ライフサイエンスコーパス: serologic

1 Definitive diagnosis remains serologic.

2 We collected clinical, serologic, (1)H-MRS PDFF, and liver biopsy data from 94

3 Serologic analyses showed that the 93 isolates cross-rea

4 lar diagnostic assays and highly multiplexed serologic analyses, as well as the development of animal

5 Following immunization of mice, serologic analysis demonstrated that the covalently coup

6 Usually, immunoglobulin M (IgM) serologic analysis is not sufficiently specific to confi

7 We compared findings from serologic analysis with findings from biopsy analyses, f

8 patients, and 5 were identified by means of serologic analysis, all in samples obtained 13 days or m

9 but who test negative by reference 2-tiered serologic analysis.

10 Serologic and cerebrospinal fluid testing confirmed the

11 ficiency virus, which were ruled out through serologic and clinical examinations.

12 Therefore, it is important to include serologic and direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosti

13 Both serologic and genetic data show an association between P

14 cteristics, treatments, clinical course, and serologic and genetic markers.

15 A diagnosis of celiac disease based on serologic and histologic evidence requires patients to b

16 ated with tumor viral status, as assessed by serologic and immunohistochemical testing.

17 Serologic and immunologic deficits were most frequent in

18 The data also suggest that serologic and molecular testing using blood and cerebros

19 Serologic and neutralization responses against the spike

20 In this report, the serologic and phylogenetic relationships of the Uukuniem

21 in mCRC demonstrated that it safely induced serologic and T-cell responses.

22 disease is made based on clinical, genetic, serologic, and duodenal morphology features.

23 cted Fs antigen was confirmed in structural, serologic, and flow-cytometric studies.

24 We provide morphological, serologic, and genetic evidence that Upolu virus (UPOV)

25 Symptomatic, serologic, and histological outcomes evaluated gluten to

26 going integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produc

27 Clinical, serologic, and virologic features were compared between

28 The clinical, serologic, and virologic features were compared between

29 Results of urine culture, serologic,and polymerase chain reaction testing were pos

30 ns can have practical implications, altering serologic approaches to allergen testing and bringing a

31 Serologic approaches to diagnosis remain inaccurate, and

32 Using the same serologic assay, we compared the estimated anti-HEV immu

33 Serologic assays can potentially produce precise exposur

34 ity explain why, in some cases, conventional serologic assays do not correlate with disease activity,

35 f historical perspective on the evolution of serologic assays for Lyme disease and provides a summary

36 validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have low sensitivity in early HTBRF.

37 logy-a rate comparable to the error rate for serologic assays.

38 y, antibody maturation was evaluated using 3 serologic assays: the BED capture enzyme immunoassay (CE

39 ve homologous helminth proteins in IgE-based serologic assessment of allergic disorders in a helminth

40 A combination of baseline basophil and serologic biomarkers defined a subset of patients in whi

41 To identify novel serologic biomarkers of malaria exposure, we evaluated r

42 h deliberate sting challenges and to monitor serologic changes for up to 2 years.

43 ction in human fetal brain tissue along with serologic confirmation proves the vertical transmission

44 We investigated the incidence of serologic conversion and of new cases of celiac disease

45 Subjects were included if they met serologic criteria for syphilis (ie, a positive nontrepo

46 We estimated the levels of serologic cross-reactivity among humans primed with seas

47 Based on serologic cross-reactivity of H3N8 EIV from different li

48 Serologic cross-reactivity, a hallmark of orthopoxvirus

49 f occurrence in the same geographic regions, serologic cross-reactivity, and similar but often less s

50 Serologic data indicated that MERS-CoV was circulating i

51 rs associated with narcolepsy, together with serologic data, collectively point to an autoimmune orig

52 ed on a retrospective review of clinical and serologic data, including therapeutic response.

53 creasing days of illness, demonstrating that serologic detection methods are best utilized during pre

54 osis of Lyme disease in the United States is serologic detection of antibodies against Borrelia burgd

55 Serologic determination of human leukocyte antigen antib

56 females; mean age: 42.7 years) with previous serologic diagnosis of HIV, from the acquired immunodefi

57 -on-a-chip point of care (POC) assay for the serologic diagnosis of human Lyme disease.

