ライフサイエンスコーパス: fluorescence-activated cell sorting

1 pression were measured using flow cytometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorting).

2 mphoid organs and purified by multiparameter fluorescence activated cell sorting.

3 ression of injected cells after isolation by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

4 ated from the hearts of PG(WT) and PG(TR) by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

5 macrophages by using confocal microscopy and fluorescence activated cell sorting.

6 iciently labeled LAP clones were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

7 rin-exacerbated respiratory disease by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

8 cell injury models using both histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

9 i-67, and cleaved caspase 3 were measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

10 site for genomic editing, can be isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

11 gammadeltaT cells were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

12 HSC and CD133 MP levels were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

13 imitations of traditional flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

14 in calcified arteries by immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

15 ed in the Adult Clinical Trials Group 384 by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

16 a CD133 and CD39 MP subsets were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

17 ha2 protein expression was measured by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

18 OPCs, which could be further purified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

19 levels were examined by quantitative PCR in fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

20 d), and B cells (BC4d) were determined using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

21 ty, allowing the isolation of these cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

22 Transduced cells underwent fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

23 xpression was determined by high-dimensional fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

24 expression of MHC class II/CD80 measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

25 ry molecules (CD80 and CD86) was measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

26 th factor receptor (p75) in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

27 otent cells and committed neural cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

28 ry clones are selected by multiple rounds of fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

29 isolation of the associated subpopulation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

30 to the mean fluorescence of GFP measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

31 k of DNA replication, and G2 arrest by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

32 D4, Gr1, and Mac1 antibodies and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

33 y directed evolution using yeast display and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

34 sing combinations of chemokine receptors and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

35 were labeled with fluorescent antibodies for fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

36 rifying undifferentiated spermatogonia using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

37 matured by sequential random mutagenesis and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

38 ic procedure over a period of 16 weeks using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

39 inergic neurons followed by enrichment using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

40 nd electron microscopy, lineage tracing, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

41 e generated from asynchronous cultures using fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

42 rase chain reaction; 2) Western blotting; 3) fluorescence-activated cell sorting; 4) immunohistochemi

43 ropositive cases were tested additionally by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, a live transfected

44 ns based on cell growth/survival, as well as fluorescence-activated cell sorting according to fluores

45 s with CVID homogenously grouped by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting allowed additional s

46 e or intracellular staining and multi-colour fluorescence activated cell sorting alone or in combinat

47 Confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses showed tran

48 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses were perfor

49 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses with anti-p

50 We used immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses with in viv

51 g results were corroborated by histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses.

52 Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis was used to

53 ro specific binding of ligands was tested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and by radi

54 nt interleukin-17 (IL-17) were quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and enzyme-

55 plant or OVA-B16F10 tumor could be traced by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis as effector

56 Finally, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis demonstrate

57 ding was assessed by cell binding assays and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis in a variet

58 fluorescence protein signal was detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis in the CD90

59 Immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis indicate th

60 [3H]Thymidine labeling and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis indicated t

61 We used a multiparameter approach, including fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of cell-sur

62 Finally, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of liver CD

63 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of monolaye

64 der protein led to apoptosis, as assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of propidiu

65 Histology and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of the bone

66 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed el

67 In the early posttransplant phase, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed pr

68 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed re

69 CSCs can be isolated from L2G85 mice, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed expr

70 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed only

71 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis suggested t

72 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was perform

73 l viability as a marker of proliferation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was used to

74 assay) and improved gemcitabine sensitivity (fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis).

75 Mass spectrometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and functi

76 gammaH2A.X assay, cell cycle progression by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and PARP-1

77 assays, a nuclear fragmentation assay, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and time-l

78 By using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, fibrocytes

79 Using multi-parameter fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, we quantif

80 ed in gastric tissue and peripheral blood by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

81 xpression of CD86 and CD80 was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

82 red by using either time-lapse microscopy or fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

83 Immune cells were characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

84 wed by biodistribution, autoradiography, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis.

