposed that livestock production effluents such as wastewater, airborne dust and manure i

251 gly increased Al and Fe concentration in the effluent suggested that soil colloids facilitated the re

252 gher concentrations of OXO-LMG in wastewater effluent, suggesting its formation in the wastewater tre

253 This approach will produce effluent suitable for anammox even under winter conditio

254 To produce effluent suitable for anammox, real municipal wastewater

255 wastewater influent, primary effluent, final effluent, suspended particulate matter (SPM), and sludge

256 Recycled fiber mill effluents, tested for the first time, were found to have

257 estrogenic effects persisted in the treated effluent that may still be environmentally relevant.

258 BAC system treating two nitrified wastewater effluents, this study characterized the effect of differ

259 sing X-ray microtomography (XMT) and collect effluent to assess the individual mineral dissolution.

260 t technologies to treat municipal wastewater effluent to meet existing drinking water quality standar

261 00 kg/y of imidacloprid contained in treated effluent to surface waters nationwide.

262 n 2013, with some facilities discharging all effluent to surface waters.

263 Effluent treatment systems across all production types w

264 rporating deposit-feeding invertebrates into effluent treatment systems, particularly when the sedime

265 microbial-driven sediment-based aquaculture effluent treatment systems.

266 presenting the major pulping, bleaching, and effluent treatment technologies.

267 m cannot be sustainably solved with advanced effluent treatment.

268 Wastewater treatment facility effluent, turkey litter leachate, and concentrated river

269 reamwater, and wastewater treatment facility effluent) under normal-flow and flood conditions.

270 antithrombin was largely undetectable in the effluent unless Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro (GPRP) was added to bloc

271 indicated by the pH and conductivity of the effluent urine.

272 s was attributed primarily to differences in effluent volume, with effluent quality and receiving wat

273 ge concentration of FeTot and SO4(2-) in the effluent was >/=20 and >/=30 mg/L, respectively.

274 ation of dissolved (nonparticulate) Ag in WW effluent was 0.89 +/- 0.05 ppb at 168 h and was 71% lowe

275 Initially, the effluent was concentrated by ultrafiltration, reaching a

276 The DMS effluent was directly coupled to a mass spectrometer to

277 The softening effluent was dominated by an Exiguobacterium-related pop

278 Secondary effluent was filtered through different pore-size filter

279 For biofouling tests, wastewater effluent was inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and

280 DITP effluent was Si-limited and this Si-limitation is reflec

281 The concentrated effluent was then enzymatically hydrolyzed, aiming at ob

282 ce of curli-producing E. coli in soil column effluents was greater (P < 0.05) when manure was surface

283 bola virus genetic material in the spent RRT effluent waste.

284 stable in Call's Creek surface water, while effluent wastewater readily destabilizes rGO.

285 sediments by untreated or partially treated effluent water can affect the quality of ecosystem.

286 The CH4 concentration in the effluent water was linearly related to the organic load

287 Arsenic concentrations in the effluent were also significantly lower than the influent

288 Cd concentrations in the effluent were below the Cd MCL, even for sediments witho

289 Wastewater influents and effluents were collected during the youth festival (appr

290 toxicity of the O3/BAC-treated chloraminated effluents were comparable or slightly higher than those

291 While wastewater effluents were dominant sources of TONO and their precur

292 low molecular weight SMPs (MW< 580 Da) from effluents were optimized.

293 a lesser degree, nutrient removal wastewater effluents were the dominant source of NDMA and its chlor

294 Ps) enter estuaries via wastewater treatment effluents, where they can inhibit microorganisms, becaus

295 hence, an increase of the Ag toxicity in the effluent, which may become relevant at elevated Ag conce

296 r disinfection of municipal wastewater (MWW) effluent while the use peracetic acid (PAA) has been pro

297 ing nitrosamines from the absorber waterwash effluent with activated-carbon sorbents was developed to

298 pharmaceuticals entered the system via WWTP effluent with relatively stable loadings across sampling

299 alve-based approach enables dilution of (1)D effluent with weak solvent prior to transfer to the (2)D

300 All filters produced effluents with a mean turbidity of <0.6 nephelometric tu