ライフサイエンスコーパス: empathy

1 rietal junction would be required to disrupt empathy).

2 l underpinnings of individual differences in empathy.

3 to others' distress, and a lack of guilt or empathy.

4 ocessing others' rewards is related to trait empathy.

5 regions involved in cognitive and emotional empathy.

6 on expression of affect, understanding, and empathy.

7 nagement of patients with impaired emotional empathy.

8 I review how focal lesions affect emotional empathy.

9 l affect recognition, social perception, and empathy.

10 icated in social understanding and cognitive empathy.

11 gical explanations evoked significantly less empathy.

12 disorders, which could increase clinicians' empathy.

13 elf-reported measures of autistic traits and empathy.

14 in the evolution of social cognition such as empathy.

15 compared with patients with intact affective empathy.

16 es, may help to clarify the origins of human empathy.

17 important to parenting are those involved in empathy.

18 sychiatric diagnoses, social engagement, and empathy.

19 elopmental psychology as well as research on empathy.

20 prosodic comprehension had spared affective empathy.

21 lly intact inpatients on a test of affective empathy.

22 s and may thereby promote both imitation and empathy.

23 to experience negative emotions), but not to empathy.

24 essed enormous growth in the neuroscience of empathy.

25 riables in medicine and to improve physician empathy.

26 s, which differences are also known of human empathy.

27 t and behavior than individuals low in trait empathy.

28 of citalopram varied as a function of trait empathy.

29 n recognition, decision-making, morality and empathy.

30 IFG, SRC, and STS were related to cognitive empathy.

31 th networks is strongly related to cognitive empathy.

32 etworks contribute to multiple components of empathy.

33 he precentral gyrus was related to affective empathy.

34 cry are pervasive, automatic, and facilitate empathy.

35 at spans from neural anatomy to language and empathy.

36 ly relevant emotional process-other-oriented empathy.

37 ndividuals suggest that chimpanzees may feel empathy.

38 ience of another's pain is characteristic of empathy.

39 ies, but not its sensory qualities, mediates empathy.

40 ide an essential functional architecture for empathy.

41 omical correlates of cognitive and affective empathy.

42 not regions involved in cognitive control or empathy.

43 enues for examining the neural substrates of empathy.

44 rning experiences are sufficient to increase empathy.

45 ve processes, such as perspective taking and empathy.

46 d positively with individual levels of trait empathy.

47 ough an implicit kinematic process linked to empathy.

48 condition including gullibility and impaired empathy.

49 social learning, which is predicted by trait empathy.

50 re specific, brain targets for studying pain empathy.

51 o interpret other's behavior and potentially empathy.

52 2 to 42.6; Delta = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.6); empathy (116.6 to 121.2; Delta = 4.6; 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.0

53 ptoms would affect mental health clinicians' empathy--a crucial component of the relationship between

54 scattered studies of patients with impaired empathy after stroke and other focal injury, but these s

55 d sharing among humans is often motivated by empathy and accompanied by a sense of satisfaction.

56 ontinuer statement, which is one that offers empathy and allows patients to continue expressing emoti

57 is thought to correlate with higher forms of empathy and altruistic behavior.

58 suggest that those who increased the most in empathy and altruistic behaviors, and who decreased the

59 Factor analyses showed that empathy and apathy are distinct constructs, but that aff

60 Here we administered self-report measures of empathy and apathy-motivation to a large sample of healt

61 led behavioural assessment, with measures of empathy and awareness, were included.

62 simulation and memory can play in fostering empathy and begin to offer insight into the underlying m

63 ggesting that microstructural features of an empathy and body-related network are crucial for underst

64 behaviour is motivated, at least in part, by empathy and concern for the welfare of others (hereafter

65 s, altruism is motivated at least in part by empathy and concern for the welfare of others.

66 t equivalent neural functions are engaged by empathy and direct emotion experiences remains to be dem

67 We explore the practice of empathy and discuss an approach for physicians to maximi

68 behavioural task to measure state affective empathy and emotion recognition.

69 are distinct constructs, but that affective empathy and emotional motivation are underpinned by the

70 ersonality disorder characterised by lack of empathy and guilt, shallow affect, manipulation of other

71 nd ToM are distinct components; however, ToM empathy and intention subcomponents might share some fun

72 chanisms underlying altruism remain unknown, empathy and its component abilities, such as the percept

73 proach and theoretical insights for studying empathy and its dysfunction.

