1 e homologs could not be identified by direct
sequence comparison.
2 to be missed or mis-aligned by conventional
sequence comparison.
3 anoxic core viromes using reciprocal BLASTn
sequence comparison.
4 orithms for orthology detection are based on
sequence comparison.
5 rd 'blast' as a verb referring to biological
sequence comparison.
6 ce information contributing to selection for
sequence comparison.
7 in ways that can be documented by molecular
sequence comparison.
8 n placed into different subfamilies based on
sequence comparison.
9 r of pattern-based matches in alignment-free
sequence comparison.
10 100 and 87% of the base pairs determined by
sequence comparison.
11 of mapping in near isogenic lines (NILs) and
sequence comparison.
12 t alternative for measuring approximation in
sequence comparison.
13 tions to other modeling methods that rely on
sequence comparison.
14 ification guidelines that incorporate genome
sequence comparisons.
15 tallography, NMR, mutational experiments and
sequence comparisons.
16 elationship that had been predicted based on
sequence comparisons.
17 ave functions that can be predicted based on
sequence comparisons.
18 e merits of evolutionarily close and distant
sequence comparisons.
19 different protein pair than that favored by
sequence comparisons.
20 ls and cellular pathways, as well as through
sequence comparisons.
21 tency, a novel scoring function for multiple
sequence comparisons.
22 computational biology require alignment-free
sequence comparisons.
23 za strains more accurately than evolutionary
sequence comparisons.
24 ence distance metrics, sequence searches and
sequence comparisons across multiple Illumina data sets.
25 Sequence comparisons across phyla and myosin 2 isoforms
26 Sequence comparisons across the angiosperm lineage provi
27 ate newly sequenced organisms, cross-species
sequence comparison algorithms can be applied to align g
28 The most widely-used pairwise
sequence comparison algorithms for homology detection, s
29 ed statistical benchmark of pairwise protein
sequence comparison algorithms.
30 us sequences beyond the accuracy obtained by
sequence comparison alone (TurboFold II).
31 of the genome that cannot be discerned from
sequence comparisons alone.
32 esented a great challenge to alignment-based
sequence comparison among different virus families.
33 s and proteins are largely unavailable, thus
sequence comparison among homologous genes in present-da
34 Sequence comparison among TuSp1 repetitive units within
35 Protein
sequence comparison among zebrafish GPR81s, mammalian GP
36 Sequence comparisons among an available group of ice wor
37 DNA
sequence comparisons among closely related species allow
38 Genomic
sequence comparisons among human, mouse, and pufferfish
39 In
sequence comparisons among more than 580 influenza A str
40 Sequence comparisons among species combined with domain-
41 Our structure along with
sequence comparisons among SRA1p orthologs and against a
42 Sequence comparison analysis revealed that the six paral
43 Furthermore,
sequence comparison and additional amino acid substituti
44 originate from conventional models of single
sequence comparison and captures essential features of p
45 DNA
sequence comparison and chemical analysis of the cell wa
46 mes faster than methods based on the popular
sequence comparison and database search tools, such as B
47 ics, however, usually only apply to pairwise
sequence comparison and do not examine clusters as a who
48 Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis between Cy
49 Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis showed tha
50 Interestingly, amino acid
sequence comparison and phylogenetic tree construction c
51 ethods to map DNA sequence to feature space,
sequence comparison and prediction models.
