ライフサイエンスコーパス: peer

1 gnized as an expert in this field by his/her peers).

2 epidemics that seems to draw more heavily on peers.

3 likely to have faltered than taller same-age peers.

4 nts with ASD and 76 age-matched neurotypical peers.

5 poorer academic outcomes compared with their peers.

6 on average 5 y older than their monolingual peers.

7 g difficulties compared with their term-born peers.

8 .10), compared with their lower genetic risk peers.

9 refrontal-subcortical circuit than same-aged peers.

10 not have poorer psychosocial adjustment than peers.

11 lies did not differ from other BCFH-positive peers.

12 peration patients can be compared with their peers.

13 f schoolchildren treated for ADHD with their peers.

14 ents of self-views and likability ratings of peers.

15 the face of social pressure to imitate one's peers.

16 26.7%), significantly lower than population peers (42.5%; 95% CI, 42.2% to 42.8%; P < .001).

17 reast cancer in adulthood than BCFH-negative peers (74% v 33%, respectively; P </= .001).

18 Third, a blunted subjective response to peer acceptance (ie, neutral response to positive feedba

19 task that involved predicting and receiving peer acceptance and rejection feedback, along with asses

20 back task where subjective ratings following peer 'acceptance' or 'rejection' were obtained.

21 on, children with ADHD fare worse than their peers across a wide range of outcomes relating not only

22 s based on trial-by-trial feedback about the peers' actual preferences.

23 our morphing procedure compares favorably to peer algorithms, and can approach goal conformations to

24 lly and/or geographically proximal injecting peers and a person's injection status.

25 ents and adults predicted the preferences of peers and could update their predictions based on trial-

26 nfidential, anonymous feedback evaluation by peers and coworkers regarding wellness and competence wo

27 d expressing emotions) compared with healthy peers and may influence affect, management style and cli

28 ating new ideas and for communicating to our peers and to the public.

29 public school classrooms and enrolled in the Peers and Wellness Study (PAWS), which examined the effe

30 ographically and socially proximal injecting peer, and 22% for each injecting peer who was socially p

31 social learning and natural interaction with peers, and embodiment.

32 ive readmission rates as compared with their peers, and hospitals that used postdischarge heart failu

33 nd fat mass compared with lower genetic risk peers, and they gained weight and fat mass more rapidly

34 The views of peers are important when applying for a faculty position

35 ividual is affected by the behavior of their peers, are central to social science.

36 Although we found significant peer associations overall, those opposing "gain-of-funct

37 er in individuals with lower LTPA than their peers at age 11 (p < 0.05 for all), independent of BMI.

38 ventions, including hygiene data-sharing and peer-based exposure to latrine platform products, had mi

39 = 208; n = 69 with BRCA1/2-positive mother), peers (BCFH negative, n = 112), and their mothers comple

40 ble to randomly modulate mechanisms by which peer behavior is transmitted to a focal individual.

41 experiments to estimate effects of specific peer behaviors.

42 ivated community members who influence their peers' behaviors during CLTS.

43 rs, including a prediction market measure of peer beliefs.

44 ffer significantly from their never-affected peers, both hemodynamically and electrophysiologically.

45 h groups valued talking about the event with peers, but perceived support from senior colleagues and

46 o hold a growth mindset than their wealthier peers, but those who did hold a growth mindset were appr

47 lts were compared with 316 nonrandom healthy peers by using effect sizes ( d).

48 tiveness feedback including data and peer-to-peer coaching improves resident performance, and results

49 ly counterproductive activities for building peer-coaching relationships in the surgical context to i

50 y peer surgical coaches to develop effective peer-coaching relationships with their coachees.

51 is available for surgeons seeking to develop peer-coaching skills.

52 9% to 3.7% (absolute difference, -16.3%) for peer comparison (difference in differences, -5.2% [95% C

53 es, the use of accountable justification and peer comparison as behavioral interventions resulted in

54 icles in the same field and benchmarked to a peer comparison group.

55 cs into patients' electronic health records; peer comparison sent emails to clinicians that compared

56 s steadily associated with conduct problems, peer conflicts, and reduced prosocial abilities.

