ライフサイエンスコーパス: serologic test

1 osis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test.

2 f 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests.

3 course of the disease, diagnosis is based on serologic tests.

4 riteria, despite an increase in requests for serologic tests.

5 mplemented simple acceptability criteria for serologic tests.

6 -infected individuals undetected by standard serologic tests.

7 HIV-1 and HCV in blood earlier than standard serologic tests.

8 dardization of the present generation of IgM serologic tests.

9 determined by culture or subsequent standard serologic tests.

10 reactive test result by newer enzyme-linked serologic tests.

11 code proteins not included in routinely used serologic tests.

12 mab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests.

13 0,425 adults with positive results from both serologic tests.

14 We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.

15 al pertussis infection based upon additional serologic testing.

16 from reflex samples originally submitted for serologic testing.

17 earned that they have genital herpes through serologic testing.

18 egionella pneumophila exposure, according to serologic testing.

19 before infection in children was detected by serologic testing.

20 ed to clinical microbiology laboratories for serologic testing.

21 rase chain reaction and for coronaviruses by serologic testing.

22 complete follow-up, and 23% in each year had serologic testing.

23 595, one third of which was attributable to serologic testing.

24 ts, high-resolution computed tomography, and serologic testing.

25 n efficacy and underwent unnecessary, costly serologic testing.

26 disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing.

27 t celiac disease symptoms, risk factors, and serologic testing.

28 ure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing.

29 a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR and serologic testing.

30 verall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing.

31 reaction assay (RT-PCR), viral isolation, or serologic testing.

32 t components is an important step in allergy serologic testing.

33 erformed for each patient within 2 months of serologic testing.

34 ted, and their partners were invited for HSV serologic testing.

35 of office visits, 11 and 7; median number of serologic tests, 4 and 4; and median days of antibiotic

36 At the first serologic test, 641 were HBeAg positive and 893 were ant

37 Incidence was determined by applying a serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversio

38 The serologic testing algorithm for recent human immunodefic

39 the remaining California counties using the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent Seroconversion (S

40 Novel serologic tests allowed for the detection of otherwise u

41 Combining the BAT with routine serologic testing allows classification of patients with

42 Serologic testing also revealed possible cases of Lyme b

43 ion in the United States by conducting HHV-8 serologic testing among participants of the Transfusion-

44 proach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques when C

45 these 14, only 5 (35.7%) sought appropriate serologic testing and counseling for active immunization

46 cross-sectional study was undertaken of EBV serologic testing and histories of IM and sexual behavio

47 y limited data on risk in the current era of serologic testing and human leukocytes antigen typing to

48 ocused systemic medical evaluation including serologic testing and imaging studies.

49 plantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosi

50 Genotyping is a powerful adjunct to serologic testing and is superior for typing transfused

51 s with positive results of M. pneumoniae IgM serologic testing and no alternative diagnosis were cons

52 cellent correlation between contemporary EBV serologic testing and the BioPlex 2200 system.

53 amined rates and factors associated with HBV serologic testing and vaccination rates in adults infect

54 ia should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing s

55 Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

56 The added value of serologic tests and inflammatory markers in clinical ass

57 New serologic tests and molecular techniques are being added

58 lthough the application of a large number of serologic tests and more stringent donor questioning has

59 ronic relapsing brucellosis as determined by serologic tests and the patient's clinical picture.

60 use in future research or as an antigen for serologic tests and vaccines, the extent of structural c

61 tified 671 MSM with available results of HCV serologic tests and with an HIV genotypic resistance tes

62 iagnostic evaluation (including cultures and serologic tests), and analysis of lymph node tissue.

63 re tested; 100 (20.4%) reacted on at least 1 serologic test, and 65 (13%) were determined to be posit

64 Mice were assayed for infection by culture, serologic testing, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) a

65 visits, number of physicians seen, types of serologic tests, and days of antibiotic treatment; 2) oc

66 b. microti polymerase-chain-reaction assays, serologic tests, and questionnaires.

