ライフサイエンスコーパス: rotational atherectomy

1 sluminal angioplasty, laser ablation, and/or rotational atherectomy.

2 ablation-induced platelet aggregation during rotational atherectomy.

3 documents the changes in the application of rotational atherectomy.

4 rocedural outcomes for patients treated with rotational atherectomy.

5 in length underwent PTCA, laser ablation, or rotational atherectomy.

6 ectional coronary atherectomy and high speed rotational atherectomy.

7 0.31-1.5]), excimer laser (0.89 [0.29-2.7]), rotational atherectomy (0.96 [0.53-1.7]), and vascular b

8 tional balloon angioplasty (73% vs. 50%) and rotational atherectomy (16.1% vs. 8.3%) were used more o

9 asty (37 +/- 16%, p < 0.001) and lower after rotational atherectomy (27 +/- 15%, p < 0.001).

10 eating calcific stenoses, but the ability of rotational atherectomy alone to optimize lumen dimension

11 pproximately 10% of these procedures include rotational atherectomy, although the national average ra

12 onary atherectomy than in those treated with rotational atherectomy and adjunct balloon angioplasty.

13 hed comparison with 208 lesions treated with rotational atherectomy and adjunct coronary angioplasty

14 reated 165 lesions in 163 patients by use of rotational atherectomy and adjunct directional coronary

15 s and the immediate and long-term results of rotational atherectomy and adjunct directional coronary

16 ospectively evaluated 22 patients undergoing rotational atherectomy and compared their wall motion ab

17 larization was lower in lesions treated with rotational atherectomy and directional coronary atherect

18 There is a synergistic relationship between rotational atherectomy and directional coronary atherect

19 whether adjunctive balloon angioplasty after rotational atherectomy and excimer laser angioplasty pro

20 The combination of rotational atherectomy and intra-coronary stent placemen

21 s article reviews the existing literature on rotational atherectomy and stent implantation for comple

22 +/- 107 degrees to 166 +/- 93 degrees after rotational atherectomy and to 145 +/- 87 degrees after d

23 nal coronary angioplasty, laser angioplasty, rotational atherectomy, and/or stent implantation.

24 Rotational atherectomy burr time was longer in the patie

25 lar ultrasound analysis to determine whether rotational atherectomy causes ablation of non-calcified

26 drug-eluting stents; excisional, laser, and rotational atherectomy devices; devices for crossing tot

27 Rotational atherectomy effectively ablates noncalcified

28 luminal coronary angioplasty, directional or rotational atherectomy, excimer laser angioplasty, or Pa

29 Rotational atherectomy, extraction atherectomy and excim

30 exes suggested facilitated angioplasty after rotational atherectomy for ostial, eccentric, ulcerated

31 e to recovery of baseline wall motion in the rotational atherectomy group (153 min, 95% confidence in

32 line function was significantly lower in the rotational atherectomy group than in the coronary angiop

33 g in 73% of patients (alone in 30% and after rotational atherectomy in 43%), rotational atherectomy i

34 0% and after rotational atherectomy in 43%), rotational atherectomy in 58% (alone in 15% and before s

35 Rotational atherectomy is a safe and feasible technique

36 Rotational atherectomy is best suited for treating calci

37 Rotational atherectomy is currently the preferred treatm

38 rcutaneous techniques such as directional or rotational atherectomy, laser angioplasty, or thrombecto

39 dence intervals, 1.21-1.96; P<0.001), use of rotational atherectomy (OR, 2.37; 95% confidence interva

40 uminal coronary angioplasty, laser ablation, rotational atherectomy, or additional stenting (36% of l

41 gioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, or excimer laser angioplasty.

42 8 (mean +/- 1 SD) to 3.9 +/- 1.1 mm(2) after rotational atherectomy, owing to a decrease in plaque pl

43 the clinical safety and long-term results of rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by low-pressure bal

44 Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an important intervention

45 mer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) versus rotational atherectomy (RA), both followed by adjunct PT

46 s: balloon angioplasty (BA), repeat stent or rotational atherectomy (RA).

47 roup than in the coronary angioplasty group (rotational atherectomy rate constant 0.069 +/- 0.079/min

48 on of recent and early patients treated with rotational atherectomy revealed an increase in the compl

49 ps according to the treatment strategy: CBA, rotational atherectomy (ROTA), additional stenting (STEN

50 ) or after extraction atherectomy (n = 277), rotational atherectomy (Rotablator) (n = 211) or excimer

51 nd utilized angioplasty, stent deployment or rotational atherectomy strategies.

52 After rotational atherectomy, the minimal lumen cross-sectiona

53 age, chronic occlusive disease intervention, rotational atherectomy use, number of stents, hypertensi

54 in 18 patients were imaged before and after rotational atherectomy using intravascular ultrasound sy

55 This study used pre-rotational and post-rotational atherectomy volumetric intravascular ultrasou

56 two groups ([mean +/- SD] 10.3 +/- 6 min for rotational atherectomy vs. 9.6 +/- 4.2 min for coronary

57 We compared an early registry of rotational atherectomy with a recent registry to examine

58 Rotational atherectomy with the Rotablator catheter has