ライフサイエンスコーパス: local excision

1 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision.

2 ents for women with DCIS treated by complete local excision.

3 ategies are needed to improve the outcome of local excision.

4 hs, 8 (28%) occurred more than 5 years after local excision.

5 and significantly expand the indications for local excision.

6 patients (97%) evaluated by SNLBx underwent local excision.

7 ean age of 63 years (range 44-90), underwent local excision.

8 The third underwent local excision.

9 osis and are effectively treated with narrow local excision (1-cm radius).

10 Eighteen patients underwent a wide local excision, 12 with a paraffin section and 6 with a

11 9 patients (58%) diagnosed by CNBx underwent local excision; 194 of 199 patients (97%) evaluated by S

12 k of metastases and are treated with a wider local excision (2-3 cm).

13 ry breast cancer who were scheduled for wide local excision after triple assessment.

14 Of these, 52 patients were treated by local excision alone and 47 patients by local excision p

15 T2 and T3 cancers treated by local excision alone are associated with unacceptably hi

16 Organ-preservation alternatives are local excision alone for very early tumors, chemoradiati

17 ates were 72% and 66%, respectively, for the local excision alone group and 90% and 74%, respectively

18 However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of l

19 e is much controversy as to whether complete local excision alone is sufficient.

20 Sphincter-sparing local excision and adjuvant radiation is well tolerated

21 cure with sphincter preservation after wide local excision and external-beam irradiation.

22 ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95%

23 a (thickness 1-4 mm) center on the issues of local excision and management of regional lymph nodes.

24 endocavitary irradiation and 86% after wide local excision and radiotherapy.

25 endocavitary irradiation and 88% after wide local excision and radiotherapy.

26 efore this presentation, he underwent a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy for an acral mel

27 She undergoes a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy.

28 This study included 7378 local excisions and 36,116 major resections.

29 the subsequent 6 months, he underwent serial local excisions and topical diphencyprone treatment.

30 s for utilizing FGS: (1) debulking, (2) wide local excision, and (3) whole organ excision.

31 Local excision appears to be an effective alternative tr

32 in patients with DCIS who were treated with local excision are imperfect.

33 T2 adenocarcinomas of the rectum treated by local excision as definitive surgery between 1969 to 199

34 Surgery consisted of primary local excision, as well as dissection for patients with

35 e pathological examination was performed and local excision carried out in all three cases.

36 Local excision (endoscopic or surgical) was compared wit

37 th endocavitary irradiation (n = 20) or wide local excision followed by external-beam irradiation (n

38 Local excision for early colorectal cancer was oncologic

39 utcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cance

40 Local excision for rectal cancer is appealing for its lo

41 t chemoradiation for all patients undergoing local excision for T2 tumors, and for T1 tumors with hig

42 and pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent local excision from 1997 through mid-2006.

43 ductal carcinoma in situ treated by complete local excision; however, there is little evidence for th

44 Local excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternat

45 jority of patients (21 of 25, 84%) underwent local excision (LE) (P < 0.0001).

46 Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after a local excision (LE) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

47 Given the morbidity associated with TME, local excision (LE) for early-stage rectal cancer has be

48 Determine rates of local excision (LE) over time, and test the hypothesis t

49 Recent studies suggest local excision may be acceptable treatment of T1 adenoca

50 at neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preservin

51 After local excision of a primary breast cancer, we conclude t

52 ly tumors, chemoradiation followed by either local excision of a small tumor remnant or, when there i

53 A radical wide local excision of carefully selected early-stage tumours

54 lateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain

55 Local excision of early rectal cancer, even in the ideal

56 or systemic treatment with glucocorticoids, local excision of solitary lesions, radiotherapy, and ch

57 Local excision of T1 and T2 colon cancer was associated

58 SIONS The long-term risk of recurrence after local excision of T1 and T2 rectal cancers is substantia

59 efine the role of adjuvant irradiation after local excision of T1 and T2 rectal cancers.

60 Local excision of T1 rectal cancer did not affect CSS (H

61 Exploratory data suggest local excision of T1-2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant t

62 d on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity.

63 operations were individualized and included local excision of the tumor and suprapancreatic bile duc

64 After local excision of the tumour (1 cm margin) and an axilla

65 re and then 1, 2, 4, and 6 months after wide local excision of thick primary cutaneous melanoma and s

66 ol and recurrence-free survival rates in the local excision only group.

67 d by local excision alone and 47 patients by local excision plus adjuvant irradiation.

68 rising from his left shoulder underwent wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and lymph no

69 Local excision should be reserved for low-risk cancers i

70 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and local excision showed oncological equivalence to major r

71 er, when primary breast cancer is treated by local excision supported by systemic therapy appropriate

72 ques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neoplasms, surgical

73 logical advances have enabled endoscopic and local excision techniques to be applied in the treatment

74 regarding the need for patient selection for local excision, the specific criteria vary among centers

75 For patients whose initial surgery was local excision, those diagnosed before surgery by CNBx h

76 ival was significantly better following wide local excision vs abdominoperineal resection (P = .04),

77 Local excision was approached transanally by removing fu

78 Local excision was performed after preoperative chemorad

79 from patients undergoing mastectomy or wide local excision, we demonstrate the performance of OCME a

80 s, patients with T1 rectal cancer treated by local excision were observed to have a 3- to 5-fold high

81 uorescence surgery for tumor debulking, wide local excision, whole-organ resection, and peritoneal me

82 ic disease, these individuals should undergo local excision with a 2-cm margin and intraoperative lym

83 tients who are most likely to undergo a wide local excision with adequate (>10 mm) tumor-free margins

84 A wide local excision with margin control remains the mainstay

85 Wide local excision with negative pathologic margins is the t

86 ients with T1 or T2 rectal cancers underwent local excision with or without adjuvant irradiation at M

87 he long-term outcomes of patients undergoing local excision with or without pelvic irradiation were e

88 dverse prognostic features treated with wide local excision (WLE) at a single institution between 199

89 Wide local excision (WLE) is a common surgical intervention f

90 Currently, wide local excision (WLE) is the standard of care.

91 ies included Mohs microsurgery (31.1%), wide local excision (WLE) with paraffin section control (21.7

92 udy compared the incidence of ITM after wide local excision (WLE), WLE plus SLND (SLND), or WLE plus