58 Definitive serologic diagnosis of the infection during gestation is

59 ights the ongoing challenges associated with serologic diagnosis of ZIKV infection.

60 (ELISA) has been proposed as an alternative serologic diagnostic test to the indirect immunofluoresc

61 ic DQalpha/beta combination within the donor serologic DQ specificity that were different from the do

62 s is greater than what is apparent using the serologic equivalents.

63 ck-borne infection in the United States, and serologic evaluation for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorf

64 , to April 1, 2016, in blinded comprehensive serologic evaluation for autoantibody profiles to aid th

65 Serologic evaluation for Zika virus (ZIKV) infection cur

66 008, to June 30, 2010, comprehensive service serologic evaluation performed on 54853 patients with un

67 Reproductive histories and serologic evaluations were used to determine menopausal

68 Blood samples were tested for serologic evidence of CD.

69 1 asymptomatic recipient in each cluster had serologic evidence of exposure that decreased over time.

70 However, serologic evidence of exposure to an orthopoxvirus was d

71 Of 849 participants, 73.4% had serologic evidence of exposure to CMV (89.0% black and 6

72 nfected children, but not HEU children, lack serologic evidence of immunity to MMR, despite documente

73 ome consistent with Balamuthia infection and serologic evidence of infection.

74 autoinflammatory signs and symptoms without serologic evidence of inflammation as part of an atypica

75 or 4 d, chimeric mice developed clinical and serologic evidence of liver failure and lactic acidosis.

76 Records of 302 patients with serologic evidence of recent T gondii infection (a posit

77 atory from June 2004 through August 2010 for serologic evidence of recent Toxoplasma gondii infection

78 hese, 35 patients (88%) had molecular and/or serologic evidence of recent ZIKV infection in the serum

79 and T. pallidum from none; one woman showed serologic evidence of syphilis.

80 examinations on 290 of 454 individuals with serologic evidence of T gondii infection during the epid

81 associates with poor allograft outcomes and serologic evidence of viral infections and alloimmunity.

82 These findings do not support routine serologic examination for Borrelia in uveitis patients.

83 ss onset may have a role in the clinical and serologic expression of juvenile myositis.

84 However, reports that suggest high rates of serologic false positives and low levels of viremia have

85 rotonin release in the absence of heparin, a serologic feature characteristic of delayed-onset HIT (i

86 c features correlated best with clinical and serologic features of dAIH.

87 FD affects symptoms, histology, immunity, or serologic features of patients with celiac disease.

88 these models, the one which has the closest serologic features to PBC is a mouse with a T-cell-restr

89 er cardiac bypass surgery, share a number of serologic features with HIT Abs, including platelet acti

90 nd study their association with clinical and serologic features.

91 en-detected celiac disease based on positive serologic findings found initiation of a gluten-free die

92 Patients with positive serologic findings underwent intestinal biopsies.

93 Based on clinical and serologic findings, the genetic defect was detected by m

94 sults on standard (18)F-FDG PET and negative serologic findings.

95 ore was a useful tool in predicting positive serologic findings.

96 s inability to cross-tabulate histologic and serologic findings.

97 The distribution of these alleles within a serologic group varies, with some alleles being more fre

98 The serologic hallmark of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), t

99 ration biopsy data report no linkage between serologic Hashimoto's thyroiditis and thyroid cancer, ye

100 Serologic HBV markers, including hepatitis B surface ant

101 lpha/beta allele combinations with the donor serologic HLA-DQ antigens.

102 formed, 147 patients had antibodies to donor serologic HLA-DQ antigens.

103 istent children were more likely to elicit a serologic immune response, and both infection groups had

104 men and control women mount similarly robust serologic immune responses to IIV, with no significant d

105 der two opposing models to explain long-term serologic immunity.

106 In addition, serologic incidence predictions from cross-sectional sam

107 e influence of pretransplant weight loss and serologic indicators of nutritional homeostasis on relap

108 titers were associated with a lower risk of serologic infection (P = .01) and maintenance of antibod

109 Serologic infection was defined as a 4-fold increase in

110 titers were associated with protection from serologic infection.

111 Serologic investigations and systemic work-up results we

112 rapy and medical treatment on the level of a serologic marker of inflammation (high-sensitivity C-rea

113 We evaluated serologic markers from these pathways in a case-control

114 , numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes, or serologic markers of celiac disease.

