ライフサイエンスコーパス: event-related potential

1 potential), and (3) top-down attention (P3b event-related potential).

2 ance advantage was reflected in a smaller P3 event related potential.

3 teral delay activity (tCDA component) of the event-related potential.

4 broadband field potentials, and less so with event related potentials.

5 in full-term and preterm human infants using event-related potentials.

6 eplicated a prior neuroimaging version using event-related potentials.

7 investigated acoustic reflex thresholds and event-related potentials.

8 A parallel study involved the measurement of event-related potentials.

9 d dishabituation, imitation-based tasks, and event-related potentials.

10 ory responses, with no evidence of cognitive event-related potentials.

11 sting semantic associations, as evidenced by event-related potentials [4-7].

12 To assess the clinical relevance of event-related potentials, a correlation analysis between

13 visually presented backward-words, and that event-related potentials above the frontal lobe are affe

14 d behavior better than stimulus phase or the event-related potential after the gap.

15 istics parametrically modulated single-trial event-related potential amplitudes during an early, tran

16 These modulations are tracked using classic event-related potential analyses complemented by Lempel-

17 at ceiling (94.8% accuracy), and traditional event-related potential analyses revealed only modest mo

18 We conducted time-frequency and event-related potential analyses to examine the time cou

19 In contrast, event-related potential analysis revealed that the contr

20 iness perception by employing scalp recorded event related potentials and evaluating effects on compo

21 for identifying generators of scalp-recorded event related potentials and for examining the physiolog

22 ffective patients, n = 13 healthy controls), event-related potential and event-related time-frequency

23 Our work demonstrates that there exist event-related potential and oscillatory correlates of vi

24 hibitory currents, as well as alterations in event-related potentials and brain oscillatory activity.

25 llable and chirp identification tasks, while event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonan

26 local contextual processing using a combined event-related potentials and lesion approach.

27 gic interneurons led to deficits in auditory event-related potentials and seizure manifestation, wher

28 Event-related potentials and source analysis were used t

29 Here, we combined event-related potentials and structural MRI to reveal th

30 ratings, skin conductance responses and EEG event-related potentials) and tonic arousal [indexed by

31 nses, (2) bottom-up attention orienting (P3a event-related potential), and (3) top-down attention (P3

32 in general neurocognitive functioning using event-related potentials, and found that greater liberal

33 Event-related potentials are synchronized to the onset o

34 This behavioral dichotomy is explained by event-related potentials around the parietal regions: lo

35 We recorded event-related potentials as participants performed a pro

36 P20, N40, and P80 components of the auditory event-related potential, as well as baseline and auditor

37 Following the event-related potential assessment, Hurricane Sandy, the

38 g bias was reflected in an asymmetry of late event-related potentials associated with motion evaluati

39 ces is further supported by a negative-going event-related potential at approximately 400 ms (N400),

40 Here we used dynamic causal modeling of event-related potentials, combined with group source rec

41 Another emotion-relevant event-related potential component (the early posterior n

42 while the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential component that reflects sustaine

43 ontrast, the feedback-related negativity, an event-related potential component thought to reflect neu

44 logical marker of visual selection (the N2pc event-related potential component) evoked by an array of

45 manifested as neuronal attenuation on the N1 event-related potential component.

46 ch has established the existence of numerous event-related potential components measuring different c

47 Candidate measures include event-related potential components with established sens

48 Results of three event-related potential components, including the P2, th

49 with schizophrenia was found for each of the event-related potential components.

50 data (reaction time and accuracy) and in two event-related potential components: N2 and SP (a slow po

51 Event-related potential correlates of explicit face reco

52 High-density 129-channel event-related potential data were recorded from 26 parti

53 explanation, especially in the light of ERP (event-related potentials) data showing large evoked resp

54 al-to-trial variability in reaction time and event-related potential deficits during attention tasks.