52 er genome, and it is not clear a priori from
sequence comparison and similarity which one preserves t
53 Using
sequence comparison and site-directed mutagenesis, we pe
54 Sequence comparison and structural modeling revealed tha
55 Sequence comparison and structure prediction suggest tha
56 Sequence comparison and surface exposure calculations id
57 Through
sequence comparison and the analysis of mutants and chim
58 differences between the PFM and traditional
sequence comparisons and discuss the informatic basis fo
59 been identified in the rat renin promoter by
sequence comparisons and electrophoretic mobility shift
60 xanthus lspA (lspA(Mx)) genes, we conducted
sequence comparisons and found that they contained nearl
61 Based on primary
sequence comparisons and genomic context, Npun_F4153 (Si
62 Sequence comparisons and homology modeling of the struct
63 Based on structure-
sequence comparisons and modeling, a two-stage mechanism
64 Sequence comparisons and molecular modelling studies wer
65 e combined novel coloration analyses, coding
sequence comparisons and mRNA expression level studies t
66 ta, multiple-genome alignments, pre-computed
sequence comparisons and other specialized analysis trac
67 Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses were perf
68 Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis suggest t
69 Protein
sequence comparisons and phylogenetic inference suggest
70 Sequence comparisons and protein modeling suggest that a
71 e resistin family is not observed in primary
sequence comparisons and strongly suggests a distant evo
72 Primary
sequence comparisons and x-ray structural analyses of tw
73 lts highlight the practical utility of close
sequence comparisons,
and the loss of sensitivity entail
74 gh-throughput sequencing data and other bulk
sequence comparison applications have motivated a search
75 Alignment-free
sequence comparison approaches have been garnering incre
76 Classical notions for
sequence comparison are increasingly being replaced by o
77 Cross-species
sequence comparisons are a prominent method for analyzin
78 Primate genomic
sequence comparisons are becoming increasingly useful fo
79 In this paper, pairwise
sequence comparisons are shown to be more powerful than
80 Sequence comparison as well as motif prediction and muta
81 m species have been identified by amino acid
sequence comparisons,
as well as structural predictions
82 Results of protein
sequence comparison at open criterion show a very large
83 DNA
sequence comparisons at three loci suggest that this Spi
84 By
sequence comparison,
bacterial and eukaryotic FMNAT enzy
85 Based on primary
sequence comparisons,
beta subunits are predicted to be
86 Finally,
sequence comparison between an enzyme that catalyzes a r
87 Sequence comparison between human and the cartilaginous
88 genes for common disease: large-scale direct
sequence comparison between patients and controls.
89 Sequence comparison between resistant and susceptible P.
90 , and so the border can also be located by a
sequence comparison between species.
91 This structural similarity is supported by
sequence comparison between the schistosome myosin II he
92 ion has recently been tested by gene and DNA
sequence comparisons between humans and chimpanzees, bet
93 Genomic
sequence comparisons between individuals are usually res
94 Sequence comparisons between the N- and C-domains of MVL
95 of conservation, an observation supported by
sequence comparisons between the St.
96 We also make genome-level and
sequence comparisons between these taxa and the horsesho
97 phylogenetic incongruence in protein-coding
sequence comparisons between vertebrate taxa.
98 Sequence comparisons,
biochemical experiments, and studi
99 of human evolution can be inferred from DNA
sequence comparisons,
but this requires an accurate esti
100 te the use of a new score for alignment-free
sequence comparison,
called the score.
101 Our findings suggest that ungapped
sequence comparisons can predict regulatory elements gen
102 We have designed a pipeline of
sequence comparison,
clustering and functional annotatio
103 Analogous to biological
sequence comparison,
comparing cellular networks is an i
104 Primary amino acid
sequence comparisons demonstrate that R. sphaeroides Rpo
105 Sequence comparisons demonstrated overlapping diversity
106 PFM
sequence comparison demonstrates a statistically signifi
107 Sequence comparison demonstrates that this allele is rel
108 ate sequences, making alignment-based genome
sequence comparison difficult.
109 High stringency
sequence comparison (
e < 1 x10(-25)) of 157 group 5L-spe
110 Sequence comparisons,
employing structural insights, sug
111 Amino acid
sequence comparison exhibited a 24% similarity between t
112 Structural and
sequence comparisons,
exploiting biological data on rela
113 ations are generated using an integration of
sequence comparison,
fold recognition, and grid-computin
114 lustered based on an all-versus-all pairwise
sequence comparison,
followed by the generation of conse
115 Sequence comparisons for this cluster across many genoty
116 Sequence comparisons found that the B2' region exhibits
117 Sequence comparisons further disclosed four Na(+),H(+)-P
118 From structure-guided
sequence comparison,
Glu-280 was identified as a signatu
119 Sequence comparison has indicated that CTTNBP2 N-termina
120 Amino acid
sequence comparisons have been made between all of 25,19
121 MCR-1 mechanistic studies were done with
sequence comparisons,
homology modelling, and electrospr
122 We also report that the original
sequence comparison identified five virus isolates, each
123 Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad
124 These studies combined with bioinformatics
sequence comparison identify SBPs from five putative tra
125 Sequence comparison in a wide range of species showed th
126 ieve this approach can be scaled up to allow
sequence comparison in the whole-genome coding regions a
127 s in the mutational process; however, recent
sequence comparisons indicate that mutational input alon
128 Genomic and
sequence comparisons indicate that the I-mf and HIC gene
129 Sequence comparisons indicate that these are likely to b
130 etabolic potential of CPR bacteria, although
sequence comparisons indicate that these capacities are
131 Sequence comparisons indicate that this type of "bifunct
132 Sequence comparisons indicated that active-site residues
133 Sequence comparisons indicated that only the C-terminal
134 Sequence comparisons indicated that RFHVMn and KSHV deve
135 -CoV and porcine CoV nucleoproteins, because
sequence comparisons indicated that SARS-CoV N protein h
136 Sequence comparison indicates that Tat-D is conserved ac
137 Sequence comparison indicates that the virus is closely
138 ch NGS data, word-count based alignment-free
sequence comparison is a promising approach, but for thi
139 One of the common tasks involving
sequence comparison is sequence clustering.