74 chanism of action representation that allows empathy and modulates our emotional content.

75 ations for disorders associated with reduced empathy and motivation as well as the understanding of t

76 ion of complex social behavior, particularly empathy and parenting.

77 ng the distress of others can result both in empathy and personal distress.

78 or donations were reflected in participants' empathy and perspective taking responses in a separate f

79 Empathy and previous trauma exposure (personal and whils

80 of prosocial behaviors, but the link between empathy and prosocial behavior is still unclear.

81 elationship to behavioural change, levels of empathy and self-awareness.

82 reported that their children expressed more empathy and sensitivity for justice in everyday life tha

83 f their household, and parent-reported child empathy and sensitivity to justice.

84 iminished in bvFTD that might be relevant to empathy and social behavior.

85 rs, and children, and the children had lower empathy and social engagement levels.

86 ion of the oxytocin receptor relates to both empathy and stress profiles.

87 wo key social processes related to oxytocin: empathy and stress reactivity.

88 For instance, research on empathy and the arts suggests that the psychological pro

89 Both empathy and the imitation of an emotionally communicativ

90 te highly specific roles of AI for affective empathy and TPJ for cognitive perspective taking as prec

91 r reduce negative emotions, which can reduce empathy and willingness to help.

92 sonal (e.g. depression), interpersonal (e.g. empathy), and emotion regulation skills measures (e.g. e

93 ts of mindfulness, psychological mindedness, empathy, and affect consciousness are shown to partially

94 e and neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy, and how they contribute to the management of pa

95 iations between depression, autistic traits, empathy, and likelihood of suicidal ideation and suicide

96 chrony, primary intersubjectivity, emotional empathy, and mirror neurons; and it is associated with o

97 hic functioning that encompassed motivation, empathy, and other psychological characteristics.

98 rom social psychology studies on mimicry and empathy, and recent empirical findings from the neurosci

99 eases affiliative behavior, including trust, empathy, and social reciprocity.

100 These results identify empathy, and social skills more generally, as previously

101 well as by motivating cooperation, charity, empathy, and spite.

102 s of an error with quality of life, burnout, empathy, and symptoms of depression were determined usin

103 order) groups: imitation, biological motion, empathy, and theory of mind.

104 anisms through which learning interacts with empathy, and thus provide a neurobiological account for

105 on to OT-pathway genes, including parenting, empathy, and using social relationships to manage stress

106 phenotypes, such as maternal sensitivity and empathy, and with neuropsychiatric disorders associated

107 The neural processes underlying empathy are a subject of intense interest within the soc

108 Personal distress and decreased empathy are also associated with increased odds of futur

109 s, yet the neural mechanisms that facilitate empathy are unclear.

110 ttribution bias, aggressive fantasizing) and empathy as potential mediators.

111 endent variables and error rate on emotional empathy as the dependent variable to test a predictive m

112 exhibited lower behavioral and dispositional empathy, as measured by the "Reading the Mind in the Eye

113 ontext, share Power in the interaction, show Empathy, ask about Concerns or fears, and work to develo

114 others, which increases rapport, liking, and empathy between interaction partners.

115 more positive caregiving experiences through empathy-building interventions and enhanced understandin

116 Empathy builds trust and is a potent motivator.

117 tudies have investigated the neural basis of empathy, but few corroborative human lesion studies exis

118 cation predicted the error rate in emotional empathy, but only percentage damage to the uncinate fasc

119 re known to exhibit behaviours suggestive of empathy, but the development and maintenance of these tr

120 there is a critical level of concern, i.e., empathy, by the sick individuals above which disease is

121 Thus, it is crucial to understand how empathy can be learned and how learning experiences shap

122 es for altruistic decision-making (affective empathy, cognitive perspective taking, and domain-genera

123 ions for the emergence of inequity aversion, empathy, compassion, and egalitarian moral values via th

124 mplex affective processing task including an empathy component.