55 Event-related potentials demonstrated early sensitivity

56 Somatosensory attention-orienting event-related potentials differentiated patients who cou

57 asure suppression of the N1 component of the event-related potential during active generation and pas

58 We analyzed event-related potentials during encoding and showed that

59 (n = 15) participants with their lateralized event-related potentials during the performance of a vis

60 Event-related potentials during the talk/listen task wer

61 contralateral-delay activity (CDA) of human event-related potentials during visual search tasks in w

62 Using high-density electroencephalogram/event-related potential (EEG/ERP) recordings and source-

63 e mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related potential elicited automatically by audito

64 The reward positivity, an event-related potential elicited by feedback indicating

65 wo separate studies, the N1 component of the event-related potential elicited by speech sounds during

66 During study, event-related potentials elicited by voices subsequently

67 We measured event-related potentials elicited from unique hues and t

68 this article is to review major findings in event related potential (ERP) research in schizophrenia

69 The investigators compared event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes and event-relat

70 In the present study, event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral measures we

71 The present event-related potential (ERP) and functional magnetic re

72 Responses were analyzed using both event-related potential (ERP) and neuro-oscillatory (evo

73 h negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) and tested native and non-

74 tional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and event-related potential (ERP) approach to examine the ne

75 An event-related potential (ERP) component reliably associa

76 The N400 is an event-related potential (ERP) component that is elicited

77 neurodevelopment of ISL, we investigated the event-related potential (ERP) correlates of learning in

78 Moreover, the event-related potential (ERP) data obtained from Experim

79 udy tested emotional speech processing in an event-related potential (ERP) experiment using an implic

80 ry functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potential (ERP) experiments using a novel

81 ons of the feedback-related negativity (FRN) event-related potential (ERP) have been suggested as a p

82 positive potential (LPP) is a commonly used event-related potential (ERP) in the study of emotion an

83 ormation in visuospatial working memory, the event-related potential (ERP) index of maintenance is fo

84 Event-related potential (ERP) investigations have led to

85 gativity (MMN) and visual P1 are established event-related potential (ERP) markers of impaired audito

86 rent experiments capitalized on hypothesized event-related potential (ERP) measures of familiarity an

87 that the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential (ERP) originating in the medial

88 y and lateralized scalp distributions of the event-related potential (ERP) P3 amplitude.

89 ts in these perceptual tasks, as assessed by event-related potential (ERP) recordings.

90 Event-related potential (ERP) studies in young adults ha

91 Thus far the vast majority of event-related potential (ERP) studies investigating the

92 Event-related potential (ERP) studies of recognition mem

93 Event-related potential (ERP) studies of semantic proces

94 ns of these findings appear to conflict with event-related potential (ERP) studies showing no evidenc

95 This stands in sharp contrast to event-related potential (ERP) studies, as ERPs have been

96 We describe an event-related potential (ERP) study (Experiment 1) and a

97 This Event-Related Potential (ERP) study investigated whether

98 between these possibilities, we conducted an event-related potential (ERP) study testing the hypothes

99 investigated this hypothesis in the present event-related potential (ERP) study.

100 eval as assessed by repetition priming in an event-related potential (ERP) study.

101 administration while subjects engaged in an event-related potential (ERP) task known to be a valid i

102 To achieve this, we extended the classic Event-Related Potential (ERP) techniques (such as peak-t

103 We examined the N400 event-related potential (ERP) to explore interactions be

104 eeler task was used to determine when in the event-related potential (ERP) waveform indices of word a

105 (ERN) and positivity (Pe) are components of event-related potential (ERP) waveforms recorded from hu

106 Pop-out target detection generated a P300 event-related potential (ERP) with a peak amplitude over

107 tood semantically sensitive component of the event-related potential (ERP), others have been observed

108 transient, spatially selective signal in the event-related potential (ERP), which scaled with relativ

109 wn marker of early face processing, the N170 event-related potential (ERP).

110 Event-related potentials (ERP) provide an objective inde

111 Here we report a study that used event-related potentials (ERP) to examine the neural and

112 We used event-related potentials (ERP) to test the hypothesis th

113 This event-related potentials (ERP) waveform, known as contra

114 Sixty-four-channel event-related potentials (ERP) were acquired during a vi

115 Event-related potentials (ERP) were measured when pleasa

116 To address this question we recorded event-related potentials (ERP) while subjects performed

117 In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERP) with a balloon analogue r

118 and deflections in the raw potential trace (event-related potential; ERP).

