ライフサイエンスコーパス: saccharification

1 ssing this material into fermentable sugars (saccharification).

2 enotype without settling in sugar yield upon saccharification.

3 ulose in response to glucose produced during saccharification.

4 bit substantially facilitated polysaccharide saccharification.

5 pact of cellulose crystallinity on enzymatic saccharification.

6 th increased lignin degradation and improved saccharification.

7 omesticated fungus Aspergillus oryzae, whose saccharification abilities humans have harnessed for tho

8 Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of solid biomass

9 and one acid pretreatment) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation assays showed that woo

10 lly pretreated rice straw under simultaneous saccharification and fermentation conditions.

11 In simultaneous saccharification and fermentation experiments, the engin

12 By using QZ19 for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to D-lact

13 ive energy from dietary fibre depends on the saccharification and fermentation of complex carbohydrat

14 Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of the pretreated and

15 been subjected to hydrothermal pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation procedures to convert

16 equivalent product yields using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with yeast.

17 microorganisms used subsequently for biomass saccharification and fermentation.

18 c profiling, nuclear magnetic resonance, and saccharification assays of the naturally silenced maize

19 Saccharification assays under different pretreatment con

20 ch, resulting in higher glucose release from saccharification assays with or without biomass pretreat

21 Furthermore, low-extent saccharification assays, under different pretreatment co

22 ment conditions (>190 degrees C, 10 min) and saccharification conditions were identified following be

23 of C2-Idf mutants had significantly reduced saccharification efficiencies compared with those of con

24 Lignin is a major factor determining saccharification efficiency and, therefore, is a prime t

25 oduction from switchgrass biomass is the low saccharification efficiency caused by cell wall recalcit

26 LS treatment enhanced enzymatic saccharification efficiency in both BY-2 cells and Arabi

27 Saccharification efficiency is negatively correlated wit

28 A1(A903V) and CESA3(T942I) displayed greater saccharification efficiency than wild type.

29 d significantly improved cell-wall enzymatic saccharification efficiency without a reduction in post-

30 In addition, the mutant shows a higher saccharification efficiency.

31 ts with reduced lignin content and increased saccharification efficiency.

32 substitutions may be modified for increased saccharification for biofuel generation.

33 -treatment resulted in the highest values of saccharification in most of lines tested, suggesting tha

34 Recalcitrance to saccharification is a major limitation for conversion of

35 wever, the frequent lack of efficiency of PB saccharification is still an industrial bottleneck.

36 le substrate, which is the gist of cellulose saccharification, is still unclear.

37 lines that showed heritable improvements in saccharification, mostly with no significant reduction i

38 In the saccharification of a common cellulose standard, Avicel,

39 ytic enzymes have led to new perspectives on saccharification of biomass.

40 Hypocrea jecorina are commonly used for the saccharification of cellulose in biotechnical applicatio

41 for the production of bioethanol in terms of saccharification of essential substrates.

42 e enzymes thus represent novel tools for the saccharification of plant biomass.

43 tails is a major challenge to the biological saccharification of plant cell wall polysaccharides.

44 that occur to cell wall constituents during saccharification of pretreated lignocellulose, particula

45 content of mature stems, and led to improved saccharification of the stem biomass.

46 Efficient saccharification of this biomass to fermentable sugars w

47 Many studies focus on the saccharification of virgin biomass sources, but it may b

48 yield, biomass phenotypic diversity, and for saccharification potential.

49 ed lignin contents increased growth rates or saccharification potential.

50 reased extractability of xylan and increased saccharification, probably reflecting a lower degree of

51 for enzymes and metabolites involved in the saccharification process.

52 Lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose content and saccharification rate showed a wide variation in the tes

53 h water by ~50%, was accompanied by enhanced saccharification rates by up to 5-fold (closest to amorp

54 ngly, in situ DypB activation and subsequent saccharification released nearly 200% more fermentable s

55 ed digestibility or reduced recalcitrance to saccharification, some of the engineered plants exhibit

56 to overcome recalcitrance of the biomass to saccharification (sugar release) to make switchgrass (Pa

57 compositional analysis was complemented by a saccharification test to determine wood cell wall access

58 GVL promotes thermocatalytic saccharification through complete solubilization of the

59 Upon saccharification treatment stems of the uxs3 uxs5 uxs6 t

60 ng genetic lesions responsible for increased saccharification using a deep sequencing approach, and h

61 Traditionally, saccharification was thought to be accomplished by mixtu

62 more glucose released per plant upon limited saccharification when no pretreatment was applied and by

63 l grass Brachypodium distachyon for improved saccharification with an industrial polysaccharide-degra

64 OsAT10-D1 exhibits a 20% to 40% increase in saccharification yield depending on the assay.

65 es have shown a negative effect of lignin on saccharification yield, the characterization of lignin b

66 vels of transgenic plants resulted in higher saccharification yields.