140 Cross-species DNA
sequence comparison is the primary method used to identi
141 According to
sequence comparison it belongs to the low m.w. glutenin
142 Indeed, based on mitochondrial DNA
sequence comparisons it was recently argued that chimpan
143 Based primarily on 16S rRNA
sequence comparisons,
life has been broadly divided into
144 WSeqKernel, just like any alignment-based
sequence comparison method, depends on a substitution ma
145 Protein
sequence comparison methods are routinely used to infer
146 Therefore,
sequence comparison methods remain essential for the det
147 However, production usage of
sequence comparison methods that preprocess the database
148 equence alignments generated by conventional
sequence comparison methods.
149 mance when used in the context of evaluating
sequence comparison methods.
150 Analogous to
sequence comparison,
network comparison aims to provide
151 fungi than to plants, and the global protein
sequence comparison,
now made possible by the genome seq
152 we have used the RNASTRUCTURE algorithm and
sequence comparison of 105 enterovirus sequences to prov
153 A
sequence comparison of CCR5 and CCR2b identified a diver
154 Sequence comparison of five sea urchin species reveals t
155 Sequence comparison of human and mouse SCN8A identified
156 Through
sequence comparison of hypoxia-responsive genes, COX-2 p
157 Based on the amino acid
sequence comparison of mammalian and other lower vertebr
158 f orthologous groups determined by an expert
sequence comparison of NAC genes from both monocots and
159 Sequence comparison of natural ACRs and engineered Cl(-)
160 A time-
sequence comparison of NHANES data from 1998 through 200
161 e searching, read mapping and alignment-free
sequence comparison of nucleic-acid sequences; our imple
162 Sequence comparison of nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (a
163 Sequence comparison of orthologous regions enables estim
164 Functional Domains (FDs), FD1-FD3, based on
sequence comparison of PiSLF and PiSLF-like proteins, an
165 nformation, show promising results in genome
sequence comparison of prokaryotes.
166 Sequence comparison of Sia-dependent and Sia-independent
167 Sequence comparison of TCRs from conventional memory T h
168 Sequence comparison of the capsular polysaccharide synth
169 Sequence comparison of the GP1 proteins suggests that th
170 Sequence comparison of the juxtamembrane region identifi
171 By using
sequence comparison of the transmembrane domains of PAR1
172 Sequence comparison of the VP7 gene of G9 strains identi
173 Sequence comparison of these diverse myomixer orthologs
174 Finally, a
sequence comparison of these epitopes with the hundreds
175 Sequence comparison of these two stealth family proteins
176 Sequence comparison of tumorigenic and tumor-attenuated
177 Structure and
sequence comparisons of alpha, beta, and gamma clustered
178 This result, together with
sequence comparisons of animal and invertebrate PMKs, su
179 es and synthetic model complexes, along with
sequence comparisons of both iron- and cobalt-type NHase
180 The DNA
sequence comparisons of mtDNA CR appear to be a valid me
181 To learn how well ungapped
sequence comparisons of multiple species can predict cis
182 Finally,
sequence comparisons of NL isoforms allow for mapping th
183 Sequence comparisons of pfkB proteins from the model pla
184 late binding in the AtIPMDH2 active site and
sequence comparisons of prokaryotic and eukaryotic IPMDH
185 Sequence comparisons of segments Seg-1 to Seg-10 show th
186 d for expression was identified in silico by
sequence comparisons of seven nematode species, demonstr
187 Drosophila melanogaster, in combination with
sequence comparisons of TEs from two related species, D.