125 Affective empathy consists of the affect produced in response to s

126 As a model of empathy deficits, we used the well-established suppressi

127 Surprisingly, children with higher empathy demonstrated lower calculation skills.

128 cumulating evidence indicates that emotional empathy depends on coordinated functions of orbitofronta

129 They provide further evidence that empathy does not only rely on automatic processes, but i

130 Self-report showed decreased empathy during placebo analgesia, and this was mirrored

131 Neurohemodynamic response to empathy-eliciting dynamic scenarios revealed by function

132 ter understanding of the neural responses to empathy-eliciting stimuli in psychopathy is necessary to

133 ther such shared activations imply that pain empathy engages similar neural functions as first-hand p

134 Deficits in empathy enhance conflicts and human suffering.

135 behavior was heavily influenced by affective empathy exhibited higher predictive accuracies for gener

136 observations suggested that a primal form of empathy exists in rodents.

137 ation that individuals high in dispositional empathy experience these physiological changes more quic

138 The patients with ALS showed reduced empathy (Fantasy scale) and increased behavioural dysfun

139 al in turn predicts a subsequent increase of empathy for a different out-group member (generalization

140 Empathy for another's physical pain has been demonstrate

141 oparietal junction [TPJ]) encoded trial-wise empathy for beneficiaries, whereas the TPJ (but not AI)

142 making, supporting home care, demonstrating empathy for family emotions and relationships, and atten

143 This work demonstrates that empathy for others depends upon a distributed network of

144 Previous human imaging studies focusing on empathy for others' pain have consistently shown activat

145 e cortex (ACC) are thought to be involved in empathy for others' pain.

146 Empathy for pain activates brain areas partially overlap

147 erior frontal gyrus, regions associated with empathy for pain in previous studies.

148 ial neuroscience has consistently shown that empathy for pain recruits brain areas that are also acti

149 Subjective and neural measures of pain and empathy for pain were collected using self-report and ev

150 Using fMRI, we found that the 'empathy for pain' network was involved in encoding harmf

151 iew that self-nociception is involved during empathy for pain, and demonstrate the possibility to use

152 ng placebo analgesia also reported decreased empathy for pain, and this was associated with reduced e

153 sociated with shared activations in pain and empathy for pain.

154 sulted in a corresponding "normalization" of empathy for pain.

155 r this results in a concomitant reduction of empathy for pain.

156 e of pain, to test whether this also reduces empathy for pain.

157 ore domain-specific than ACC when processing empathy for pain.

158 ress might be responsible for the absence of empathy for the pain of strangers.

159 research areas to the "end in mind" through empathy for the real-life problems embodied in the perso

160 process, focusing especially on the role of empathy for the victim of a harmful act.

161 is unsatisfactory, with a perceived lack of empathy from professionals and a shortage of stimulating

162 ference to the implusivity and interpersonal empathy gaps in decision-making.

163 d emotional skills, including expressions of empathy, has received scant attention in other primates

164 Impairments in emotional empathy have been mostly studied in neurological disease

165 The neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy have been widely studied with functional imaging

166 echanisms underlying affective and cognitive empathy have garnered intense interest.

167 Although signs of empathy have now been well documented in non-human prima

168 Other predictions from the empathy hypothesis have rarely been tested, however, owi

169 of chimpanzees lends further support to the empathy hypothesis in that consolation occurred dispropo

170 In line with this empathy hypothesis, chimpanzee consolation has been show

171 able to test a predictive model of emotional empathy in 30 patients with acute ischemic right hemisph

172 colleagues in this issue of Neuron evaluates empathy in a unique population--individuals with congeni

173 Thus, the study of empathy in animals has started in earnest.

174 implicated in decision making, morality and empathy in boys with callous-unemotional conduct problem

175 d to self-reports of cognitive and affective empathy in daily life.

176 n for stimulating a feeling of closeness and empathy in its users.

177 hermore, we assessed dispositional levels of empathy in observers to determine how empathy might be r

178 f basic human qualities such as kindness and empathy in staff and, at service level, the extent of lo

179 which may reflect poor affect reactivity and empathy in the presence of hyperactive executive control

180 Callous traits index lack of empathy in these children and confer risk for adult psyc

181 icates that hens show no basis for emotional empathy in this context.

182 expression of emotional contagion (a form of empathy) in strangers of both species.

183 A multifaceted construct, empathy includes a prosocial motivation or intention to

184 Cognitive empathy includes mentalizing skills such as perspective-

185 The broad construct of empathy incorporates both cognitive and affective compon

186 rs such as social network size, anxiety, and empathy independently contributed to loneliness, only ba

187 Empathy-induced altruism derives its strength from the e

188 nges the reward value of social stimuli, and empathy influences the extent of this change.

