ライフサイエンスコーパス: lysogeny

1 ively higher concentrations avoids restoring lysogeny.

2 t-encoded LexA protein to maintain CTXvarphi lysogeny.

3 ssential for lytic growth and does not alter lysogeny.

4 uction of that for loop breakdown stabilizes lysogeny.

5 acquisition of novel genes, a process called lysogeny.

6 alitatively different behaviours - lysis and lysogeny.

7 by all viruses leads to the establishment of lysogeny.

8 ress transcription of CI from pRM to prevent lysogeny.

9 4- to 5-fold decrease in the probability of lysogeny.

10 sferase is essential for maintenance of 933W lysogeny.

11 centers, but it lacked any obvious genes for lysogeny.

12 sis for the establishment and maintenance of lysogeny.

13 in the lysogens and was necessary for stable lysogeny.

14 s associated with more successful and stable lysogeny.

15 Xphi integration and the factors that govern lysogeny.

16 s and is important for stable maintenance of lysogeny.

17 he Stx2-encoding phages were used to examine lysogeny.

18 onsible for maintaining CI expression during lysogeny.

19 erD, and the recombination sites involved in lysogeny.

20 l for establishment and maintenance of phage lysogeny.

21 us may be regulated by processes that govern lysogeny.

22 standing puzzle concerning the regulation of lysogeny.

23 tes bacterial survival and enables efficient lysogeny.

24 nt site and integrase necessary to establish lysogeny.

25 ng screening of four strains of B. avium for lysogeny.

26 s of elements involved in the maintenance of lysogeny.

27 ro, of bacteriophage 434 that regulate lysis/lysogeny.

28 t gene as seen by the increased frequency of lysogeny.

29 g lysis from sequence diversification during lysogeny, allowing rapid adaptation of phage populations

30 acteriophage with different probabilities of lysogeny and different spontaneous induction rates.

31 ies, including dissociation between rates of lysogeny and FCIC values.

32 These data suggest that maintenance of lysogeny and genome wide stabilisation of mobile element

33 , bacteriophage with higher probabilities of lysogeny and higher induction rates are favored.

34 While the molecular mechanisms underlying lysogeny and induction in bacteriophage have been intens

35 ls), bacteriophage with low probabilities of lysogeny and low induction rates can always invade when

36 re, factors that regulate the switch between lysogeny and lytic growth, e.g., repressor, operator sit

37 , as a tool for investigating the effects of lysogeny and phage resistance on virulence.

38 strengthens repression of lytic genes during lysogeny and simultaneously ensures efficient switching

39 herefore eliminated transductant killing and lysogeny, as did inclusion of citrate and the use of a l

40 Lysogeny Broth medium samples reconstituted in MeOH/H2O

41 ions in the establishment and maintenance of lysogeny by binding to Mu operator DNA to shut down tran

42 In this study, we examined the effect of lysogeny by PhiCD119 on C. difficile toxin production.

43 f bacteriophage Mu establishes and maintains lysogeny by shutting down transposition functions needed

44 f bacteriophage Mu establishes and maintains lysogeny by shutting down transposition functions needed

45 at infection delays lower the probability of lysogeny compared to simultaneous infections.

46 Because lysogeny confers immunity to infection by related viruse

47 ion is analyzed using the phage lambda lysis-lysogeny decision circuit as a model system.

48 teriophage 434 repressor to govern the lysis-lysogeny decision depends on the DNA binding activities

49 lank the immunity region; possibly the lysis-lysogeny decision is more variable among isolates.

50 uilding from this analysis, the lambda lysis-lysogeny decision now serves as a paradigm for how intri

51 ndividual phage infections affects the lysis-lysogeny decision of bacteriophage lambda despite variab

52 oise has been implicated in the random lysis/lysogeny decision of bacteriophage-lambda, in the loss o

53 llular ionic environment influence the lysis-lysogeny decision of the bacteriophage lambda(imm434).

