ライフサイエンスコーパス: smell

1 d high-frequency hearing and a keen sense of smell.

2 They also had an impaired sense of smell.

3 l animals critically depends on the sense of smell.

4 a protective measure regarding the sense of smell.

5 hemical sensors underlying the perception of smell.

6 adotropic hypogonadism and impaired sense of smell.

7 lls, and circuits that underlie the sense of smell.

8 small molecules leading to the perception of smell.

9 amic relay, if only to consciously analyze a smell.

10 common in animals that navigate by taste and smell.

11 is functionally irrelevant for the sense of smell.

12 this subsystem organization for the sense of smell.

13 in the kidney, mechanosensation, sight, and smell.

14 ic mechanisms may underlie our experience of smell.

15 ective states are influenced by our sense of smell.

16 le results in the perception of a particular smell.

17 may be associated with a more acute sense of smell.

18 guished people with normal and dysfunctional smell.

19 birds navigate freely without their sense of smell.

20 o REM sleep behavior disorder, and preserved smell.

21 est odorant but an otherwise normal sense of smell.

22 at is associated with life-long inability to smell.

23 e Western Hemisphere that locates carrion by smell.

24 l evolution was enhanced by ortho-retronasal smell.

25 ized more like subsystems for taste than for smell.

26 nd abnormal sensitivity to light, noise, and smell.

27 o artificial blends and even complex natural smells.

28 factory stimuli or avoid aversive tastes and smells.

29 ementia and controls for pleasant or neutral smells.

30 cteristic smoky, clove-like and vanilla-like smells.

31 nt and unpleasant smells but not for neutral smells.

32 se mixtures of odorants that have unfamiliar smells.

33 he treatment of AR in restoring the sense of smell?

34 he odor rewarded?) and identity (what is the smell?).

35 erlanus) or brown trout (Salmo trutta) (TMF(-SMELT) = 1.62, CI: 0.96-2.72; TMF(-TROUT) = 3.58, CI: 1.

36 human subjects underwent fMRI scanning while smelling 9 odorants that systematically varied in percei

37 In study 1, 45 student participants smelled a sweaty t-shirt bearing the logo of another uni

38 In study 2, 90 student participants smelled a sweaty target t-shirt bearing either the logo

39 fort subjects would expend to smell or avoid smelling a stimulus, patients with behavioural variant f

40 professionals have observed that feces often smell abnormal during gastrointestinal disease.

41 Yet, being able to smell adds a vividness and fragrant richness to life-and

42 With ~30 components, most mixtures smelled alike.

43 We suggest that this sensitive sense of smell allowed the turkey vulture to colonize biomes that

44 The sense of smell allows chemicals to be perceived as diverse scents

45 en attempting to identify an object based on smell alone, people often visualize the perceived source

46 ) genes constitute the basis of the sense of smell and are encoded by the largest mammalian gene supe

47 niques to deconstruct a complex natural food smell and assess whether olfactory salience is confined

48 s syndrome corresponds to a loss of sense of smell and hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism.

49 Aristotle's five senses, we know that sight, smell and much of taste are initiated by ligands binding

50 ough distinct molecular mechanisms to elicit smell and pain.

51 an be used in down-selection assays based on smell and quantitative fluorescence assays of the sample

52 AIA subjected to AD reported improvements in smell and reductions in sneezing and nasal blockade.

53 advances in our understanding of how taste, smell and somatosensation contribute to oral sensation a

54 Given the ubiquity of smell and taste and their importance to health, nutritio

55 in patients presenting to a university-based smell and taste center with complaints of olfactory dysf

56 taste tests of 581 patients presenting to a smell and taste center with varying degrees of olfactory

57 These families give insects the ability to smell and taste chemicals in the environment and are thu

58 tion, and that clinical associations between smell and taste dysfunction, when observed, likely refle

59 the peripheral neuroanatomy and function of smell and taste in this insect.

60 erable anatomical and functional homology in smell and taste pathways in all higher animals, experime

61 associated symptoms of "crude sensations" of smell and taste, an unusual epigastric sensation, chewin

62 The chemical senses, smell and taste, are the most poorly understood sensory

63 In contrast to sight, smell and taste, relatively little is known about the mo

64 The chemical senses-smell and taste-allow animals to evaluate and distinguis

65 neurotransmitters, as well as the senses of smell and taste.

66 nes, neurotransmitters, and senses of sight, smell and taste.

67 s in rodents that control the acquisition of smell and touch information, respectively.