119 In the second experiment, we also measured Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and observed robust elec

120 on paradigm that by simultaneously recording event-related potentials (ERPs) allowed for accessing th

121 Combining event-related potentials (ERPs) and a defensive context

122 up of patients using electroencephalographic event-related potentials (ERPs) and determined their lon

123 In experiments using event-related potentials (ERPs) and functional magnetic

124 ddress this issue by combining evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs) and functional magnetic

125 in networks supporting these processes using event-related potentials (ERPs) and functional magnetic

126 Continuous EEG and time-locked event-related potentials (ERPs) and gaze fixation were r

127 Here we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) and magnetic fields (ERM

128 o pictures of objects rotated in depth using event-related potentials (ERPs) and masked repetition pr

129 The current study used event-related potentials (ERPs) and masked repetition pr

130 by combining the high temporal resolution of event-related potentials (ERPs) and the high spatial res

131 Distinctive features in sensory event-related potentials (ERPs) are endophenotypic bioma

132 Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 event-related potentials (ERPs) are reduced in schizophr

133 Event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used in both

134 Although event-related potentials (ERPs) are widely used to study

135 We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) as human participants co

136 Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) as well as accuracy and

137 temporal-cortical sources revealed enhanced event-related potentials (ERPs) as well as decreased alp

138 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) combined with behavioral

139 In a previous study we used recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs) during a paradigm modele

140 Event-related potentials (ERPs) during Think and No-Thin

141 Using event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by unattended s

142 We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked in response to au

143 olating the multisensory components of AV-VA event-related potentials (ERPs) from the sum of their un

144 In this regard, event-related potentials (ERPs) have been identified as

145 neural correlates of action monitoring with event-related potentials (ERPs) have focused on the erro

146 e we characterized neuronal oscillations and event-related potentials (ERPs) in Cynomolgus macaques f

147 Behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to the targe

148 At 6-10 months, we recorded infants' event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to viewing f

149 address this knowledge gap, we measured EEG event-related potentials (ERPs) in two macaque monkeys u

150 ain-computer interface (BCI) based on visual event-related potentials (ERPs) is of limited applicatio

151 e pathogenesis of RTT and that assessment of event-related potentials (ERPs) may serve as a biomarker

152 Previous reports consistently showed that event-related potentials (ERPs) measured over early soma

153 (ADHD) have reliably found reduced amplitude event-related potentials (ERPs) measuring attention-rela

154 ecision accuracy was not predicted by either event-related potentials (ERPs) or oscillatory power mea

155 Here, by analyzing event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded in humans durin

156 The event-related potentials (ERPs) results showed atypical

157 In the last two conditions, the auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a prominent neg

158 ysiological recordings reveal alterations in event-related potentials (ERPs) similar to those observe

159 dgments of learning (JOLs) are made, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to compare neural correl

160 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to demonstrate that tact

161 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the cortical

162 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the extent to

163 We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the timin

164 Here, we investigated these issues by using event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure the effects o

165 Transient event-related potentials (ERPs) to stimulus onset (visua

166 poral resolution and whole-brain coverage of event-related potentials (ERPs) to test the hypothesis t

167 is provided by spatial attention effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) under conditions of rapi

168 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were additionally measur

169 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in a memo

170 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investi

171 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to assess

172 In groups of 7-year-olds and 11-year-olds, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to briefly

173 In the current study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while Cauc

174 Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while list

175 use treatment performed a Go/NoGo task while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

176 sual and auditory working memory tasks while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded.