57 In vivo imaging, which enables us to peer deeply within living subjects, is producing tremend

58 was only countered by pairing oxytocin with peer-derived altruistic norms, resulting in a 74% increa

59 data provide strong support for integrating peer education into comprehensive HIV prevention program

60 activity of the program consisted of peer-to-peer educational interviews between counselors and presc

61 FSW peer educator groups (1 peer educator and 8 participants) were randomized to eit

62 FSW peer educator groups (1 peer educator and 8 participants

63 We randomized 960 participants in 120 peer educator groups from October 18, 2016, to November

64 d questionnaires at 1 and 4 months following peer educator interventions.

65 irect distribution of an oral HIVST from the peer educator), (2) coupon (a coupon for collection of a

66 Peer educator-FSW groups were randomized to 1 of 3 arms:

67 include detainees in care provision through peer-educator programmes in Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Zambia, an

68 METHODS AND Trained peer educators in Kapiri Mposhi, Chirundu, and Livingsto

69 Because peer effects are often confounded with homophily and com

70 Peer effects, in which the behavior of an individual is

71 Peer-elected leaders moderated monthly meetings involvin

72 We illustrate this method with a large peer encouragement design on Facebook for estimating the

73 These findings extend prior work on peer enforcement, highlighting how the enforcement of mo

74 ported altruism measure previously linked to peer evaluations but not behaviour, and on which extraor

75 n the scanner, participants also completed a peer feedback task where subjective ratings following pe

76 ffer an alternative approach to peer review: peer feedback, learning, and improvement (or more succin

77 one through divisions to the 32-cell embryo, peering, for the first time, into the formation of metab

78 FEV1 and FVC compared with African American peers from the third National Health and Nutrition Surve

79 The peer group intervention had beneficial effects on cardio

80 nability of the improvements associated with peer group intervention.

81 Subjects were randomized 1:1 to a peer group-based intervention group (IG) or a self-manag

82 (Peer-Group-Based Intervention Program [Fifty-Fifty]; NCT

83 mentalizing system when socially excluded by peers had less dense friendship networks.

84 basically tend to cooperate when many other peers have previously cooperated.

85 of LTFU patients was selected for tracing by peer health workers.

86 Relative to their peers in prekindergarten programs, children in ParentCor

87 Social factors (e.g., peer influence) and school demands further impact sleep

88 violence victimization, community exposure, peer influences, and fighting.

89 the family and home environment, and healthy peer interactions explained outcome differences, highlig

90 hybridization 'experiments', allowing us to peer into the birth and death of evolutionary lineages.

91 These results allow us to peer into the history of arsenic adaptation of life on o

92 on about the behavior and attitudes of their peers is a strategy commonly employed by those seeking t

93 589 index or peer leaders were randomly assigned to the control group

94 Index or peer leaders, along with two of their network members, w

95 rning, and improvement (or more succinctly, "peer learning"), which they believe is better aligned wi

96 suggest the value in developing and testing peer-led interventions to improve access and adherence t

97 achievement, and our findings on the use of Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) concur.

98 dings, we strongly encourage the adoption of Peer-Led Team Learning in undergraduate Science, Technol

99 home environment, and healthy behaviors with peers mediated the effect of HIGH vs CONTROL (25%-42%).

100 cluded 2 in-person sessions with a volunteer peer mentor while hospitalized, followed by 5 phone call

101 Peer mentoring did not increase reengagement in outpatie

102 The benefits of peer mentoring endured long after the intervention had e

103 Thus, same-gender peer mentoring for a short period during developmental t

104 Peer mentoring has not been rigorously tested.

105 a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a peer mentoring intervention.

106 field experiment investigating the effect of peer mentoring on women's experiences and retention in e

107 50) were randomly assigned to female or male peer mentors or no mentors for 1 y.

108 opmental delay compared with their term-born peers, most marked in the language domain.

109 wa and colleagues discuss a program in which peer navigators support care for people with HIV at a Ke

110 Peer-nominated surgical coaches were provided with train

111 be HPV vaccine-naive than general population peers (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.09; P <

112 due to alcohol-related causes compared with peers of the same age and sex in the general population.

113 trajectory compares with natural aging among peers of the same age without cancer.

114 ating the effects of receiving feedback from peers on posts shared by focal individuals.

115 The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy relies on establishing trust in distr

116 Furthermore, whereas peer punishment increased out-group aggression more than

117 larger effects on behavior if groups promote peer punishment of free riders.

