戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tive histological examination and a positive serological test.
2  protein 22 (ADAM22) or ADAM23 was used as a serological test.
3  or GABA(B2) receptor subunits was used as a serological test.
4 able encephalitis that can be diagnosed by a serological test.
5 the urgent need for a specific and sensitive serological test.
6 cant increase to the pre-test probability of serological tests.
7  transcription-polymerase chain reaction and serological tests.
8 lly infected, and of the cost per sample for serological tests.
9 a combination of self-reported adherence and serological tests.
10 re currently identified by using culture and serological tests.
11  B. recurrentis and used recombinant GlpQ in serological tests.
12 e Disease recommended a two-step approach to serological testing.
13 onths, blood samples were taken for repeated serological testing.
14 e the efficiency, ease, and effectiveness of serological testing.
15 rvey and underwent home-based phlebotomy for serological testing.
16 itative polymerase chain reaction assays and serological testing.
17 id testing (NAT) are comparable to those for serological testing.
18 tive, and economically viable alternative to serological testing.
19 ty of two PCR tests (groEL and recD) and two serological tests (adsorption enzyme immunoassay [EIA] a
20 questionnaire and provide a blood sample for serological testing against five recently circulating in
21     WDEIA in children cannot be ruled out by serological tests alone.
22 t incorporating rKR95 and rTR18 with rK39 in serological tests amenable to rapid or high-throughput s
23 revalence of HBV infection was determined by serological testing and analysis among noninstitutionali
24 ns, observing the clinical course, obtaining serological testing and appreciating the MRI features.
25  within 2 years before and after the date of serological testing and to identify vaccinees.
26                                              Serological tests and chemical analysis of the major pol
27 ent viable therapy and even with advances in serological tests and markers, the duodenal biopsy remai
28  and prognostic tests have commonly examined serological tests and new imaging techniques.
29                                              Serological tests and small bowel biopsy remain the corn
30 e correlations among viruses and vaccines in serological tests and the power of HA sequence in predic
31  included comparing performance of different serological tests and to determine whether the suggested
32 autoimmune disease by histological analysis, serological testing, and clinical recurrence during foll
33  is an immunogenic protein with utility as a serological test antigen for discriminating tick-borne r
34           In diagnosing celiac disease (CD), serological tests are highly valuable.
35 roscopy of a perilesional biopsy specimen or serological tests are needed for exact diagnosis.
36 his extended spectrum may enhance autoimmune serological testing as an aid to preoperative thymoma di
37                                              Serological testing at the New York State Department of
38 nts with typhoid fever, the sensitivity of a serological test based on the detection of anti-lipopoly
39 omen (n=2421) matched to exposed subjects on serological test date and age (+/-3 years).
40 al measurements (e.g., body mass index), and serological tests (e.g., viral load).
41 m causing mycetoma is difficult; no reliable serological test exists but molecular techniques to iden
42 cial need for a rapid and sensitive in vitro serological test for BoNT/A to replace the current in vi
43                         The development of a serological test for foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)
44                        To develop a specific serological test for relapsing fever, we created a genom
45                                  The current serological test for tularemia is based on agglutination
46                                 We performed serological testing for anti-HBs and microRNA-155 and as
47           We discuss the diagnostic value of serological testing for anti-PLA2R and tissue staining f
48                                              Serological testing for antibodies to Ct antigens is pot
49 sing patients who were H. pylori positive on serological testing for H. pylori IgG-antibodies were ra
50 r sexual and social activities and underwent serological testing for herpes simplex virus types 1 and
51                                              Serological testing for HLA class I antigens was perform
52 a community-based research center, underwent serological testing for human immunodeficiency virus and
53                                              Serological testing for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodie
54                                              Serological testing for KIR4.1-specific IgG is unlikely
55                                              Serological testing for Trypanosoma cruzi was performed
56                                      Current serological tests for Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection
57                                              Serological tests for pancreatic cancer are little used,
58                                              Serological tests for the various clinical manifestation
59                                              Serological tests form a vital part of a multifactorial
60                                           No serological test had predictive value greater than 40% f
61  test for microbial diagnosis, with directed serological testing (i.e., Q fever serology, Bartonella
62                                  In Atlanta, serological testing identified a new virus.
63                        PCR amplification and serological testing identified the infecting species as
64 ven the lower sensitivity and specificity of serological tests in the aged population, clinical suspe
65 study was to assess the performance of these serological tests in the presence of gastric neoplasia.
66 ory diagnosis for Lyme disease is two-tiered serological testing, in which a reactive first-tier enzy
67 ed the disease after similar challenges, and serological testing indicated that transmitted bacteria
68                                              Serological tests indicated that HNF-1alpha was present
69                                     Prior to serological testing, influenza viruses are typically pro
70 severe clinical disease; however, because no serological test is readily available, patients must und
71 HLH and B. henselae through liver biopsy and serological tests led to the patient's recovery.
72 r results suggest that both nucleic acid and serological testing may be needed to determine exposure
73                                        Novel serological tests may have prognostic value.
74 as increased the complexity of diagnosis, as serological tests may not distinguish between naturally
75 2 or worse in HPV-naive subcohorts; however, serological testing methods and the HPV DNA criteria use
76 we evaluate the performance of a new leprosy serological test (NDO-LID).
77                                              Serological testing of 25 (93%) of 27 patients operated
78                                              Serological testing of donors can identify patients who
79 e the amount of resources spent on exclusive serological testing of vaccines and make wide spectrum v
80                                              Serological testing, outer membrane protein A (ompA) gen
81 d economical microbead array-based multiplex serological test panels for veterinary use.
82                                       We did serological testing, PCR, and sequence analysis to obtai
83 mall subset (n = 14) had cat scratch disease serological tests performed.
84 f congenital toxoplasmosis and indicate that serological testing provides a promising method for geno
85                                              Serological test results for 451 patients with positive
86 on were determined by comparison to anti-HCV serological test results, alanine aminotransferase level
87                                              Serological testing revealed the presence of antibodies
88  nor specific, virological and type-specific serological tests should be used routinely.
89 ed by the use of cost-effective confirmatory serological tests, similar standardized tools are not wi
90 eved using standardized and widely available serological test systems.
91                        A simple and accurate serological test that is capable of detecting asymptomat
92                                           On serological testing, the polymeric material was shown to
93  is assessed based on changes over months in serological test titres.
94 rt can serve as an example to prompt earlier serological tests to identify the aetiology in similar c
95 usly documented, by clinical examination and serological testing, to have in utero rubella exposure d
96 the hemagglutinin (HA) glycoprotein, classic serological tests used by surveillance laboratories indi
97 stations and difficulty in interpretation of serological tests used to confirm diagnosis and evaluate
98 ng results are now available to Lyme disease serological test users and researchers developing novel
99 gy-Hepatology- Nutrition Department, and the serological testing was performed at the Lyon-Sud Hospit
100                                          HPV serological testing was performed using competitive Lumi
101 on (PCR) amplification of blood samples, and serological testing were performed to identify the infec
102                                              Serological tests were also used for diagnosing dengue f
103                                              Serological tests were conducted on 3698 swine sera, inc
104                  To diagnose celiac disease, serological tests were used, and duodenal biopsy samples
105  indicate that it may be possible to develop serological tests which predict the induction of unfavou
106                                              Serological testing with the detection of pepsinogen 1 (
107                                     Previous serological tests with KS patient sera have detected lyt
108                                              Serological tests with noninduced (latent) and induced (
109 etrospective studies, mostly on the basis of serological tests, with the problematic cross-reacting a
110        We performed electrophysiological and serological testing within 15 days of symptom onset on 3

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top