177 Herein, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate

178 or pain were collected using self-report and event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants under

179 Here, we recorded high-density scalp event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants were

180 registered using the N400 component of human event-related potentials (ERPs), a highly sensitive inde

181 ere, we used a combination of psychophysics, event-related potentials (ERPs), and quantitative modeli

182 heric transfer time (IHTT) as measured using event-related potentials (ERPs), and related this to DWI

183 ention Network Test), electroencephalography/event-related potentials (ERPs), and standardized low-re

184 and lateralization of this activation using event-related potentials (ERPs), in particular, occipito

185 ample, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a event-related potentials (ERPs), neurophysiological indi

186 We find that feedback-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically those clas

187 In the analysis of stimulation-induced event-related potentials (ERPs), we focused on model-bas

188 Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we show that active exp

189 ence of the pictures: the P300 and slow wave event-related potentials (ERPs).

190 as a prominent marker of Stroop conflict in event-related potentials (ERPs).

191 ng a picture-word interference paradigm with event-related potentials (ERPs).

192 asked priming paradigm with the recording of event-related potentials (ERPs).

193 n with sensory over-responsivity (SOR) using event-related potentials (ERPs).

194 al metaphorical sentences were examined with event-related potentials (ERPs).

195 ted during such cuing paradigms by recording event-related potentials (ERPs).

196 al performance and the magnitude of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs).

197 ion-priming paradigm with the measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs).

198 ing in infants with West syndrome (WS) using event-related potentials (ERPs).

199 phenotypes such as subcomponents of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs).

200 We show that a brain measure (event-related potentials, ERPs) of word processing in ch

201 lying MMN impairments in schizophrenia using event-related potential, event-related spectral decompos

202 h functional neuroimaging, also demonstrated event-related potential evidence of attentional orientin

203 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event related potential evoked by violations of regulari

204 Analysis of the event-related potentials evoked by the subsequent target

205 In the event-related potential experiment, subjects performed a

206 electrodes have demonstrated a face-specific event-related potential (face-N200) recorded from human

207 analogous to procedures for recording scalp event-related potentials from humans and found that monk

208 density electroencephalogram, and sources of event-related potential generators identified at right a

209 Studies of event-related potentials have consistently shown that sc

210 Event-related potentials have provided evidence for this

211 Reduced amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may ch

212 similar to an "attentional habit." Recording event-related potentials in humans during a reinforcemen

213 Studies of event-related potentials in humans have established larg

214 e present study investigated this issue with event-related potentials in humans, focusing on the N2pc

215 time course of effort cost integration using event-related potentials in hungry human subjects while

216 and healthy control individuals by analyzing event-related potentials in the electroencephalogram dur

217 We review the literature on event-related potentials, including our own data set, to

218 ermine whether mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential index of auditory sensory discri

219 /beta oscillations and frontal and posterior event-related potentials indexed feature-general top-dow

220 All four event-related potential indices are potentially valid en

221 riance between schizophrenia and each of the event-related potential indices.

222 by the error-related negativity (ERN) in the event-related potential, is a reliable finding in obsess

223 macological features with the deviant-evoked event-related potential known as mismatch negativity (MM

224 n audition have capitalized on low-frequency event-related potentials (LF-ERPs), such as the mismatch

225 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a brain event-related potential marker of change detection thoug

226 d negativity is a negative deflection in the event-related potential maximal approximately 50 msec af

227 The selection negativity, an event-related potential measure of sensory amplification

228 ficance of the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential measured in humans which indexes

229 d by self-report ratings, and behavioral and event-related potential measurements were used to quanti

230 th controls on all cognitive-performance and event-related potential measures (all p < .05).

231 Performance and event-related potential measures (inter alia Cue-P3 and

232 al and local context in both behavioural and event-related potential measures was found, with partici

233 (sympathetic adrenal medullary system), EEG event-related potentials (nociceptive cortical activity)

234 ctioning may be investigated using olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs).

235 mpared on cognitive-performance measures and event-related potentials of conflict monitoring (N2) and

236 n voices correctly classified as "new." This event-related potential OLD/NEW effect was limited to th

237 sm and conflict-related activity measured by event-related potentials originating in the anterior cin

238 Event-related potentials over lateral prefrontal cortex,

239 The event-related potential P2 amplitude elicited by non-tar

240 Several components of event-related potentials--P50 suppression, P300 amplitud

241 Using a similar auditory event-related potential paradigm in both rats and humans

242 atch negativity (MMN) component of the human event-related potential provides a sensitive metric of d

243 of distractor expectancy were assessed using event-related potentials recorded during the cue-to-targ

244 ixed-sequence (to establish prediction): (i) event-related potential recordings while passively viewi

245 gativity and P300 components of the auditory event-related potential, reflecting two steps of auditor

246 medial-frontal cortex, we could enhance the event-related potential related to learning from mistake

247 he latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on probabilities of soun

248 paired AER in schizophrenia using a combined event-related potential/resting-state fMRI approach.