85 Fluorescence activated cell sorting and immunofluorescen

86 In this paper, we use fluorescence activated cell sorting and RNA-seq to deter

87 Bone marrow-derived HSCs were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and administered aft

88 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and biochemical anal

89 of microparticles by CACs was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and by fluorescence

90 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cDNA-microarray

91 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and cell binding ass

92 m differentiated cultures were purified with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and characterized.

93 nd healthy control subjects were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and compared for the

94 t day 21, we harvested blood and spleens for fluorescence-activated cell sorting and hearts for 2,3,5

95 wing acute drug exposure using intracellular fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunoblot analy

96 ubset of primary HSCs was demonstrated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunofluorescen

97 h and without asthma was examined by RT-PCR, fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunohistochemi

98 l model for beta2AR expression, we performed fluorescence-activated cell sorting and isolated cells t

99 uorescently mark the ZPA or AER, followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and low-cell H3K27ac

100 LC2s and TH2 cells were isolated by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting and magnetic cell so

101 Direct comparisons with cell isolation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and magnetic-bead-ba

102 , single MEP cells were analyzed using index fluorescence-activated cell sorting and parallel targete

103 High-viability cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and re-suspended in

104 vestigated at the protein and gene levels by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and real-time revers

105 Phenotype analysis was performed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and real-time revers

106 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and single-cell reve

107 ILC2s were isolated by means of fluorescence-activated cell sorting and studied for Il5

108 ined from healthy control subjects underwent fluorescence-activated cell sorting and then were cocult

109 xp3GFP+ CBir1-Tg Treg cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and transferred into

110 ell type-specific functions were assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and viral-mediated o

111 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting and Western blotting

112 Numerous clones were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and affinity matura

113 followed by mass spectrometry, phospho-flow fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and antibody arrays

114 by means of RT-PCR, Western immunoblotting, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and double-immunofl

115 try, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and electrophysiolo

116 tterns were examined by immunocytochemistry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and enzyme-linked i

117 fluorescent labeling, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and quantitative PC

118 ions, isolated these subpopulations by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and subjected them

119 lls from mouse intestine were isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and transcriptional

120 In IAS cells isolated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, Ano1 expression was

121 ersister-FACSeq, which is a method that uses fluorescence-activated cell sorting, antibiotic toleranc

122 nd to be negative, should be retested with a fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay when available

123 l antimicrobial activity was assessed with a fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay.

124 ing quantitative fluorescence analysis using fluorescence-activated cell sorting assay.

125 These 2 patients alone tested positive by a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assay.

126 d immunosorbent, transfected cell-based, and fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assays.

127 loride staining determined infarct size, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting assessed cell compos

128 were isolated by enzymatic dissociation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting at day 3 following s

129 Cholinergic neurons were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting based on either tran

130 gion of late embryonic mice were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting based on their expre

131 s from normal, RD and HGPS individuals using fluorescence activated cell sorting-based assays.

132 We exploited a high-throughput, fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based green fluoresc

133 Here we describe and validate a fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based protocol that

134 Our two-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based screen provide

135 , high-throughput and quantitative two-color fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based screening stra

136 Using an intersectional fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy, we i

137 Using a fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based strategy, we o

138 BONCAT-labeled cells could be isolated with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (BONCAT-FACS) for su

139 Fluorescence-activated cell-sorting, cell-based, and enz

140 Multicolor fluorescence-activated cell sorting could isolate distin

141 tological and biochemical analyses following fluorescence-activated cell sorting demonstrate a positi

142 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-enriched CD133(-)/Ep

143 an All-in-One Cas9(D10A) nickase vector with fluorescence-activated cell sorting enrichment followed

144 marrow Meis1 mRNA and significant defects in fluorescence-activated cell sorting-enumerated monocytes

145 Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

146 Western blot and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

147 me (live cell imaging), separate cells using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and control c

148 present the development of an acoustofluidic fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) device that s

149 In this work, we harness the capacity of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) for multicolo

150 High throughput screening by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) is a common t

151 he embryo to define cell type and includes a fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) procedure tha

152 SmoM2 expressing cells, purified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) via the genet

153 hocytes, cell separation is best achieved by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), although mag