68 hips between breathing and the sensations of smell and vibrissa-based touch.

69 the outside world, with rodents sniffing to smell and whisking to feel.

70 seat for psychophysical interactions between smells and sounds.

71 could detect OSPW using its olfactory sense (smell) and whether exposure to it would result in behavi

72 individual cages (though still able to see, smell, and hear other rats) as these rats can display be

73 on to their well-established roles in sight, smell, and mechanosensation, primary cilia are key parti

74 jects while they imagined sights, sounds and smells, and only during olfactory imagery did subjects s

75 We found that merely smelling androstadienone maintained significantly higher

76 hed from male to female [1, 2], we show that smelling androstadienone systematically biases heterosex

77 People able to smell androstenone more commonly reported odors as havin

78 In anorexia nervosa (AN), taste and smell are believed to be anhedonic, hunger and pain are

79 mimicking the mammalian senses of taste and smell, artificial arrays of cross-reactive receptors hav

80 CI, -25.6 to -10.6]; P < .001) and sense of smell assessed by UPSIT (LS mean difference, 14.8 [95% C

81 ally important difference >/=8.90), sense of smell assessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smel

82 All groups had similar scores for subjective smell assessment.

83 and then re-inspire the bubbles to carry the smell back through the nose.

84 ly changes in novelty-seeking, avoidance and smell before the progressive motor deficit.

85 The sense of smell begins with odorant molecules binding to membrane

86 nol avidity by, in part, making it taste and smell better.

87 )-intensity odor for pleasant and unpleasant smells but not for neutral smells.

88 ects, at avoiding what they preferred not to smell, but had equivalent success at obtaining stimuli t

89 We observe that these mice can smell, but odor discrimination and performance in associ

90 emic in sediment, water, sculpin and rainbow smelt, but nonracemic in the top predator, lake trout, a

91 ermined the resolution of the human sense of smell by testing the capacity of humans to discriminate

92 Both substances smell citrussy, fresh and floral.

93 (FFT) and 2-methyl-3-furanthiol (MFT) which smell coffee-like and meaty, respectively.

94 ly believed that humans have a poor sense of smell compared to other mammalian species.

95 fruity and floral notes while several earthy smelling compounds were developed as result of the infec

96 metry, with regard to the presence of earthy-smelling compounds.

97 During the unpleasant smell condition, extraversion was correlated with rCBF i

98 During the pleasant smell condition, extraversion was correlated with rCBF i

99 icals that are detected through the sense of smell contain unsaturated (double or triple) carbon-carb

100 In light of the early preclinical onset of smell deficits in many neurodegenerative diseases, the a

101 nk between these systems is that animals can smell differences in the major histocompatibility comple

102 res of perceptually similar odorants tend to smell different from their components (configural), wher

103 hereby demonstrating to us that nearby reefs smell different.

104 Smell dysfunction is a common and underdiagnosed medical

105 egenerative diseases, there is a spectrum of smell dysfunction ranging from severe loss, as seen in A

106 Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accompanied by smell dysfunction, as measured by psychophysical tests.

107 LL-R will be broadly effective in diagnosing smell dysfunction.

108 curred when the rats were allowed to see and smell each other through a transparent barrier.

109 olfactory information, even common household smells elude our ability to name them.

110 ten the result of a combination of different smells, emitted by several industrial sources.

111 The sense of smell enables animals to react to long-distance cues acc

112 e that topical steroids improve the sense of smell, especially in patients with seasonal AR.

113 By contrast, smelling estratetraenol systematically biases heterosexu

114 -8b knock-out mice show an impaired sense of smell, even though their motivation and mobility behavio

115 No two roses smell exactly alike, but our brain accurately bundles th

116 Clinical tests that evaluate the sense of smell face two major challenges.

117 rced to choose, I would give up the sense of smell first.

118 lity of defensive bunching and investigative smelling following playbacks of Maasai voices.

119 Animals that depend on smell for communication and survival extract multiple pi

120 e and even unique attributes of our sense of smell from the point of view of their bearing on and fit

121 that coincides with early development of the smell function, which is essential for pups to form pref

122 uality of the voice, appearance of the face, smell, gait, and posture.

123 us to dog-have made it possible to infer how smell has evolved to suit the needs of a given species a

124 enetic tools to study olfaction-the sense of smell-has brought important new insights into how this c

125 cts on behaviours linked to sensory stimuli (smell, hearing and vision) both having negative implicat

126 of physiological processes, including taste, smell, hearing, vision, and cardiovascular, endocrine, a

127 hat in a hungry state, participants chose to smell high-intensity versions of two value-matched food

128 the assumption that Cx. quinquefasciatus can smell humans and birds.