67 of the most sensitive and specific screening serologic tests (anti- tissue transglutaminase antibodie

68 s were systematically collected for culture, serologic testing, antigen detection, and molecular diag

69 A number of serologic tests are available commercially for identifyi

70 gnosis relies on intestinal biopsy findings, serologic tests are useful as screening tools and as an

71 f class I than single-mutant cells, based on serologic tests, as well as a significantly diminished s

72 Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and serologic testing at the Centers for Disease Control and

73 discuss the diagnostic use and potential of serologic tests based on detection of antibodies to MTB

74 Serologic tests based on this antigen will identify peop

75 We propose that serologic tests based on VMPs are of additional value in

76 for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hosp

77 nificant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers.

78 e detection of intracellular morulae) and on serologic tests, both of which have recognized limitatio

79 2 to 1995, 17 laboratories performed 100,000 serologic tests costing $7.1 million on Maryland residen

80 collected to perform rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, culture, and molecular tests for potent

81 hepatitis C, and biochemical blood tests and serologic tests currently have only modest value in pred

82 antibody test-positive histories on approved serologic tests, demonstrating that RT-nPCR was probably

83 Serologic tests developed in the last decade provide a n

84 Serologic tests developed in the past decade provide a n

85 e relatives from Group II that underwent new serologic testing disclosed eight sero-converted subject

86 t on the understanding and interpretation of serologic testing during pregnancy and the perinatal per

87 ructs elicit antibodies detected by standard serologic tests (enzyme immunoassays, rapid tests, and W

88 he sensitivity and specificity of commercial serologic tests (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELIS

89 No validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have

90 tart empirical IBS treatment and (2) perform serologic test for CS followed by endoscopic biopsy for

91 mmercially available microimmunofluorescence serologic test for the detection of Chlamydophila pneumo

92 Although the availability of a commercial serologic test for ZIKV has greatly expanded the nationa

93 There is no evidence to support serologic testing for anti-HBs in this context.

94 Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains th

95 Serologic testing for B. miyamotoi was performed using a

96 d biopsy results with results for concurrent serologic testing for celiac autoantibodies.

97 t, C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin, serologic testing for celiac disease, and age-appropriat

98 Serologic testing for chronic parasitic infections is of

99 their first-degree family members underwent serologic testing for different autoantibodies.

100 re collected through personal interviews and serologic testing for H. pylori antibodies.

101 % took antiretroviral prophylaxis, 23.8% had serologic testing for hepatitis B and 43.1% for hepatiti

102 Recent reports have indicated that serologic testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patient

103 Serologic testing for HEV infection should be performed,

104 years of age were interviewed and underwent serologic testing for HIV and HSV-2.

105 Serious limitations of these data are that serologic testing for HTLV has a high false positive rat

106 The diagnosis was established by serologic testing for IgM and IgG antibodies to La Cross

107 Despite almost universal use in this study, serologic testing for LD did not appear to influence tre

108 Serologic testing for LD was performed for 36 patients (

109 ents seen for tick bites, 95 (67%) underwent serologic testing for LD.

110 Because clinicians routinely order serologic testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroups

111 e attempted to clarify the clinical value of serologic testing for Lyme disease using the results of

112 To discuss recent advances in serologic testing for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associate

113 Newer diagnostic tools, including serologic tests for antibodies against tissue transgluta

114 We describe a recombinant antigen for use in serologic tests for antibodies to Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-

115 atients did not significantly cross-react in serologic tests for Borrelia burgdorferi.

116 etermined the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for CD.

117 Only 2 studies of serologic tests for celiac disease involving 62 and 158

118 c disease; studies on diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease.

119 S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serologic tests for detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodie

120 Results of serologic tests for heparin-induced antibodies were posi

121 Serologic tests for hepatitis A, B, and C viruses were n

122 The positive predictive value of the serologic tests for Kaposi's sarcoma was 82 percent, and

123 To ascertain use of serologic tests for Lyme disease (LD) in Maryland, all l

124 rols may minimize false-positive results for serologic tests for Lyme disease, and these tests must b

125 chemiluminescence) are probably superior to serologic tests for predicting hemolytic disease of the

126 rlor in Bangkok, Thailand, were interviewed; serologic tests for sexually transmitted infections were

127 High-titer serologic tests for syphilis are uncommon, and prozone r

128 es were low; the use of glycoprotein G-based serologic tests for the measurement of HSV-1 and HSV-2 a

129 we present our initial experiences with ZIKV serologic testing from a national reference laboratory p

130 a second stage of the study and undergo new serologic testing (Group II).