189 ex picture where selected ToM subcomponents (empathy; intention) showed a relationship to specific EF

190 s lesion studies have provided evidence that empathy involves dissociable cognitive functions that re

191 Empathy is a complex social behaviour mediated by a netw

192 A marked lack of empathy is a hallmark characteristic of individuals with

193 Empathy is a key component of our ability to engage and

194 Emotional empathy is a multifaceted and multilayered phenomenon wh

195 Empathy is an ideal candidate mechanism to underlie so-c

196 Empathy is an important component of human relationships

197 Animal empathy is best regarded as a multilayered phenomenon, b

198 -groups and tested whether and how out-group empathy is boosted by a learning intervention.

199 nal systems can help to delineate how primal empathy is constituted in mammalian brains.

200 Empathy is fundamental to human relations, but its neura

201 Empathy is more effective than risk-aversion because whe

202 However, although empathy is often thought to be automatic, recent theorie

203 in humans [1] and mice [2]; in both species, empathy is stronger between familiars.

204 These findings suggest that empathy is, in part, based on shared representations for

205 mice to display emotional state-matching, an empathy-like behavior.

206 methodology sufficiently sensitive to detect empathy-like responses previously, observer hens showed

207 Severe empathy loss is a common feature of frontotemporal lobar

208 ge in support of the proposal that affective empathy--making inferences about how another person feel

209 n together, these findings suggest that pain empathy may be associated with neural responses and neur

210 rds are processed in the brain and vary with empathy may be key for understanding disorders of social

211 perimental studies on our closest relatives, empathy may be the main motivator of prosocial behavior.

212 We argue that impairments in cognitive empathy may reduce the repeated game effect on trust aft

213 nd the ability for sympathetic regulation of empathy may represent both potential gains and losses fr

214 The dynamics of the empathy mechanism agree with predictions from kin select

215 ease of the stressed cagemate, suggesting an empathy mechanism.

216 els of empathy in observers to determine how empathy might be related to the degree of stress contagi

217 etween the individual and art (e.g., through empathy) might be a useful avenue for further considerat

218 nterior cingulate, brain areas implicated in empathy, moral processing, and introspection, are potent

219 lus plays an important role in the emotional empathy network.

220 ed to alterations in the (social) reward and empathy networks.

221 zed by impairments in social functioning and empathy, occur more commonly in males than females.

222 inform recent studies of decreased societal empathy, offer mechanisms and solutions.

223 Empathy often involves coactivations in further networks

224 o people's more general propensity to engage empathy or perspective taking can inform training progra

225 Finally, the evolution of empathy, or emotional awareness, might have a neural bas

226 d that extra information such as reputation, empathy, or spatial structure is needed for fairness to

227 n all elements of interaction with patients: empathy, organization, and verbal and nonverbal expressi

228 01), inertia (p<0.001), loss of sympathy and empathy (p=0.008), repetitive behaviours (p<0.001) and d

229 treatment expectation, reward processing and empathy, paired with increased activation in attention-r

230 terior insula, supporting the view that pain empathy partly relies on neural processes engaged by sel

231 inhibition, apathy/inertia, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative/compulsive behaviours, hyperorali

232 nisms underlying altruistic decision-making (empathy, perspective taking, and attentional reorienting

233 Empathy plays an important role in human social interact

234 on-related mu suppression and on theories of empathy pointing to the importance of discriminating sel

235 of three emotional motivators - feelings of empathy, positive affect, and relational closeness.

236 rceived emotional effects (eg, prosociality, empathy, psychotherapy), but surprisingly little researc

237 ese are two dimensions, measurable using the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the Autism Spectrum Quotient (

238 re empathic participants, as measured by the empathy quotient (EQ), were better facial imitators and,

239 systemizing were assessed using the Combined Empathy Quotient-Child (EQ-C) and Systemizing Quotient-C

240 1), perspective taking subscale of physician empathy (r = 0.31, P < .001), burnout (emotional exhaust

241 Empathy refers to the ability to perceive and share anot

242 Both sexes exhibited empathy-related activation in pain-related brain areas (

243 we used the well-established suppression of empathy-related brain responses for the suffering of out

244 known about the ontogeny and consistency of empathy-related capacities in other species.