118 Peer ratings of surgical skill varied from 2.6 to 4.8 on

119 amine effects of early maternal deprivation (peer-rearing, PR) in archived rhesus macaque hippocampal

120 or its metropolitan area, and having a valid peer recruitment coupon.

121 nts and formative focus groups who then used peer recruitment coupons to refer subsequent peers to th

122 entify codeveloping processes underlying why peer rejection may lead to more dramatic alterations in

123 t not a more negative subjective response to peer rejection, contributed to anhedonia severity, but o

124 social evaluation, adolescents internalized peer rejection, experiencing a feedback-induced drop in

125 heir self-views from evaluative threats like peer rejection, it is unclear whether adolescents avail

126 p in self-views, whereas adults externalized peer rejection, reporting a task-induced boost in self-v

127 rnational professional societies, requesting peer review and endorsement (by 31 societies listed in t

128 Internet, have been used in conjunction with peer review and publication in journals in the physical

129 etween the Art Exhibition Game and scholarly peer review are discussed and the implications for the d

130 Distortions in peer review are driven by economic forces and enabled by

131 This underscores the limitations of peer review as a means of assessing grant applications i

132 reprint, and validation via a combination of peer review at a journal and additional evaluation by th

133 tion and for maximizing the effectiveness of peer review have not been determined.

134 Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparen

135 Peer review is central to the process through which epid

136 Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing a

137 el approach to case selection and structured peer review leading to actionable quality interventions.

138 may be to establish basic rules that render peer review more transparent, such as publishing the rev

139 enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of research grants, leading to the distribut

140 found that the percentile scores awarded by peer review panels correlated with productivity as measu

141 er of studies have questioned the ability of peer review panels to predict the productivity of applic

142 and weaknesses of American Heart Association peer review practices, and recommends best practices for

143 statement reviews the current literature on peer review practices, describes the current American He

144 ribes the current American Heart Association peer review process and those of other agencies, analyze

145 ing agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.

146 For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcommittee is charged with establishing th

147 that emerging flaws in the integrity of the peer review system are largely responsible.

148 and trust, we have found that scoring-based peer review tends to drive radiologists inward, against

149 Funding source--industry versus peer review versus mixed--did not impact citation rates.

150 , we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the

151 ist performance improvement is scoring-based peer review, which reflects a traditional quality assura

152 h the current dominant approach to radiology peer review.

153 another before sending out a decision after peer review.

154 tive artifacts are evaluated and selected by peer review.

155 rms of biases inherent within the process of peer review.

156 with establishing the highest standards for peer review.

157 uthors also offer an alternative approach to peer review: peer feedback, learning, and improvement (o

158 -date review of the information published in peer-review journals on direct N2O emissions from agricu

159 appropriate prescribing, monthly prescribing peer-review meetings, and brief caregiver education.

160 it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewe

161 utilizing quantitative bias analysis in the peer-review process, editors can potentially avoid unnec

162 show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process, that editors of both genders operat

163 bility of a user is assessed through digital peer-review processes that aggregate ratings into reputa

164 , although many have noted problems with the peer-review system for both manuscripts and grant submis

165 only web-based database available compiling peer reviewed publications and case studies on PFS.

166 me of pathogen-host interactions reported in peer reviewed research articles.

167 A systematic review of 48 peer- reviewed articles with postlicensure data from 24

168 We completed searches of peer-reviewed (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO), internet,

169 in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed abstract at a scientific conference; exami

170 This systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature examines the human hea

171 In this systematic review we searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature publications reporting

172 We searched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary

173 A total of 109 peer-reviewed and original research-oriented dental jour

174 esize indications for DC surgery reported in peer-reviewed articles between 1983 and 2014 into a redu

175 and Embase were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles from January 2007 through Februar

176 To date, 3 peer-reviewed articles have been published after a media

177 to identify US authors who have contributed peer-reviewed articles on a neurosurgery topic that rema

178 English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 1964 and 2016 w

179 sis, data were abstracted from 1303 original peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2011, t

180 NFO were systematically searched to identify peer-reviewed articles published in English before Janua

181 PsychINFO-were searched to retrieve relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English.

182 On average, chairs authored 98 peer-reviewed articles, 2 books, and 11 book chapters.

183 There was limited published peer-reviewed clinical literature available regarding US

184 EXTRACTION: A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

185 A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

186 age restrictions, we systematically searched peer-reviewed databases, searched the grey literature, a

187 Preprints, non-peer-reviewed drafts of manuscripts available on the Int

188 nception through January 2015, including any peer-reviewed English-language publication that describe

189 Peer-reviewed historical and contemporary literatures ar

190 eceased" and "controls" to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles.

