ライフサイエンスコーパス: fare

1 is usually considered as standard great ape fare.

2 receptor alpha (PPARalpha) demonstrated that FARE-1 is a PPARalpha response element capable of confer

3 ift assays demonstrated that PPARalpha bound FARE-1 with the retinoid X receptor alpha.

4 I gene promoter fatty acid response element (FARE-1) was localized to a hexameric repeat sequence loc

5 nscription factor competitively binds at the FARE and modulates fatty acid induction of the promoters

6 mplexes with oligonucleotides containing the FARE, and anti-PPARalpha antibody shifted nuclear protei

7 with CRVO (CFT >250 mum at month 3) did not fare as well as early responders if they were treated wi

8 that elderly recipients of liver allografts fare as well as their younger counterparts, but our resu

9 f life and distress, patients who choose CPM fare as well as those who do not in the first year after

10 Low-risk elderly patients fare as well as younger patients after liver transplanta

11 Cognitive behavior therapy has fared as well as antidepressant medication with severely

12 T-ALL patients fared as well as B-progenitor patients on DFCI ALL Conso

13 the past decade, but black children have not fared as well as white children in large national trials

14 h lower pretransplant serum bilirubin levels fared as well as younger patients.

15 ts reported as having no acute rejection and fare at least as poorly as those with reported kidney gr

16 nd 12 months identified patients destined to fare badly, although criteria at 18 months were less use

17 However, patients with metastases still fare badly, and the therapy carries short-term and long-

18 th neuroblastomas having N-myc amplification fare badly.

19 dence-based medicine, carotid endarterectomy fares badly, with only the indications for the surgery h

20 /etoposide and ifosfamide/doxorubicin trials fared best.

21 er patients with acute myocardial infarction fare better at centers where more patients undergo prima

22 In fact, these women actually fare better on measures of psychologic function than do

23 Children with infected joints generally fare better than adults despite having proportionately m

24 m -100% if all patients in the control group fare better than all patients in the treatment group up

25 we find that purely evolutionary techniques fare better than do model-based approaches across all bu

26 ht into the question of why some individuals fare better than others do when encountering stress in t

27 1999, nonmetropolitan practices appeared to fare better than others.

28 parently alive, as judged by intact DNA, and fare better than spores.

29 ictions provided robust results, but did not fare better than the three best algorithms.

30 Such libraries are predicted to fare better than traditional compound collections in phe

31 nmental as well as genetic data, will likely fare better than traditional linkage analysis in disenta

32 resilient to low-yield agriculture and thus fare better under land sharing.

33 patients with comorbid major depression may fare better with IPT than with prolonged exposure.

34 tion in time to SPMS and that those who quit fare better.

35 grafts that received Custom-I solutions also fared better (0.75, P < 0.05) than the 21.4% that had Cu

36 d in specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions fared better against I/R-induced injury than SPF Nod2(-/

37 eir high failure rate, other cellular assays fared better and although they have not entered widespre

38 and those without graft-versus-host disease fared better as compared with their allogeneic and graft

39 e who demonstrated this immunologic response fared better clinically: 59% and 88% attained complete o

40 decisions, even if more than they hoped for, fared better on all decision-related outcomes.

41 cal management with naltrexone, CBI, or both fared better on drinking outcomes, whereas acamprosate s

42 h tumors harboring EGFR activating mutations fared better on erlotinib alone (median PFS, 18.2 months

43 They also fared better on most secondary outcomes, including recov

44 CAP participants also fared better on secondary outcomes including recovery (A

45 Australia's marine mammals have fared better overall, but status assessment for them is

46 val rates than males (P = .005) and children fared better than adolescents and adults (P = .002).

47 e last century, but children under five have fared better than adult males.

48 Girls clearly fared better than boys (P < .001) on protocols used duri

49 tics as a simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) fared better than diabetics receiving a kidney alone (9.

50 phageal reconstruction, patients in group II fared better than patients in group I in terms of surviv

51 Both SCIT groups fared better than pharmacotherapy alone at the end of 1

52 se, 12 of whom with baseline low-risk status fared better than the remainder (P = .08).

53 e bleeding, but patients receiving abciximab fared better than those receiving placebo.