131 disease (identified by positive results from serologic tests) had lower mean levels of vitamin B-12 a

132 In addition to suggestive symptoms, serologic testing has high diagnostic reliability and bi

133 Campylobacter jejuni infection, detected by serologic tests, has been implicated in some acute immun

134 Serologic tests have a greater sensitivity, but their re

135 luded nucleic acid detection, viral culture, serologic testing, histopathologic evaluation, and immun

136 straightforward and uses commonly available serologic tests; however, the signs and symptoms of celi

137 ldhood were followed for up to 38 years with serologic testing, imaging, and noninvasive fibrosis mar

138 A total of 146 adult patients with CF had serologic tests (ImmunoCap total IgE, specific Aspergill

139 act identification; pre- and postvaccination serologic testing in contacts and infants, respectively;

140 Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical

141 Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndr

142 -transcription polymerase chain reaction, or serologic testing in the prospective groups, and 61 were

143 anti-MERS-CoV antibodies by at least 2 of 3 serologic tests, in addition to 2 fatal cases identified

144 Patients underwent echocardiography and serologic testing including C-reactive protein (CRP).

145 Serologic testing, including examination of serotype-spe

146 Serologic testing, including plaque reduction neutraliza

147 Sensitive and specific serologic tests, including those for anti-transglutamina

148 CD4 percentage between last vaccine dose and serologic testing independently improved the cumulative

149 Serologic testing is essential for the diagnosis of some

150 lichiosis and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.

151 sis (HGE) and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.

152 In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may

153 Serologic testing is not useful early in the course of L

154 Serologic testing is usually unable to provide evidence

155 Serologic testing may be more useful in later disease, a

156 ble comparing RIPA to commercially available serologic test methods.

157 s, using viral culture, electron microscopy, serologic testing, molecular analysis, and histopatholog

158 amined by testing plasma from 43 horses with serologic test-negative histories and no known contact w

159 inal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01)

160 ies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are the serologic test of choice for diagnosing celiac disease (

161 Detection of brucellosis currently relies on serologic testing of an antibody response to Brucella in

162 Cytomegalovirus serologic testing of enrolled mothers was performed to d

163 ly with distinct clinical phenotypes, making serologic testing of great diagnostic aid.

164 ) with rNS1 as the antigen was evaluated for serologic testing of laboratory rodents.

165 termine the presence of leptospiral DNA; and serologic testing of serum from patients and rats by mic

166 Early serologic testing of the recipient pretransplant and pro

167 we conducted chart reviews, interviews, and serologic testing of thoracic-surgery patients at the tw

168 Based on serologic tests of a community population for celiac dis

169 To improve vaccine strain selection, human serologic testing on vaccination-induced cross-reactivit

170 Syphilis is diagnosed by serologic testing or by identification of the causative

171 chistosomiasis (based on positive results of serologic tests or detection of ova) and 17 healthy cont

172 with results of laboratory testing, such as serologic tests or polymerase chain reaction.

173 tic process must be optimized to ensure that serologic tests perform adequately.

174 The number of serologic tests performed declined by 25% after implemen

175 06 through 9 February 2007, and we performed serologic tests, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysi

176 The majority of patients had no record of serologic testing prior to biopsy, and evidence of posit

177 HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver cli

178 The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enz

179 ilis prevention, as indicated by nonreactive serologic tests (rapid plasma reagin and fluorescent tre

180 studies due to the reported insensitivity of serologic tests relative to antigen detection methods.

181 HBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV gen

182 of having a normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.58-13.22).

183 viduals with normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result.

184 ormal mucosa (Marsh stage 0) but positive CD serologic test results (IgA/IgG gliadin, endomysium, or

185 st cases, antibiotics were prescribed before serologic test results became available.

186 Serologic test results for C. trachomatis antibodies in

187 tion (PCR) and immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG serologic test results for confirming BTV cases.