191 We included original research published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language.

192 They were also significantly involved in peer-reviewed journal literature, serving as editors (20

193 wing eligibility criteria: be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed ab

194 if they were original studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 yea

195 out the nurses' use of CPGs and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and August 2

196 1965 and March 1, 2016, and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

197 mate effects and of studies not published in peer-reviewed journals to underestimate them.

198 Studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals using both quantitative and quali

199 viral Society-USA reviewed data published in peer-reviewed journals, presented by regulatory agencies

200 able versions of reviewed FS can be cited in peer-reviewed journals.

201 Results were limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals.

202 shed in English from across the world and in peer-reviewed journals.

203 ts who leave residency programs) outcomes in peer-reviewed journals.

204 a free, open-source, open-data, curated and peer-reviewed knowledge base of biomolecular pathways.

205 examination questions using evidence-based, peer-reviewed literature and adheres to accepted psychom

206 ary encode the process science gathered from peer-reviewed literature and regulatory reports.

207 Studies that were published in the peer-reviewed literature and used validated assessment m

208 of 242 microarray studies extracted from the peer-reviewed literature found that current practices fo

209 We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2

210 Available information in the peer-reviewed literature regarding diagnostic efficacy a

211 address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change im

212 h an increase in retracted articles from the peer-reviewed literature, is beginning to erode the trus

213 t base constructed by a team of experts from peer-reviewed literature, users can integrate new data i

214 enealogy" may influence the landscape of the peer-reviewed literature.

215 research papers and reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature.

216 that clinical decisions are informed by the peer-reviewed literature.

217 rst for these regions to be published in the peer-reviewed literature.

218 The increasing amount of peer-reviewed manuscripts requires the development of sp

219 view of global PK indications as reported in peer-reviewed manuscripts.

220 st of the papers included in the review were peer-reviewed proceedings of technological conferences o

221 vers or other second-generation devices in a peer-reviewed publication (by July 1, 2016).

222 To evaluate the available evidence in peer-reviewed publications about the diagnosis and treat

223 account perspectives not usually included in peer-reviewed publications and after-action reports, inc

224 In the past 25 years, over 1800 peer-reviewed publications have focused on SECM, includi

225 English-language, peer-reviewed publications published from January 1, 194

226 Eleven randomized trials (8 peer-reviewed publications, 3 abstract-only presentation

227 positions posed by several policy documents, peer-reviewed publications, organization proposals, and

228 commitments, ClinicalTrials.gov, and matched peer-reviewed publications.

229 , landmines, UXO, and AXO to locate original peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method

230 rched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary data on botulism in c

231 adership, practice, and advocacy, as well as peer-reviewed research, organisation reports, and grey l

232 Based on extensive peer-reviewed research, this statement concludes that tr

233 ies, or presented as conference abstracts at peer-reviewed scientific conferences since the 2014 repo

234 MA guidelines, we did a systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific evidence describing the associa

235 cardiovascular disease based on the existing peer-reviewed scientific literature.

236 In this study, we evaluated 379 peer-reviewed scientific papers to explore how Nmin and

237 We identified no peer-reviewed studies of AXO effects, so we extended the

238 English language, peer-reviewed studies that evaluated an intervention to

239 pating ICU teams adapt data from hundreds of peer-reviewed studies to operationalize a systematic and

240 Peer-reviewed studies with direct comparison of patient

241 nfo electronic databases yielded 40 original peer-reviewed studies.

242 generic recommendations but not tested in a peer-reviewed trial for their manufacturer's ICDs.

243 iorepository; dedicated resources to support peer-reviewed, hypothesis-driven research; access to ded

244 ars ago, in 2005, we did a scoping review of peer-reviewed, published articles on palliative care dev

245 for use by decision makers, risk assessors, peer reviewers and other interested stakeholders to dete

246 cholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their exper

247 y were 1) to find out if and how authors and peer reviewers for dental journals are encouraged to use

248 peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential.