249 sms underlying impaired AER using a combined event-related potential/resting-state functional connect

250 Overall, these event-related potential results provide the first neurop

251 Event-related potentials revealed a posterior P2 compone

252 g and behavioral probes: psychophysiological event-related potentials, self-report, simulated cocaine

253 This research tested (i) whether event-related potentials, specifically the late positive

254 uch a differential response is manifested in event-related potential studies as the mismatch negativi

255 This has been observed in neuroimaging and event-related potential studies centered in particular o

256 been shown repeatedly with neuroimaging and event-related potential studies for the last several dec

257 This event-related potential study tested whether hyperarticu

258 In the present event-related potential study, we tested whether and how

259 Here, we report an event-related potentials study of the time course of one

260 is a preattentive component of the auditory event-related potential that is elicited by a change in

261 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an auditory event-related potential that reflects an attentional tri

262 N170 and N250 are two event-related potentials that have been studied in relat

263 havioral adaptation, partly because a robust event-related potential, the feedback-related negativity

264 In event-related potential/time-frequency analyses, patient

265 nt of the N170 (negative peak around 170 ms) event-related potential to faces emerged, but a face-sen

266 presentation and the contralateral P1 visual event-related potential to investigate how aversive olfa

267 xploited the temporal resolution afforded by event-related potentials to disentangle the impact of st

268 Next, we use event-related potentials to show that orientation deviat

269 surrogate model of impulsivity, we utilized event-related potentials to study the neural mechanisms

270 Group differences were also observed in the event-related potentials to targets in the alphanumeric

271 Here we exploited the sensitivity of event-related potentials to test the hypothesis that ele

272 We analysed auditory event-related potentials to tones and syllables from 16

273 ate stages of visual processing, we measured event-related potentials to various categories of visual

274 Combining visual event-related potential (VERP) indices (P1 and P250/s) w

275 bal form and motion with high-density visual event-related potentials (VERPs) in 4- to 5-month-old in

276 sure of suppression--the PD component of the event-related potential--was associated with variations

277 ts of contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential waveform that tracks the number

278 Event-related potentials were acquired, while subjects r

279 erformed a masked Go/No-Go task during which event-related potentials were measured.

280 Intervention Event-related potentials were obtained from 24 patients

281 Event-related potentials were recorded as participants d

282 Event-related potentials were recorded from 32 scalp ele

283 Intracranial somatosensory event-related potentials were recorded from temporal, pa

284 Event-related potentials were recorded in 16 schizophren

285 Participants' brain event-related potentials were recorded in response to id

286 In the current study, event-related potentials were recorded while participant

287 pictures of butterflies were presented while event-related potentials were recorded.

288 ilistic reinforcement task while 128-channel event-related potentials were recorded.

289 s and no-stress conditions while 128-channel event-related potentials were recorded.

290 ed at central and peripheral locations while event-related potentials were recorded.

291 The effects of training on event-related potentials were restricted to the distract

292 At entry to the study (mean age, 22 months), event-related potentials were used to measure neural pro

293 ophysiological responses (the N400 effect of event-related potentials) were compared during the proce

294 tion time and accuracy), and brain activity (event-related potentials) were measured.

295 The feedback-related negativity of the event-related potential, which is commonly assumed to be

296 neuronal substrate of a known deviant-evoked event-related potential, which is of fundamental signifi

297 By measuring event-related potentials while human observers performed

298 Here, we used event-related potentials whilst dyslexic and control adu

299 In conclusion, event-related potential word repetition effects appear s

300 -associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, using an event-related potential word repetition paradigm with de