115 We assessed associations of serologic markers of monocyte activation, soluble CD163

116 The development of serologic markers specific to CD has revolutionized the

117 specificity and kinetics of these potential serologic markers.

118 r a minimum of 18 months, using clinical and serologic measures of disease activity.

119 should be evaluated serially by Fibroscan or serologic measures of fibrosis.

120 Serologic measures of increased intestinal permeability

121 e of glomerular dysfunction and conventional serologic measures, even in patients with other manifest

122 a and Ehrlichia species with blood smear and serologic methods in an upper Midwest population.

123 been the development and validation of host serologic microbial biomarkers, which have achieved a di

124 osylation has been suggested as a marker for serologic monitoring of liver disease and hepatocellular

125 ombined smooth muscle cells were excluded by serologic neutralization.

126 The human serologic observations supported the translational relev

127 y was observed among clinical specimens with serologic or molecular markers for various unrelated blo

128 Therefore, the clinical and serologic parallels to APS-I in patients with thymomas a

129 g only smokers found no correlations between serologic parameters and demographic or clinical paramet

130 , histopathologic (Banff classification) and serologic parameters were compared between both groups b

131 IP.4mut suggest utility as an immunogen or a serologic probe; moreover, the specific four alterations

132 MBO130 has a unique serologic profile; has as much alphaGlcNAc as 11F, 11B,

133 ing monoclonal antibodies show that 6X11 has serologic properties of 6B/6D, whereas 6X12 has 6A/6C.

134 has four known members (6A-6D) with distinct serologic properties, homologous cps loci, and structura

135 dentified specific aortic autoantigens using serologic proteomic studies.

136 We evaluated the serologic reactivity of the paired sera to R. rickettsii

137 We find that serologic reactivity to dengue 1 virus (DENV1) EDIII bef

138 strains requires knowledge of antigenic and serologic relationships between MERS-CoV and other CoVs.

139 However, after long-term clinical and serologic remission, approximately 11 years after initia

140 prospective cohort study was to compare the serologic response between human immunodeficiency virus

141 Maternal serologic response during pregnancy after adequate syphi

142 ase are small bile ducts, and the prototypic serologic response includes antimitochondrial antibodies

143 Serologic response rates following 3 doses of tOPV for b

144 Factors that negatively influenced serologic response rates were high doses of immunosuppre

145 ectively, these data suggest that a positive serologic response to HPV16 oncoproteins may be the best

146 ectively, these data suggest that a positive serologic response to HPV16 oncoproteins may be the best

147 however, a marginal 7% increase (P=.065) in serologic response to poliovirus type 1 was observed.

148 V infection did not impact the likelihood of serologic response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.001; P

149 e modeling were used to assess predictors of serologic response to treatment at 180 days and 400 days

150 Serologic response to treatment should be evident by 6 m

151 We assessed factors that influenced the serologic response to vaccination.

152 t and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and serologic responses (using neutralization assays) agains

153 PsA-TT generated robust tetanus serologic responses in 1- to 29-year-olds, similar to th

154 rnia/07/2009 influenza vaccines, we analyzed serologic responses of participants stratified by BMI gr

155 alpha blocker use was associated with better serologic responses than other immunosuppressive drugs.

156 Lyme disease is done by determination of the serologic responses to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens, wi

157 compromised patients showed moderate to good serologic responses to hepatitis A vaccination, but may

158 n long-term memory by measuring cellular and serologic responses to measles.

159 Little is known about the serologic responses to Pneumocystis jirovecii major surf

160 Human serologic responses to S. aureus and their relationship

161 We utilized ELISA to measure the IgM and IgG serologic responses to three overlapping recombinant fra

162 ca assessed whether PsA-TT generated tetanus serologic responses when tested in African populations (

163 cocorticoids showed the poorest clinical and serologic responses.

164 grans lesion or a positive standard 2-tiered serologic result in a patient with symptoms compatible w

165 In this context, serologic results correlated with the likelihood of sign

166 Serologic results in contacts who were sampled 13 days o

167 dular ocular and systemic manifestations and serologic results in men compared to women.