129 dysfunction in schizophrenia is unknown, but smell identification deficits (SIDs) exist in schizophre

130 ctory threshold levels, out of proportion to smell identification impairment.

131 nd 3.83 (95% CI 7.04 to 11.10), p=0.001, and smell identification scores were 35.61 (95% CI 34.03 to

132 We administered the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) to assess olfactory fu

133 olfactory function assessed using the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT), underwent magnetic re

134 administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and the Picture Identi

135 ssessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score (range, 0-40; hi

136 administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), the Mini-Mental State

137 with the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).

138 fferent measures: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test and Olfactory Threshold Sniffi

139 University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test data from control subjects (n

140 mparably with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in classifying subjects, and i

141 The worse Smell Identification Test scores in male patients were a

142 es demonstrated independent relationships of Smell Identification Test scores to social drive and int

143 ticipants, median University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores were 30/40 versus 33/40

144 Smell Identification Test scores, Wechsler Adult Intelli

145 accounted for almost 50% of the variance in Smell Identification Test scores.

146 The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was administered unirhinally t

147 nt differences in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, Unified Multiple System Atrop

148 ping task and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

149 using a modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

150 testing with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

151 To determine if the combination of smell identification testing followed by dopamine transp

152 Smell identification was also related to Wechsler Adult

153 mpared with upright positioning, but not for smell identification.

154 enome expression analysis to five coisogenic smell-impaired (smi) mutant lines and their control.

155 han in L41 expression is responsible for the smell-impaired phenotype comes from a phenotypic reverta

156 wo scrib null alleles fail to complement the smell-impaired phenotype of smi97B.

157 E mutant and several EP insert lines map the smell-impaired phenotype to the P[lArB] insertion site.

158 ert line with generalized sexually dimorphic smell impairment, smi97B.

159 The smell impressions, on the other hand, were quite consist

160 m-like, vanilla-like/sweet and/or clove-like smell impressions.

161 Here, focusing on the sense of smell in adult Drosophila, we show that Notch is activat

162 ne whether there are changes in the sense of smell in people undergoing recurrent head traumas.

163 endent on the mother expressing fear to that smell in pups' presence.

164 The olfactory mucosa, the organ of smell in the nose, is a neural tissue that regenerates n

165 The sense of smell in vertebrates is detected by specialized sensory

166 rgan (VNO), unraveled the molecular basis of smell in vertebrates.

167 in food flavors depends mostly on retronasal smell, in which food volatiles entrained into the airway

168 words independently of volume and pitch, and smells independently of concentration.

169 es, baseline age, University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT) scores, CSF amyloid - (Abet

170 Active sampling of touch and smell involves coordinated movements first observed in t

171 widely thought that locating the source of a smell is an ability best left to nonhuman members of the

172 Smell is an ancient sensory system present in organisms

173 The sense of smell is arguably our most primal faculty and also the l

174 Our sense of smell is based on a remarkable chemical-detection system

175 This smell is mainly carried by two small aliphatic diamines,

176 The sense of smell is mediated by GPCRs in the odorant receptor (OR)

177 The sense of smell is mediated by the olfactory epithelium, which is

178 Carrion smell is strongly repugnant to humans and triggers disti

179 ristic feature of human and animal organs of smell is the ability to identify hundreds of thousands o

180 The sense of smell is typically thought of as a 'slow' sense, but the

181 Smelling is one of the five senses, which plays an impor

182 Kallmann syndrome) or with a normal sense of smell, is a treatable form of male infertility caused by

183 ated exposure and even those who are able to smell it can lower their threshold with this treatment.

184 we express partially determine the odors we smell, it follows that each person may have a unique nos

185 ly perceived as a unified sensory object--a "smell." It remains unclear how chemical features encoded

186 ticular interest to investigate the sense of smell, its function on a molecular level, the signaling

187 In accordance with this heightened sense of smell, Kv1.3-/- mice have glomeruli or olfactory coding

188 al), whereas mixtures of dissimilar odorants smell like their components (elemental).

189 ongly associated with CRS cases who reported smell loss and facial pain and/or pressure and had the w

190 and/or pressure without smell loss; and both smell loss and pain/pressure.