245 The enhancement of empathy-related insula responses by the neural predictio

246 Empathy-related insular and cingulate activity may refle

247 e learned and how learning experiences shape empathy-related processes in the human brain.

248 interplay between various skills, including empathy-related responding.

249 However, these empathy-related responses were significantly reduced in

250 This has been interpreted as evidence that empathy relies upon neural processes similar to those un

251 ustments in focus, and the future promise of empathy research if these trends continue and expand.

252 y; P=.02 and P=.01 for emotive and cognitive empathy, respectively).

253 edict more (e.g., narcissism) or less (e.g., empathy) revenge, with the opposite pattern for forgiven

254 ecognizing emotional expressions, as well as empathy, risk taking, impulsivity, behavior change, and

255 Mind in the Eyes" Test and an other-oriented empathy scale.

256 al gyrus correlated significantly with total empathy score (P < 0.05 after whole-brain correction for

257 Empathy score correlated positively with the volume of r

258 nd ACC activation correlated with individual empathy scores.

259 Together, the present results suggest that empathy seems to rely on neural processes that are (part

260 Individuals high in trait empathy showed stronger effects of citalopram on moral j

261 ions in this network should be evaluated for empathy, so that deficits can be addressed.

262 reportedly because it increases feelings of empathy, sociability, and interpersonal closeness.

263 eading to changes in personality, behaviour, empathy, social conduct and insight, with relative prese

264 l of imitation) and high-level (mentalizing, empathy) sociocognitive processes.

265 Theories of empathy suggest that an accurate understanding of anothe

266 indicate potential novel biomarkers of trait empathy, suggesting that microstructural features of an

267 t well-being is socially attractive, whereas empathy supports close relationships.

268 ion of memes and the mirror neuron system to empathy, sympathy, and cultural influences on the develo

269 ructures predicts error rate in an emotional empathy task after acute right hemisphere ischemic strok

270 uncinate fasciculus lesions in the emotional empathy task.

271 form better on tests of social cognition and empathy than men.

272 n MDMA (0.75 mg/kg) had greater proximity to empathy than placebo.

273 Empathy - the capacity to understand and resonate with t

274 Empathy, the ability to vicariously experience and under

275 Using empathy, the awareness and understanding of other people

276 d frontotemporal dementia, disrupt emotional empathy-the ability to share in and make inferences abou

277 Emotional empathy--the ability to recognize, share in, and make in

278 Empathy--the ability to share the feelings of others--is

279 Empathy--the capacity to understand and resonate with th

280 rall, given the link between consolation and empathy, these findings help elucidate the development o

281 omains, from perception to language and from empathy to problem solving, that were once considered ou

282 various aspects of social behaviors such as empathy, trust, in-group preference, and memory of socia

283 ion study to investigate the neural basis of empathy using correlational analytic methods.

284 ted a genome-wide meta-analysis of cognitive empathy using the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' Test (E

285 ffects the psychophysiological correlates of empathy vs. personal distress.

286 an's photograph; however, this newly created empathy waned rather quickly.

287 Cognitive empathy was associated with higher levels of motivation

288 Acute impairment of affective empathy was associated with infarcts in the hypothesized

289 In contrast, affective empathy was associated with lower levels of behavioural

290 In this study, the neuroanatomic basis of empathy was investigated in 123 patients with FTLD, Alzh

291 grity of the insular cortex, while affective empathy was predicted by a marker of iron content in sec

292 All patients with impaired affective empathy were also impaired in comprehension of affective

293 increased burnout in all domains and reduced empathy were associated with increased odds of self-perc

294 ticular, individual differences in cognitive empathy were associated with markers of myeloarchitectur

295 characterized by fun, whereas people high in empathy were central to networks characterized by trust.

296 Patients with impaired affective empathy were older, but showed no difference in performa

297 tal junction, would cause impaired affective empathy (whereas bilateral damage to temporoparietal jun

298 prefrontal cortex is implicated in emotional empathy, whereas dorsal medial prefrontal cortex is impl

299 lights how mechanisms such as expectancy and empathy, which are seen as inducing musical emotions, ar

300 theoretical and empirical evidence regarding empathy, which raises questions about the ordering and m