168 Serologic results suggest that further spread of this ou

169 e 450 subjects of Group I disclosed positive serologic results, presence of DQ2 and/or DQ8 alleles an

170 he prior season was indicated by both VE and serologic results.

171 identified by latent class analysis by using serologic, RT-PCR, and GM data.

172 ficant patient-centered barriers that impede serologic screening and contribute to the delayed detect

173 Objective: To assess the evidence on serologic screening and preventive interventions for gen

174 1, 2004 to October 31, 2014, in whom routine serologic screening for Borrelia burgdorferi (IgG as det

175 nt-centered barriers have a role in impeding serologic screening for celiac disease in individuals fr

176 All participants underwent serologic screening for celiac disease using the IgA tis

177 type was determined at 15 months of age, and serologic screening for celiac disease was evaluated at

178 Conclusions and Relevance: Serologic screening for genital herpes is associated wit

179 Serologic screening for genital herpes was associated wi

180 ation: The USPSTF recommends against routine serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asympto

181 uded that the harms outweigh the benefits of serologic screening for genital HSV infection in asympto

182 ence on the accuracy, benefits, and harms of serologic screening for HSV-2 infection in asymptomatic

183 es; studies evaluating accuracy and harms of serologic screening tests for HSV-2; RCTs assessing prev

184 nd the available evidence on the accuracy of serologic screening tests, the USPSTF concluded that the

185 Despite the availability of inexpensive serologic screening tests, ~85% of individuals with celi

186 cipate in the study (Group I), and underwent serologic screening.

187 tribution of molecular equivalents within DQ serologic specificities.

188 DSA (IgM, IgG3, and IgG) refers to the same serologic specificity.

189 Most recent serologic specimen was used to determine measles seropro

190 ation, and clinical data were abstracted and serologic specimens collected.

191 alyzed the impact of donor and recipient EBV serologic status on overall survival, relapse-free survi

192 HBV serologic status was determined for 126 (91%) of 139 res

193 the B. pertussis receptors was obtained from serologic studies demonstrating pertussis patient serum

194 Even though serologic studies have shown that children are exposed t

195 culture, histopathologic examination, and/or serologic studies.

196 Serologic study results revealed glutamic acid decarboxy

197 ne exhibited different associations based on serologic subtype adds to the expanding knowledge base i

198 A large cross-sectional serologic survey was conducted in the Netherlands during

199 d repeated clinical surveys for active yaws, serologic surveys for latent yaws, and molecular analyse

200 Serologic surveys were conducted from May 2013 to Decemb

201 timated by national vaccination coverage and serologic surveys.

202 No validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have

203 Although the availability of a commercial serologic test for ZIKV has greatly expanded the nationa

204 ies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are the serologic test of choice for diagnosing celiac disease (

205 of having a normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.58-13.22).

206 viduals with normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result.

207 ormal mucosa (Marsh stage 0) but positive CD serologic test results (IgA/IgG gliadin, endomysium, or

208 The donor had positive serologic test results for E. cuniculi.

209 ASDs) and celiac disease (CD) or positive CD serologic test results, but larger studies are contradic

210 osis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test.

211 a second stage of the study and undergo new serologic testing (Group II).

212 Combining the BAT with routine serologic testing allows classification of patients with

213 proach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques when C

214 ocused systemic medical evaluation including serologic testing and imaging studies.

215 amined rates and factors associated with HBV serologic testing and vaccination rates in adults infect

216 ia should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing s

217 Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

218 Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and serologic testing at the Centers for Disease Control and

219 for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hosp

220 nificant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers.

221 e relatives from Group II that underwent new serologic testing disclosed eight sero-converted subject

222 Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains th

223 Serologic testing for B. miyamotoi was performed using a

224 t, C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin, serologic testing for celiac disease, and age-appropriat

225 % took antiretroviral prophylaxis, 23.8% had serologic testing for hepatitis B and 43.1% for hepatiti

226 To discuss recent advances in serologic testing for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associate

227 we present our initial experiences with ZIKV serologic testing from a national reference laboratory p

228 In addition to suggestive symptoms, serologic testing has high diagnostic reliability and bi

229 Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical

230 Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndr

231 CD4 percentage between last vaccine dose and serologic testing independently improved the cumulative

232 In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may

233 inal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01)