191 The presence of smell loss and the pathological involvement of the olfac

192 symptoms: obstruction and discharge with no smell loss or pain/pressure; smell loss without pain/pre

193 scharge with no smell loss or pain/pressure; smell loss without pain/pressure; facial pain and/or pre

194 These data suggest that smell loss, per se, has no meaningful influence on taste

195 those at lower risk using proxies, including smell loss, REM-sleep behaviour disorder and reduced tap

196 ignificant number of patients who experience smell loss.

197 ressure; facial pain and/or pressure without smell loss; and both smell loss and pain/pressure.

198 ng based on what a fruit fly sees or what it smells might not involve distinct parts of the brain, as

199 do not dissolve plastic, are affordable and smell mildly like grapes, with three considered safe in

200 hormonal responses to food images, cues, and smells; mirror neurons that cause people to imitate the

201 mann syndrome; KS) or with a normal sense of smell (normosmic IHH; nIHH) are heterogeneous genetic di

202 Perception of the smell of a food precedes its ingestion and perception of

203 high accuracy and also reverse-engineer the smell of a molecule.

204 highly sweet, and/or fatty foods), like the smell of brownies, can elicit craving to eat and increas

205 ed by a loss of a behavioral response to the smell of ethanol and a blackening of the third antennal

206 Flies are attracted to the smell of ethanol, which partially mediates ethanol prefe

207 detect a life-threatening enemy based on the smell of its semiochemicals.

208 osmin, is responsible for the characteristic smell of moist soil as well as unpleasant taste and odor

209 ta suggest that worms sense the taste and/or smell of novel bacteria, which overrides the stimulatory

210 y aversion of Caenorhabditis elegans for the smell of pathogenic bacteria.

211 Thus, the smell of reefs could allow larvae to choose currents tha

212 Smell of success: Reagent 1 provides the dual readouts o

213 c bacteria induces a learned aversion to the smell of the pathogen, a behavioral plasticity that depe

214 a melanogaster larvae and adults avoid sites smelling of the main parasitoid enemies, Leptopilina was

215 can be endowed with the sights, sounds, and smells of its prior occurrence.

216 win proposed that the breeding season sexual smells of male crocodiles, goats and other animals, too,

217 Naive animals prefer smells of pathogens but animals trained with pathogens l

218 Among workers, individuals who reported smelling oil, dispersants, or cleaning chemicals had an

219 measure the effort subjects would expend to smell or avoid smelling a stimulus, patients with behavi

220 e chemical, such as a pheromone we detect by smell or taste, or it could be tactile, involving direct

221 , the perception of any two cues from sound, smell, or touch permitted males to detect and respond ad

222 ole food web TMF differed from TMF excluding smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) or brown trout (Salmo trutta)

223 Taken together, our data suggest that fish smell OSPW, that they may use this sense to mount an avo

224 natural odorants, suggesting that fish could smell OSPW.

225 ehavior, potentially enabling individuals to smell others' mouths and determine via olfaction what fo

226 mary olfactory (piriform) cortex as subjects smelled pairs of odorants systematically differing in qu

227 ucus in throat, nasal blockage, and sense of smell), patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

228 e OE of null mice, which exhibit a postnatal smell perception deficit.

229 lly used anticancer drug reported to distort smell perception in patients.

230 tients with focal brain injury indicate that smell perception involves caudal orbitofrontal and media

231 e inflow of information underlying conscious smell perception.

232 to the OB glomerular layer and the return of smell perception.

233 ated signs/symptoms: fever, dehiscence, foul smell, peri-wound erythema, hypotension, and leukocytosi

234 Rats rendered unable to smell persisted in displaying reciprocal sniffing behavi

235 Some DRY Arginine variants correlate with smell preferences in sub-populations and all 2,504 human

236 there is no systematic investigation of the smell properties of structurally related guaiacol deriva

237 evels of the hormone cortisol in women after smelling pure androstadienone (4,16-androstadien-3-one),

238 0.0001), hunger (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001), and smell (r = 0.53, P < 0.0001).