188 DNA
sequence comparisons of the 21 H. influenzae sodC genes
189 Amino acid
sequence comparisons of the CPBs made by 8 randomly sele
190 DNA
sequence comparisons of the ends of CTnBST, the joined e
191 Sequence comparisons of the promoters identified a 57-ba
192 Amino acid
sequence comparisons of the rice and Arabidopsis superfa
193 Structural and
sequence comparisons of the two enzyme families revealed
194 unction, we performed nucleotide and protein
sequence comparisons of Vps33 homologues in different sp
195 In this study we have used
sequenced comparisons of the Hoxa2 locus from 12 vertebr
196 RNA
sequencing comparison of VEC-null and VEC-positive cells
197 sed and alignment-free) have been applied to
sequence comparison-
one of the most fundamental issues i
198 ious approaches, which are based on pairwise
sequence comparisons,
our method explores the correlatio
199 our Spaced Words approach to alignment-free
sequence comparison,
pattern sets calculated with rasbha
200 Sequence comparison predicted conserved extracellular DR
201 Such annotations are valuable for antibody
sequence comparison,
protein structure modelling and eng
202 rototype for a new class of inteins based on
sequence comparisons,
reactivity, and mechanism.
203 rgent homologous sequences for cross-species
sequence comparison remains a challenge.
204 The current K-string-based protein
sequence comparisons require large amounts of computer m
205 n site prediction algorithms and sequence-to-
sequence comparisons;
results are used to characterize s
206 Sequence comparisons reveal diagnostic amino acid residu
207 Although
sequence comparisons reveal many differences between the
208 Amino acid
sequence comparisons reveal that BsrDI and BtsI belong t
209 Sequence comparisons reveal that the EP protein possesse
210 Sequence comparisons reveal that the other members of th
211 Sequence comparisons reveal that Vibrionaceae species po
212 tests with insertion mutants, combined with
sequence comparisons,
reveal functions for the products
213 Sequence comparison revealed a 2-bp insertion in the cod
214 A
sequence comparison revealed an extra proline in the TM2
215 Multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome
sequence comparison revealed that M16917 is a member of
216 Sequence comparison revealed that PaSLFx was completely
217 Sequence comparison revealed that the Bph32 gene shares
218 Sequence comparison revealed the miR167 target site on I
219 In addition, structural and
sequence comparisons revealed large similarity with MPs
220 Sequence comparisons revealed that all but the mandarin
221 Sequence comparisons revealed that TE-derived human miRN
222 Sequence comparisons revealed that the analogous interfa
223 Sequence comparisons revealed the MKS1 catalytic triad,
224 Finally,
sequence comparison reveals that only primate species ca
225 Gene
sequence comparisons reveals very strong purifying selec
226 Based on
sequence comparisons,
SA12 is most closely related to BK
227 A
sequence comparison search of GenBank using BLASTP revea
228 er of bacterial taxa, based on 16S rRNA-gene
sequence comparison,
shared between humans and dogs, two
229 However, amino acid
sequence comparisons show pervasive genomic mosaicism, a
230 Sequence comparisons show that it has shed a large porti
231 Genomic and IRT
sequence comparisons show that other introns have been p
232 Sequence comparisons show that proline content for bacte
233 Sequence comparison showed that both CLR proteins share
234 Sequence comparison showed that the extracellular domain
235 A subsequent
sequence comparison showed that these nonhomologous alle
236 Sequence comparisons showed that 168, its siblings (122,
237 Sequence comparisons showed that nine of the genome segm
238 Sequence comparisons showed that some Vbetas from distan
239 Homology
sequence comparisons showed the presence of the LDEVFL a
240 lographic analysis complemented by sensitive
sequence comparisons shows that PriX is a diverged homol
241 The BLAST software package for
sequence comparison speeds up homology search by preproc
242 Second,
sequence comparisons suggest that Fv1 has been involved
243 Sequence comparisons suggest that LpxL shares distant ho
244 Sequence comparisons suggest that reappearance of HCV RN
245 Structural and
sequence comparisons suggest that some eukaryotic and ba
246 Sequence comparisons suggest that the current distributi
247 Genome
sequence comparisons suggest that the yydFGHIJ operon ma
248 Sequence comparisons suggested that analogous peptide se
249 Previous protein-
sequence comparisons suggested that Dictyostelium is evo
250 Sequence comparisons suggested that the catalytic mechan
251 Sequence comparisons suggested that the protein may bind
252 ene is currently unknown but a cross-species
sequence comparison suggests an important role, as it is
253 Sequence comparison suggests that BluB is a member of th
254 Sequence comparison suggests that the electrostatic envi
255 Sequence comparison suggests that the ryanodine receptor
256 Sequence comparison suggests that Xenopus Wnt11-R, not W
257 We also showed using whole-genome
sequence comparison that C. albicans strains can persist
258 dynamic programming approach for model-free
sequence comparison that incorporates high-throughput ch
259 We present a tool for DNA/DNA
sequence comparison that is built on the HMMER framework
260 ined by reverse Southern analysis and direct
sequence comparisons that most of the dumpy gene has evo
261 Despite
sequence comparisons that predict that SET1 family enzym
262 ly introduced a physically based approach to
sequence comparison,
the property factor method (PFM).