54 Patients with germinoma fared better than those with NGGCTs (P =.016 and.014 for

55 where adults between the ages of 30-60 years fared better than younger adults aged 18-30 years.

56 rioritising immunity while older individuals fared better when maintaining high-protein nutritional p

57 Fusarium cases fared better with natamycin than with voriconazole (regr

58 , whereas patients with the lowest quartiles fared better with protocol-based care (odds ratios, 0.32

59 > or =298 g (those in the group with EF >35% fared better) but not in the group with LV mass <298 g.

60 the alternative of top-down regulation have fared better.

61 while those exposed to injury plus treatment fared better.

62 ated datasets, the Bayesian method generally fares better than the ML approach in accuracy and covera

63 er the last decade with pediatric recipients faring better than adults.

64 ncy in neuroprotection, with forced exercise faring better than voluntary exercise through increased

65 widespread use of smart cards for automated fare collection in these systems offers a unique opportu

66 s, it would be interesting to learn how they fare compared to living donor kidneys long term.

67 re), 4) criterion validity (how new criteria fare compared to standards), 5) measurement burden (cost

68 Mice exposed to cold fare considerably better at 05:00 (Zeitgeber time 22) wh

69 Since 1975, surgeons have fared disproportionately worse than researchers in other

70 Here, we show that offspring fare equally well regardless of the sex or number of par

71 ons, the EGS patients who were managed early fared equally well, if not better, than the EGS patients

72 ons that primarily reviewed POR applications fared equivalently to LOR applications; in contrast, POR

73 with detectable MRD at end of consolidation fared especially poorly, with only a 43% plus or minus 7

74 embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on IRS-IV fared especially well (5-year FFSR, 93%; n = 90).

75 tant in their antral colonization defect and fared even worse than the Che(-) mutant in the corpus.

76 Younger patients in particular fared extremely well with this treatment regimen.

77 istinguishing men who are a priori likely to fare favourably with ADT from those who harbour disease

78 s in service cost, emissions, and with split fares, hinting toward a wide passenger acceptance of suc

79 worse survival, but it is not known how they fare in adjuvant studies.

80 How these hospitals fare in other domains, such as patient satisfaction, rem

81 so complicate predictions of how belugas may fare in the future.

82 sts how the efficacy findings of T2 research fare in the real world, diverse populations, and varied

83 e Institute of Medicine priority topics have fared in the agencies' funding programs, and the develop

84 and ask how the centrality of gene trees has fared in the next-generation era.

85 years, to see how medical aid projects were faring in particular, and to assess whether the past dec

86 e Abl inhibitors dasatinib and nilotinib are faring in the treatment of imatinib-resistant CML, espec

87 ) older adults living in low-education areas fare less well cognitively than those living in high-edu

88 f the following 3 criteria, POR applications fare less well than LOR applications: (1) POR status and

89 have diploid or unfavorable histology tumors fare less well.

90 Patients with refractory SAA fared less well after high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy

91 Patients with poorly differentiated cancers fared less well than those with better differentiated le

92 modeling of other human cancer types, it has fared less well with respect to prostate cancer.

93 s urinary incontinence by urodynamic testing fare more poorly after the most commonly offered surgica

94 mals nearly doubles, with pcm-1 larvae again faring more poorly than N2 larvae.

95 nucleotide assembly-based strategy does not fare much better, as metagenomic assemblies are typicall

96 , the methods without using sequence profile fare much worse than using sequence profile.

97 Candidates with exceptions fared much better on the waiting list compared to those

98 All animals receiving STI fared much better than 22 untreated SIVmac251-infected i

99 viduals selected for KT; however, a minority fares much worse.

100 saster and the impact of social norms; women fare no better when they constitute a small share of the

101 the professionally administered intervention fared no better in terms of quality of life than patient

102 receive antibiotics for neutrocytic ascites fared no worse than patients who did receive antibiotics

103 empirical evidence about how elderly people fare on dialysis.

104 How they have fared on patient outcomes during the past decade is unkn

105 how children with ischaemic perinatal stroke fare over time is particularly important, as there has b

106 These patients often fare poorly after treatment with conventional chemothera

107 status, and/or bone or visceral involvement fare poorly and are unlikely to benefit significantly fr

108 Patients destined to fare poorly can be identified early during therapy.

109 ant rates of mortality and morbidity and may fare poorly compared with less-invasive procedures.

