ライフサイエンスコーパス: scanning electron microscope

1 eestanding membrane of 2D materials inside a scanning electron microscope.

2 graphene using a nanomechanical device in a scanning electron microscope.

3 re of kiwifruits slices was examined using a Scanning Electron Microscope.

4 disk microelectrode arrays was inspected by scanning electron microscope.

5 zed by ATR-FTIR spectrometer, goniometer and scanning electron microscope.

6 old nanoparticles followed by imaging with a scanning electron microscope.

7 ith a "nanostressing stage" located within a scanning electron microscope.

8 zing a standardized segment of aorta using a scanning electron microscope.

9 al endothelial structure was examined with a scanning electron microscope.

10 In scanning electron microscope analysis, diminution in sil

11 polynuclear sulfur anions as confirmed from scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray

12 uct nanomechanical experiments in an in situ scanning electron microscope and show that micrometer-si

13 sis, through energy spectrometry utilizing a scanning electron microscope, and by fluorescent microsc

14 as characterized by Atomic force microscopy, Scanning electron microscope, and Raman spectroscopy.

15 ble optical cathodoluminescence emitted in a scanning electron microscope by nanoparticles with contr

16 ing of the nanobiosensor e.g. field emission scanning electron microscope, cyclic voltammetry and ele

17 ted by charge carrier mobility measurements, scanning electron microscope, electron diffraction study

18 essful combination of Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive X-rays th

19 A scanning electron microscope equipped with a focused gal

20 The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) is a direct descenda

21 Using an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM), we observed rupturi

22 y-controlled observation in an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM).

23 and sclera attached, inside an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM).

24 lues is discussed in light of the results of scanning electron microscope examination of the soil sam

25 sing X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and field emission

26 try, cyclic voltammetry (CV), field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) imaging and energy

27 nt analytical techniques like field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) with an energy dis

28 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) figures and fluores

29 he GNPs were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM).

30 un, and the fractography was examined in the scanning electron microscope for mode of failure.

31 Thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, grain size analysis, miner

32 The resolution capability of the scanning electron microscope has increased immensely in

33 Scanning electron microscope images and serial sections

34 Scanning electron microscope images of sample surfaces r

35 Scanning electron microscope images of the bacteria conf

36 Scanning electron microscope images of thin films deposi

37 rescence confocal, transmission electron and scanning electron microscope images show the preferentia

38 Scanning electron microscope images showed that DPSCs at

39 erspectral data sets and the high-resolution scanning electron microscope images were fused into a co

40 Combining in situ through scanning electron microscope images with molecular simul

41 this technique show excellent agreement with scanning electron microscope images, high spatial resolu

42 tituents were mapped using elemental display scanning electron microscope images.

43 The SEM (scanning electron microscope) images showed that the DVB

44 The colony-forming unit counts, scanning electron microscope imaging, and dead:live volu

45 We show that using a standard scanning electron microscope, individual nanoantenna gap

46 scales by optical microscope, environmental scanning electron microscope, nano/microindentation, and

47 targets whose morphology we visualized using scanning electron microscope pictures.

48 Scanning electron microscope results also suggest that p

49 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive

50 orphologies of BNNSs are characterized using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and high-resolution t

51 Using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and micro computed to

52 Cochlear histology was examined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission elec

53 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission elec

54 ogical and structural characterizations by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction

55 This in vitro study compares, by scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination, the surf

56 Installed in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) field emission gun, o

57 To characterize the samples, scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and confocal m

58 tribution of particulates were measured from scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the collect

59 uniformity and higher surface area, based on scanning electron microscope (SEM) images.

60 mography (CT), plasma focused ion beam (FIB) scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging and scanning

61 Evaluation of tissue samples with scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging showed three-

62 ng the secondary electron (SE) signal in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a technique gainin

63 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations indicate

64 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that the int

65 The scanning electron microscope (SEM) stereo imaging techni

66 nocomposites properties were accomplished by scanning electron microscope (SEM), electrochemical impe

67 bes in an atomic force microscope (AFM) or a scanning electron microscope (SEM), optical tweezers, an

68 d by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), quartz crystal micro

69 d labeling of nanoscience images obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM).

70 y-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

71 ite-like features are clearly visible with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

72 The continuous electron beam of conventional scanning electron microscopes (SEM) limits the temporal

73 d composition distribution were analyzed via scanning electron microscope(SEM) and energy dispersive

74 trast, advances in the spatial resolution of scanning electron microscopes (SEMs), which are by far t

75 ural surface analysis of the product under a scanning electron microscope showed an increasingly rigi

76 Additionally, scanning electron microscope study indicated morphologic

77 A scanning electron microscope study of chalcocite (Cu2S)

78 In situ scanning electron microscope tests of individual nanowir

79 situ fracture-toughness measurements in the scanning electron microscope to characterize effects at

80 ackscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique in a scanning electron microscope to non-destructively charac

81 Focused ion beam/scanning electron microscope tomography reveals the key

82 lassification, and additional analysis using scanning electron microscope was performed.

83 Using a scanning electron microscope, we have developed and impl

84 ibution can be observed in the environmental scanning electron microscope, which also reveals the pre