154 defined as CD34(+)VEGR2(+) using traditional fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), are rare cel

155 nanoLCMS proteomics workflow by integrating fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), focused ultr

156 on chromosome 10 (PTEN) was observed both in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-isolated TICs

157 RT-qPCR on Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)-sorted tnfa(+

158 SC chimeras were tetraploid as determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

159 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) allows for ra

160 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis indi

161 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis indi

162 o 5 months of age, followed by histologic or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of m

163 FV-2 showed antibody titers of >1:10(6), and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis reve

164 Furthermore, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and confocal

165 tly infected resting CD4(+) T cells and used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and fiber-opt

166 n vitro contact cocultures, as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and fluoresce

167 fluorescence-based genetic screen utilizing fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and high-thro

168 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and histopath

169 This allows for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and single-ce

170 om normal mouse intestine using DCAMKL-1 and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and subjected

171 sidase under the control of Msx2 promoter by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and surveyed

172 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) confirmed tha

173 Nonmitotic cells were assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) coupled with

174 A direct comparison of this technology with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) demonstrated

175 aploid state for at least five weeks without fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) enrichment of

176 ed from 20 patients with HPT and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for the CD44/

177 e cells isolated from hepatoma cell lines by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) form spheroid

178 as not detectable in clear cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from B1-EGFP

179 eparation based on SSEA-5 expression through fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) greatly reduc

180 lectivity based on yeast surface display and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is developed

181 In order to facilitate genomic analysis, a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) method was de

182 This aptamer enables better separation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of c-kit(+) h

183 their binding to fluorophores, coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of millions o

184 enables enrichment of high-lipid mutants by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of pooled mut

185 Analysis of inflammatory infiltrates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) revealed sign

186 scent protein and nuclease was combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to allow for

187 transcription polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to analyze in

188 ining genes, we employed flow cytometry with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to enrich a t

189 We then use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to individual

190 cle, Maurice et al. (2013) report the use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to perform a

191 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to purify str

192 We employed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to sort for c

193 Cells were isolated and purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using endogen

194 tudying gene expression in cells purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using intrace

195 ir cells sorted based on GFP expression with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and analyzed

196 ative RT-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) of cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and by immun

197 mory B cells are first single-cell-sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and V(D)J tr

198 etry, coupled with the sorting capability of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), can detect,

199 nd their expression levels were confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), GFP visualiz

200 fluidic devices are seamlessly combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), so that indi

201 Upon EGFP-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), the E/sox2:E

202 To study this question, we developed a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)- based assay

203 east cancer, we developed a highly sensitive fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based assay,

204 Using a fluorescent reporter and a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based transpo

205 s, we performed gene expression profiling of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified muri

206 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified Tbx1

207 ), while cytokine production was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

208 Fluorescent yeast cells were selected using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

209 g optical imaging, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

210 munosorbent assay (ELISA) and multiparameter fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

211 sed single cell transcriptional analysis and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

212 e breeding of live oil-rich E. gracilis with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

213 ine incorporation, and cell size assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

214 ate MuSCs from limb muscles of adult mice by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

215 ng histological analysis, real-time PCR, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).

216 ic manner and screened using flow cytometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorting, FACS) for variants

217 and developed a novel flow-cytometry-based (fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FACS) strategy to d

218 ious techniques such as ultracentrifugation, fluorescence-activated cell sorting flow cytometry and r

219 populations using stable isotope tracing and fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by liquid c

220 Here we describe site-specific integration fluorescence-activated cell sorting followed by sequenci

221 t by either laser capture microdissection or fluorescence-activated cell sorting, followed by microar

222 with non-redundant transposon insertions by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for reduced depositi

223 ons were isolated from kidney homogenates by fluorescence-activated cell sorting for whole genome mic

224 bility to reproducibly use cells isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting from human prostate

225 ferent populations of cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from disaggregated l

226 re, we purified HSCs with retinoid-dependent fluorescence-activated cell sorting from eGFP-expressing

227 al and non-neuronal nuclei were separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from postmortem DLPF

228 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting from the skins of tr

229 rt-Seq that combines saturating mutagenesis, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, high-throughput seq

230 od via immunomagnetic enrichment followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE-FACS).