188 The donor had positive serologic test results for E. cuniculi.

189 dividuals with normal mucosa but positive CD serologic test results was 3.09 (95% CI, 1.99-4.80).

190 ASDs) and celiac disease (CD) or positive CD serologic test results, but larger studies are contradic

191 ononuclear cells (PBMCs) to confirm positive serologic test results.

192 greement between the real-time PCR assay and serologic test results: 19.8% (19/96) and 13.7% (29/212)

193 f the genus flavivirus mandates caution when serologic testing results are interpreted.

194 Serologic testing revealed a high prevalence (29 of 81;

195 Serologic testing revealed both ganglionic neuronal acet

196 A tests as well as the introduction of rapid serologic tests (RT) and HIV nucleic acid amplification

197 Serologic testing ruled out toxoplasmosis, rubella, cyto

198 oved by enhancing HCV detection, with annual serologic testing, screening with HCV RNA to detect acut

199 We studied 7046 pregnant women whom serologic tests showed to be at risk for herpes simplex

200 Serologic testing shows that antibodies to this region c

201 The application of imaging techniques and serologic testing such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 may

202 of US Food and Drug Administration-approved serologic tests, such as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fo

203 These serologic tests suggest that Granulibacter immunoreactiv

204 Retrospective serologic tests suggested that HHV-8 was likely transmit

205 Current diagnostic methods rely on serologic testing that are complicated by cross reactivi

206 ld adopt policies on student vaccination and serologic testing that conform to ACIP recommendations a

207 endocrinologist and a standardized panel of serologic testing that included serum insulin-like growt

208 Serologic tests that provide results rapidly could overc

209 induced infections of dogs were confirmed by serologic testing, tissue culture isolation, and PCR amp

210 The role of serologic testing to confirm cure of Helicobacter pylori

211 Serologic testing to detect H. pylori immunoglobulin G (

212 We used molecular methods, culturing, and serologic testing to diagnose and ascertain the cause of

213 The use of serologic testing to diagnose Lyme disease (LD) is a sou

214 The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of season

215 termined on the basis of testing history and serologic testing to have been recently infected.

216 There are no generally accepted serologic tests to confirm the disease.

217 syphilis is challenging and often relies on serologic tests to detect treponemal or nontreponemal an

218 In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisyntheta

219 d recommendation of techniques to be used in serologic testing, training in virus isolation, and proc

220 e a faster and less expensive alternative to serologic tests used in reference laboratories.

221 Results of serologic tests used to diagnose H. pylori should be int

222 lated antigens in addition to gag and env in serologic tests used to identify HTLV-infected individua

223 ness among North Carolina residents and that serologic testing using R. rickettsii antigen may miss c

224 t further standardization, variability among serologic tests using E. equi and HGE agent isolates for

225 Serologic testing, viral culture, and molecular methods,

226 Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children.

227 Of 23 people on whom serologic testing was conducted, eight were seroreactive

228 sions, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, or serologic testing was done.

229 Serologic testing was performed 12 and 20 months after s

230 Serologic testing was performed for all 782 children inc

231 HIV serologic testing was performed, and the presence of ris

232 the reliability of the glycoprotein G-based serologic tests, we evaluated HSV-1 and HSV-2 enzyme imm

233 Results of serologic testing were not predictive of relapse.

234 Ophthalmic and systemic evaluations and serologic testing were performed on all infants.

235 Two barriers to serologic testing were significant across the participan

236 o treatment status but counsellors doing the serologic testing were.

237 Biochemical and serologic tests were best at predicting no or minimal fi

238 Alcohol consumption, demographics, and serologic tests were correlated with degrees of steatosi

239 Results of viral serologic tests were negative.

240 Molecular and serologic tests were performed to diagnose CRT infection

241 sis was obtained when culture, skin PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing wi

242 Serologic testing, when available, requires antigen prep

243 of interlaboratory variability of several LD serologic tests-whole cell sonicate (WCS) enzyme-linked

244 Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider orde

245 PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing with skin PCR was almost as sensitive

246 of Lyme borreliosis (LB) is commonly made by serologic testing with Western blot (WB) analysis servin