54 tion of genes that determine the phage lysis-lysogeny decision.

55 use a novel strategy in regulating its lysis-lysogeny decisions.

56 a modular format, which includes modules for lysogeny, DNA replication, DNA packaging, structural pro

57 formula that approximates the probability of lysogeny for variable infection times by a time-weighted

58 We found that lysogeny had no effect on any of the in vivo or in vitro

59 he genetic switch mechanism used to regulate lysogeny in bacteriophages.

60 ced looping can influence the maintenance of lysogeny in the lambda repressor system; it can encode s

61 Our arguments suggest that the stability of lysogeny in the lambda-phage may be influenced by such e

62 specific recombination strategy to establish lysogeny, in which a double-stranded recombination subst

63 Establishment of lysogeny involves integration of the phage genome into t

64 of M. smegmatis, but are downregulated once lysogeny is established by binding of RedRock ParB to pa

65 Fine-tuning of the maintenance of lysogeny is facilitated by interactions between CI dimer

66 It has been argued that lysogeny is favoured in phages at low host densities.

67 on, and show that a choice between lysis and lysogeny is first made at the level of the individual vi

68 Lysogeny led to improved adherence to inert surfaces and

69 trate how to overcome these obstacles in the lysogeny maintenance promoter of bacteriophage lambda, P

70 The lysogeny module of phiSa3ms was shown to have some lambd

71 bp deletion was also identified at the gamma lysogeny module, explaining its shift from a temperate t

72 sequence and overall gene content within the lysogeny module.

73 Here we show that lysogeny occurs in natural populations of an autotrophic

74 Initial findings suggest that lysogeny of B. anthracis promotes ecological adaptation,

75 ntation, capsular polysaccharide production, lysogeny of certain bacteriophages, and proteolytic degr

76 izontally acquired genes, Rho also maintains lysogeny of defective and functional prophages.

77 nd within the region, and we demonstrate the lysogeny of Shigella species with STEC bacteriophages.

78 r CRISPR regions in modifying the effects of lysogeny on P. aeruginosa.

79 IC studies do not provide robust measures of lysogeny or consistent evidence of either positive or ne

80 redicted phage genes are expressed either in lysogeny or in lytic growth, 45% of the predicted genes

81 hat provides the phage with an advantage for lysogeny or lytic growth.

82 ted immunity against viruses reemerging from lysogeny or migration.

83 Examination of cross-plaquing and lysogeny profiles further substantiated that each phage

84 The lysogeny promoting protein CII from bacteriophage 186 is

85 raction of chemically inducible cells (FCIC) lysogeny proxy determined using DNA-damaging mitomycin C

86 at have evolved moderately low induction and lysogeny rates will be able to "hedge their bets" agains

87 es, an N6-DNA adenine methyltransferase, and lysogeny-related genes.

88 here provides a new perspective on the lysis/lysogeny switch of bacteriophage lambda.

89 n of the lac operon in E. coli and the lysis/lysogeny switch of phage lambda.

90 hat salt stress can regulate the phage lysis-lysogeny switch.

91 Prophages are phages in lysogeny that are integrated into, and replicated as par

92 ms of a 'hair-trigger' molecular switch from lysogeny to lysis.

93 This epigenetic switch from lysogeny to the lytic state occurs on activation of the

94 to characterise the physiological impact of lysogeny under antimicrobial pressure.

95 rsity, growth rates, and/or the incidence of lysogeny underlie these trends.

96 Lysogeny was found to occur more commonly than lytic inf

97 lytA indicates the widespread occurrence of lysogeny, which may contribute to genetic variation in n

98 en by the inability to reestablish CTXvarphi lysogeny while RstC is overexpressed.

99 We found that lysogeny with MM1-1998 coincided with a more transparent

100 adherence was independently associated with lysogeny with the MM1-1998 phage.

101 I) protein-induced DNA loop maintains stable lysogeny, yet allows efficient switching to lysis.