263 Although eluding simple
sequence comparisons,
the DDBH2 domains share the only s
264 There is undeniable value in using
sequence comparison to identify putative regulatory sequ
265 aditional approaches have relied on pairwise
sequence comparisons to construct graphs, which were the
266 Sequence comparisons to human Kaposi's sarcoma-associate
267 Here, we use multispecies
sequence comparisons to identify a common SNP (rs642961,
268 itions of recently determined structures and
sequence comparisons to infer that both bacterial and sp
269 earches were combined with iterative protein
sequence comparisons to obtain a current picture of the
270 tering out redundancy and putative paralogs,
sequence comparisons to orthologous groups, instead of t
271 with the variation in residue type from the
sequence comparison,
to generate 3D templates of the cat
272 son and classification, given the arsenal of
sequence comparison tools developed by computational bio
273 or poorly conserved ncRNAs than conventional
sequence comparison tools.
274 framework that is complementary to existing
sequence comparison tools.
275 h conventional phenotypic assays and GenBank
sequence comparisons using the 16S rRNA target.
276 Based on an expert NAC
sequence comparison,
we propose forty orthologous groups
277 By inter-species
sequence comparisons,
we detected 27 highly conserved no
278 Structural results, combined with amino acid
sequence comparisons,
were used to identify conserved fe
279 of sequence similarities seen by amino acid
sequence comparison,
which is surely an underestimate of
280 d potency trends are compatible with protein
sequence comparisons,
while modeled kinase binding site
281 Sequence comparison with orthologs in other plant specie
282 Furthermore, using
sequence comparison with strictly coupled XylEEc and sim
283 se superfamily by a comprehensive amino acid
sequence comparison with structurally authenticated memb
284 gion-encoding genes were determined by using
sequence comparison with the ImMunoGeneTics database, an
285 We use
sequence comparison with the primate and rodent lineages
286 in the RVRp22 genome based on a full-length
sequence comparison with the RVRp13, VR2332, and MLV gen
287 mutants were rationally engineered based on
sequence comparison with the three other P450 2B enzymes
288 Based on a
sequence comparison with the wild relative Fragaria vesc
289 Sequence comparison with two enzymes of known structure
290 interactions, derived by isostericity-based
sequence comparisons with 3D RNA motifs from the RNA x-r
291 proach that integrated multispecies (n = 11)
sequence comparisons with algorithm-based transcription
292 Sequence comparisons with another family in the FLSF tha
293 By exploiting cross-species
sequence comparisons with in vitro and in vivo enhancer
294 Structure-based
sequence comparisons with other AB5 toxin family members
295 Sequence comparisons with other Tec-family kinases sugge
296 This, in addition to structural and
sequence comparisons with putative MenD orthologues, pro
297 annotated by identifying their homologs via
sequence comparisons with reference or curated proteins.
298 Sequence comparisons with related Erynnis suggest that p
299 6 in the RVRp22 genome based on full-length
sequence comparisons with RVRp13, VR2332 (the parental v
300 Structural considerations and
sequence comparisons would suggest that IGFL proteins ar