234 Detection of brucellosis currently relies on serologic testing of an antibody response to Brucella in

235 Cytomegalovirus serologic testing of enrolled mothers was performed to d

236 To improve vaccine strain selection, human serologic testing on vaccination-induced cross-reactivit

237 The majority of patients had no record of serologic testing prior to biopsy, and evidence of posit

238 HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver cli

239 The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enz

240 Serologic testing revealed a high prevalence (29 of 81;

241 Serologic testing ruled out toxoplasmosis, rubella, cyto

242 Serologic testing shows that antibodies to this region c

243 The application of imaging techniques and serologic testing such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 may

244 Current diagnostic methods rely on serologic testing that are complicated by cross reactivi

245 endocrinologist and a standardized panel of serologic testing that included serum insulin-like growt

246 The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of season

247 termined on the basis of testing history and serologic testing to have been recently infected.

248 ness among North Carolina residents and that serologic testing using R. rickettsii antigen may miss c

249 Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children.

250 Serologic testing was performed for all 782 children inc

251 Results of serologic testing were not predictive of relapse.

252 Ophthalmic and systemic evaluations and serologic testing were performed on all infants.

253 Two barriers to serologic testing were significant across the participan

254 Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider orde

255 s were systematically collected for culture, serologic testing, antigen detection, and molecular diag

256 ldhood were followed for up to 38 years with serologic testing, imaging, and noninvasive fibrosis mar

257 Serologic testing, including examination of serotype-spe

258 Serologic testing, including plaque reduction neutraliza

259 HBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV gen

260 disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing.

261 t celiac disease symptoms, risk factors, and serologic testing.

262 ure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing.

263 a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR and serologic testing.

264 verall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing.

265 reaction assay (RT-PCR), viral isolation, or serologic testing.

266 t components is an important step in allergy serologic testing.

267 erformed for each patient within 2 months of serologic testing.

268 A total of 146 adult patients with CF had serologic tests (ImmunoCap total IgE, specific Aspergill

269 Novel serologic tests allowed for the detection of otherwise u

270 tified 671 MSM with available results of HCV serologic tests and with an HIV genotypic resistance tes

271 We propose that serologic tests based on VMPs are of additional value in

272 Newer diagnostic tools, including serologic tests for antibodies against tissue transgluta

273 Only 2 studies of serologic tests for celiac disease involving 62 and 158

274 c disease; studies on diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease.

275 S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serologic tests for detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodie

276 Serologic tests have a greater sensitivity, but their re

277 Based on serologic tests of a community population for celiac dis

278 chistosomiasis (based on positive results of serologic tests or detection of ova) and 17 healthy cont

279 with results of laboratory testing, such as serologic tests or polymerase chain reaction.

280 Retrospective serologic tests suggested that HHV-8 was likely transmit

281 In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisyntheta

282 Molecular and serologic tests were performed to diagnose CRT infection

283 disease (identified by positive results from serologic tests) had lower mean levels of vitamin B-12 a

284 e detection of intracellular morulae) and on serologic tests, both of which have recognized limitatio

285 collected to perform rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, culture, and molecular tests for potent

286 anti-MERS-CoV antibodies by at least 2 of 3 serologic tests, in addition to 2 fatal cases identified

287 of US Food and Drug Administration-approved serologic tests, such as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fo

288 of interlaboratory variability of several LD serologic tests-whole cell sonicate (WCS) enzyme-linked

289 0,425 adults with positive results from both serologic tests.

290 We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.

291 f 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests.

292 mab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests.

293 tures of LAM (i.e., clinical, radiologic, or serologic), the guideline panel made conditional recomme

294 ANCA vasculitis and then focus on clinical, serologic, therapeutic and mechanistic aspects of four m

295 rom patient isolates correlated with initial serologic titers and with mortality in murine pneumonia.

296 Following treatment, nontreponemal serologic titers should decline in a stable pattern, but

297 A lack of serologic tools has hindered targeted studies of transmi

298 exposure, and also inform the development of serologic tools to monitor gametocyte exposure in popula

299 Serologic (total and A fumigatus-specific IgE), pulmonar

300 Interpretation of serologic, urine and biopsy studies is complicated by ox