239 SMELL-R is a discrimination test in which the difference

240 SMELL-R showed significantly less bias in scores between

241 thy individuals, we predict that SMELL-S and SMELL-R will be broadly effective in diagnosing smell dy

242 sitivity (SMELL-S) and olfactory resolution (SMELL-R) that use mixtures of odorants that have unfamil

243 Smell recognition and taste detection thresholds were de

244 Differences for smell recognition and the 4 taste qualities were assesse

245 Smell recognition was unaffected by radiation.

246 toreceptor to span the visible spectrum, but smell relies on hundreds of distinct classes of olfactor

247 ults in healthy individuals, we predict that SMELL-S and SMELL-R will be broadly effective in diagnos

248 Because SMELL-S uses odor mixtures rather than a single molecule

249 nonsemantic tests for olfactory sensitivity (SMELL-S) and olfactory resolution (SMELL-R) that use mix

250 osure to alkaline chemicals such as ammonia (smelling salts) elicits severe pain and inflammation thr

251 sal congestion score (P = 0.01) and sense of smell score (P = 0.05) at 1 year and in the postnasal dr

252 It is accompanied by particular smell sensations, which are a basic source of informatio

253 Indeed, disturbances of smell, sleep, mood, and gastrointestinal function may he

254 than flower size or colour, suggesting that smelling stronger benefits reproductive success in P. di

255 es in the quantities of earthy-mushroom-like smelling substances as result of the infection process w

256 ill anoint themselves with a range of strong smelling substances including millipedes, ants, limes an

257 The main structural elements of biological smell systems are the olfactory receptors.

258 laboration and development of the electronic smell systems, the so-called bioelectronic noses.

259 ation as possible is required in relation to smell, taste and colour.

260 es and with mediating such senses as vision, smell, taste, and pain.

261 ceptors (GPCRs) mediate our sense of vision, smell, taste, and pain.

262 he patient can now breathe through her nose, smell, taste, speak intelligibly, eat solid foods, and d

263 n change the way we perceive sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and touch.

264 The self-reported intensity of chocolate smell tended to increase as identity accessibility incre

265 e bacteria are the major source of the musty-smelling terpenes geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol, which

266 prior familiarity with odor stimuli can bias smell test performance.

267 , appears to be correlated with quantitative smell test scores across a wide range of neurodegenerati

268 On average, smell test scores improved modestly over time.

269 o were cognitively normal at the time of the smell test, 33 died before follow-up and 167 were lost t

270 ick test (SPT), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), smell test, and peak nasal inspiratory flow were used.

271 logical rating scales, sleep questionnaires, smell test, and sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiova

272 Smell testing remains, however, a clinically relevant to

273 ubjects than conventional semantically based smell tests that need to be adapted to different languag

274 Smell tests were sent to 1065 participants.

275 e mammals generally have a superior sense of smell than males, but the biological basis of this diffe

276 and mediate many different social behaviors, smelling the body odor of a family member might constitu

277 er-sex behavioral decisions, in which a male smells the close proximity of a female as an indication

278 e high cost of transportation, an unpleasant smell, the risk of pathogens, and pharmaceutical residue

279 distilled water, so the rats could taste and smell them, or presented on disks attached to the tubes'

280 e tubes' metal spouts so the rats could only smell them.

281 , bitter, umami), retronasal olfaction (i.e. smelling through the mouth), and somatosensation (touch,

282 h time can be accurately measured, and that 'smelling time' completes the requirements for true olfac

283 y reveals how Drosophila uses their sense of smell to decide on where to lay their eggs.

284 Mosquitoes use their sense of smell to detect DEET, but there are currently two hypoth

285 that water shrews detect motion, shape, and smell to find prey underwater.

286 Pollinators use their sense of smell to locate flowers from long distances, but little

287 have a weakness: they utilize their sense of smell to target a human host.

288 ituation effects, allowing identity-relevant smells to maintain their intensity after repeated presen

289 There is a controversy concerning whether smelling via the nose (ortho-nasally) or the mouth (retr

290 Decreased smell was significantly more common in Sx + CT than in S

291 that localization information extracted from smell was then processed in a convergent brain system fo

292 orming these different associations with the smells we encounter.

293 fied beta-lactoglobulin the garlic taste and smell were barely perceptible.

294 stion, anterior rhinorrhea, loss of sense of smell, wheezing, and dyspnea) and on quality-of-life sco

295 Although they produce a characteristic smell when exposed to air, the compounds are detected by

296 y also help in masking the colour, taste and smell which currently limit its application as a functio

297 all of the senses, particularly the sense of smell, which is involved through odour images generated

298 vector is largely influenced by its sense of smell, which is presumably facilitated by G protein-coup

299 t to mimic the mammalian senses of taste and smell, which utilize protein-based receptors, we have in

300 es in the genetics and genomics of mammalian smell, with a primary focus on rodents and humans.