ライフサイエンスコーパス: retinoscopy

1 as compared to the tone found in cycloplegic retinoscopy.

2 active status was confirmed with cycloplegic retinoscopy.

3 efracted in the laboratory by noncycloplegic retinoscopy.

4 with repeat videorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

5 ive errors, measured by standard cycloplegic retinoscopy.

6 or was measured in 75 Labrador retrievers by retinoscopy.

7 gh cycloplegic autorefraction or cycloplegic retinoscopy.

8 acuity (VA), cover testing, and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

9 Cycloplegic retinoscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, slit lamp examinati

10 Each eye's refractive status was measured by retinoscopy along the pupillary axis and at 15 degrees i

11 Refractive errors were measured by retinoscopy along the pupillary axis and at eccentriciti

12 ns were measured along the pupillary axis by retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography, respectively.

13 tive development was assessed by cycloplegic retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography.

14 Refractive development was assessed by retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography.

15 luding choroidal thickness, were measured by retinoscopy and high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography, r

16 ning referral criteria underwent cycloplegic retinoscopy and ophthalmoscopy by the on-site optometris

17 and excellent agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix (0.898).

18 indicated good agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Spot (0.806) and excellent agreement bet

19 The refractive error was measured by static retinoscopy and subjective refraction.

20 opment and axial dimensions were assessed by retinoscopy and ultrasonography, respectively.

21 errors were measured using refractometry and retinoscopy, and axial ocular dimensions, including chor

22 refractive state of each eye measured using retinoscopy, axial dimensions determined with A-scan ult

23 ror (cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed by retinoscopy), best corrected monocular visual acuity (VA

24 Compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy, both devices underestimated hyperopia or ov

25 opic or astigmatic refractive error found on retinoscopy by an amount proportional to the magnitude o

26 refractive error was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy (cyclopentolate 1%).

27 oplegic refraction was measured using streak retinoscopy during an office visit.

28 ) but was in good agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy for cylinder power and axis.

29 Agreement with retinoscopy for the axis of astigmatism more than 0.75 D

30 ly more myopic measurements than cycloplegic retinoscopy for the sphere and spherical equivalent (P <

31 der anesthesia was within 1 D of cycloplegic retinoscopy in 25 subjects (61%) for the sphere, in all

32 retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

33 s assessed every 2 to 3 weeks by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry and corneal videotopography, an

34 minations included cycloplegic refraction by retinoscopy, keratometry measurements, and A-scan ultras

35 ent was assessed along the pupillary axis by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

36 fractive errors was assessed periodically by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

37 ontinuous light were assessed by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

38 power, and axial dimensions were assessed by retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonography, respectiv

39 h any targeted condition were noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), Retinomax autorefractor (Right Manufa

40 Noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, T

41 efractive development was assessed by streak retinoscopy performed along the pupillary axis and at ec

42 Refractive development was assessed by retinoscopy performed along the pupillary axis and at ec

43 acuity (VA), cover testing, and cycloplegic retinoscopy, performed by VIP-certified optometrists and

44 al acuity (BCVA; Snellen's charts), Orbscan, retinoscopy, refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy wer

45 photorefractors correlated with cycloplegic retinoscopy refractive findings for sphere and spherical

46 d to follow-up a month later for cycloplegic retinoscopy, repeat noncycloplegic videorefraction and o

47 n was measured using a modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy technique.

48 n outcome measure was the difference between retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy

49 The average difference between retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy

50 Retinoscopy under anesthesia was within 1 D of cyclopleg

51 ge age of 3.7 years (range, 0.8 to 11 years) retinoscopy under anesthesia yielded significantly more

52 retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy was -0.98 diopters (D) (95% limit of agreeme

53 Nott retinoscopy was performed on 111 subjects in binocular v

54 Modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy was used to measure lag and lead of accommod

55 All children then underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia by an examiner who was unaw

56 uded visual acuity (VA) testing, cycloplegic retinoscopy with subjective refinement if indicated, ocu

57 Within 6 months, streak retinoscopy without cycloplegia was performed under gene