249 abstracts should help authors, editors, and peer reviewers improve the transparency of NPT trial rep

250 We encourage editors and peer reviewers to consider requiring these key data when

251 second of our series of articles celebrating peer reviewers, we talk to Robert Lowe, who is a Lecture

252 er, an external validation of the quality of peer reviews during the laboratory experiment, based on

253 Compared with matched peers, significant impairment of fecal control prevails

254 Compared with matched peers, significant impairment of fecal control prevails

255 ipants to receive psychoeducation (n=153) or peer support (n=151); all (100%) participants had comple

256 rds and the enhanced information sharing and peer support elicited through the group FANC undoubtedly

257 sychoeducation versus optimised unstructured peer support for patients with remitted bipolar disorder

258 -min sessions of group classes, three 30-min peer support groups, and regular telephone follow-ups an

259 Peer support is a proven strategy for many chronic illne

260 ntion are unclear compared with unstructured peer support matched for delivery and aim of treatment,

261 dolescents' developmental wellbeing, promote peer support network among adolescents with the conditio

262 re is no evidence from the trial that either peer support or reminiscence is effective in improving t

263 , supervised LHWs plus an optional 6-session peer support program.

264 Community efforts and peer support programs are needed in addition to provider

265 cards; (b) enhanced information sharing and peer support through the facilitated group process and;

266 (TAU) plus one of the following: one-to-one peer support to family carers from experienced carers (C

267 The presence of caring leaders, peer support, and an organizational commitment to safe,

268 eastfeeding, including professional support, peer support, and formal education, change behavior and

269 ective than similarly intensive unstructured peer support, but was more acceptable and improved outco

270 up psychoeducation or optimised unstructured peer support.

271 tions), abuse and violence, inadequate team (peer) support, problems with workload planning, needle s

272 e compared with 98 (65%) participants in the peer-support group; time to next bipolar episode did not

273 work was developed to examine the strategies peer surgical coaches (n = 8) used to initially cultivat

274 To identify the strategies used by peer surgical coaches to develop effective peer-coaching

275 By identifying the strategies used by peer surgical coaches to operationalize these concepts,

276 Peer surgical coaching is a promising approach for conti

277 increasing resident autonomy, utilizing near-peer teaching, and rewarding educators who facilitate an

278 -of-function" research are more sensitive to peers than are proponents.

279 ere, we introduce remote sensing methods to "peer through" atmospheric contamination using a dense La

280 ns that instead randomly assign individuals' peers to encouragements to behaviors that directly affec

281 y than other BCFH-positive and BCFH-negative peers to report themselves at increased risk (P < .001).

282 peer recruitment coupons to refer subsequent peers to the study.

283 The peer-to-peer (P2P) economy relies on establishing trust

284 al effectiveness feedback including data and peer-to-peer coaching improves resident performance, and

285 he main activity of the program consisted of peer-to-peer educational interviews between counselors a

286 rs, such as risk perceptions of tobacco use, peer use, and tobacco-company influences.

287 Participants completed the Multidimensional Peer-Victimization Scale at 11 and 14 years of age.

288 ranked on their skill level through blinded peer video review and sorted into quartiles of skill.

289 an equal number of matched term born healthy peers were tested.

290 weights did not decline relative to healthy peers when assessed the following academic year.

291 ge skills approaching those of their hearing peers, whereas other children fail to do so.

292 jection increased by 0.4% for each injecting peer who was geographically proximal but not socially pr

293 l injecting peer, and 22% for each injecting peer who was socially proximal but not geographically pr

294 al health than their similarly disadvantaged peers who do not attend college.

295 ree is it nurtured by families and immediate peers who encourage young people to be vigilant and susp

296 th of their spouse compared with age-matched peers who had also lost their spouse and who had lower p

297 Compared with peers who had no neighborhood poverty exposure, those wh

298 uced boost in self-views and deprecating the peers who rejected them.

299 s of alleged obesogenic appetite traits than peers with lower genetic risk at age 6 years, but appeti

300 discovered (>/=7 sten), as compared to their peers without vision defects.