110 ket (Austin, Texas) found that periodontists fare poorly on the Yelp website for nearly all measured

111 materials with excellent in-plane properties fare poorly when out-of-plane through-thickness properti

112 he best way to identify patients destined to fare poorly, thereby allowing early clinical interventio

113 erally favorable, but a minority of patients fare poorly.

114 to identify patients who are more likely to fare poorly.

115 The 15 patients treated for PD fared poorly, although two had scintigraphic findings su

116 who could not complete the completion repair fared poorly.

117 arly those with a SER, who have historically fared poorly.

118 ry in Afghanistan who returned to duty still fared quite poorly on many clinical outcome measures 6-1

119 ited Kingdom suggests that cancer drugs have fared quite well, with most recommendations being positi

120 d cognitive processes, emotional functioning fares relatively well.

121 concern because patients discharged at night fare significantly worse than those discharged during th

122 ion demonstrated that grafts of older donors fared significantly better in older recipients.

123 in Level 2, patients with anxious depression fared significantly worse in both the switching and augm

124 3 abnormalities, infants younger than 1 year fared significantly worse than patients 1 year of age or

125 patients who received whole-pelvis treatment fared significantly worse than those in the other two gr

126 t 8% of the intensity of normal lymphocytes) fared significantly worse than those with lower-density

127 1 to 0.28; P<.001), while non-Fusarium cases fared similarly (regression coefficient=0.02 logMAR; 95%

128 e tissue complications of aging and diabetes fared since the identification of the link between these

129 H1 and FBXW7 mutant-positive patients do not fare sufficiently well to warrant an individualized trea

130 ot take a village to raise a child; children fared the same in nuclear as in extended families.

131 s analysis shows that African American males fared the worst, with lives characterized by incarcerati

132 rent prices for similar services (e.g., full-fare vs. advanced-purchase plane tickets, full tuition v

133 A promoter fatty acid response element (FARE) was mapped, mutation of which ablated fatty acid-m

134 ancer patients with venous thrombosis do not fare well and have an increased mortality compared with

135 neration of Aurora kinase inhibitors did not fare well in clinical trials, owing to poor efficacy and

136 Integral membrane proteins do not fare well when extracted from biological membranes and a

137 However, HHpred does not fare well when proteins under consideration are low-homo

138 Patients with PDACs with this profile fared well after surgery.

139 Our method fared well compared to an existing motif finding method

140 Regrettably, neither of the 2 approaches has fared well in animal experiments, and the only clinical

141 he LTCC tiles, and their overall performance fared well.

142 persistently elevated in those patients who fared well.

143 Here, I discuss how behavioral work fares with this new model and how visual detection is in

144 o high levels of posttraining fear tended to fare worse at the follow-up if they received methylene b

145 Children receiving XRT fare worse overall; chemotherapy added to XRT does not s

146 uggest that DCD livers on HCV disease do not fare worse than DCD livers on non-HCV disease.

147 Young women may fare worse than middle-aged or elderly women in both phy

148 In general, patients with carcinosarcomas fare worse than patients with carcinomas of the same ana

149 ile receiving medication, children with ADHD fare worse than their peers across a wide range of outco

150 er septic conditions, PAD4(-/-) mice did not fare worse than wild-type mice and had comparable surviv

151 vation and, in contrast to other xenografts, fare worse when the complement of the graft recipient is

152 )-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) fare worse, presumably because of temozolomide resistanc

153 ith alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma fare worse; however, FFS and overall survival are substa

154 The non-ambulant group also fared worse in terms of postoperative complication rate,

155 Standard care participants fared worse on the PAS-ADD comorbid organic disorder sub

156 for functional capacity, in which etanercept fared worse than the other treatments: steroids vs. etan

157 during the first 6 months (5 early, 6 late) fared worse than those with lower p24 levels.

158 and systemic disease, with 67%-83% fatality, faring worse than placebo-treated control animals.

159 n the presence of complications, with cATBAD faring worse.