231 thod involving immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE/FACS), a techniq

232 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, immunofluorescence,

233 e-wide gene expression analysis from ex vivo fluorescence-activated cell sorting in MDM4-deficient re

234 or the isolation of idioblast protoplasts by fluorescence-activated cell sorting is established, taki

235 Indeed, the fluorescence-activated cell sorting-isolated EpCAM(+) HC

236 Here we describe live animal fluorescence-activated cell sorting (laFACS), a protocol

237 vation expressly in the transformed cells or fluorescence-activated cell sorting-mediated isolation a

238 ally altering cell phenotypes, we employed a fluorescence activated cell sorting method to isolate ke

239 and they were isolated from each other using fluorescence-activated cell sorting methods.

240 w-cost, and high-performance microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorting (muFACS) technology

241 escent reporter gene with an ochre mutation, fluorescence-activated cell sorting of a library of SUP4

242 The procedure involves fluorescence-activated cell sorting of a library, deep s

243 Four rounds of quantitative screening by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of an error-prone li

244 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of CD24 high versus

245 Here, we applied fluorescence-activated cell sorting of green fluorescent

246 ng IL-17A-producing cells were identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of myeloid versus ly

247 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of nuclei from infec

248 entially methylated loci was performed after fluorescence-activated cell sorting of oligodendrocyte a

249 Upon fluorescence-activated cell sorting, only Prominin-1/Nes

250 s) were isolated as side population cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting or isolated by clona

251 DCs were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting or with immunomagnet

252 ively, in RFP-positive Sk-Hep-1 recovered by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (P < 0.04 vs Mu-APT

253 ssion tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, polymerase chain re

254 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting purification of huma

255 n a small subpopulation of CD133+ cells, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting-purified CD133+ PrEC

256 The in vitro characterization of fluorescence-activated cell sorting-purified cells is co

257 Using gradient centrifugation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting, rat G cells were pr

258 of NKG2D and its ligands were determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, real-time polymeras

259 RH-positive parasites sorted with fluorescence-activated cell sorting resumed growth at 10

260 Analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting revealed that hookwo

261 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting revealed that type I

262 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, RNA sequencing, qua

263 rpin RNA depletion, cDNA overexpression, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting selection.

264 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting showed significantly

265 These results were corroborated by fluorescence activated cell sorting showing a 48% yield

266 thermore, gene expression analysis comparing fluorescence-activated cell sorting-sorted cancer SP cel

267 We show by confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting that amino acids 50

268 We have found by fluorescence-activated cell sorting that increased AC133

269 ng directed in vivo angiogenesis assays with fluorescence-activated cell sorting, thereby confirming

270 morphology on bacterial physiology, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to enrich a library

271 ne expression from labeled cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to generate cell-typ

272 sed them to a starvation stress before using fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify and isol

273 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify circulat

274 were screened in a high-throughput manner by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify clones w

275 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify precurso

276 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate a pure po

277 The library was screened by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate binders t

278 display, enzyme-mediated bioconjugation, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate cells exp

279 We used multicolor fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate different

280 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate each cell

281 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate EGFP(+) c

282 Using CD140a/PDGFRalpha-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate fetal OPC

283 e(X) antigen can be used in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate neurosphe

284 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate reinstate

285 ombination with flow cytometric analysis and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate responses

286 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to measure hepatic l

287 We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to purify these popu

288 The method uses fluorescence-activated cell sorting to screen randomly m

289 chain reaction (qPCR), or immunoblot assays; fluorescence-activated cell sorting was performed to ide

290 After 2 days, fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to enrich f

291 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to isolate

292 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to study th

293 Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting we further show that

294 Next, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we compared gene ex

295 By employing fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we have generated g

296 Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we identified alveo

297 By fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we isolated JG cell

298 CD45(low)CD271+ cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting were enumerated and

299 ELISA and antibody fluorescence-activated cell sorting were used to examine

300 a novel approach that combines the power of fluorescence-activated cell sorting with barcode microar