ライフサイエンスコーパス: thoracic artery

1 with similar mortality rates (right internal thoracic artery 10.3% versus radial artery 10.7% at 7 ye

2 rtery bypass grafting with the left internal thoracic artery, and who received a second arterial cond

3 terial conduits other than the left internal thoracic artery are seldom used in the United States.

4 Left and right internal thoracic artery (arterial) graft patency has been shown

5 tly onto the aorta or from the left internal thoracic artery as a T-graft.

6 Bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) have demonstrated superior pate

7 to compare survival after bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) over single left internal thoraci

8 We examined whether bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) revascularization is associated w

9 Those with internal-thoracic-artery bypass grafts (749 patients) were compar

10 f estrogen on NO release from human internal thoracic artery endothelia and human arterial endothelia

11 17beta-Estradiol exposure to internal thoracic artery endothelia and human arterial endothelia

12 Use of a second internal thoracic artery graft is advantageous in diabetic patien

13 A right internal thoracic artery graft offered no benefit over that of a

14 The positive effect of an internal thoracic artery graft on survival has been accepted for

15 the two groups, the presence of an internal-thoracic-artery graft was an independent predictor of im

16 The internal-thoracic-artery graft, which has superior patency rates,

17 outcomes in comparison with single internal thoracic artery grafting and should be considered as the

18 Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting confers superior long-term surv

19 Although bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with improved sur

20 Internal thoracic artery grafting of the left anterior descending

21 Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting should be considered in patient

22 ts underwent skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, of whom 748 were </=65 years o

23 me of patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.

24 roup) and 1548 to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group).

25 randomly assigned to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group) and 15

26 CABG to undergo single or bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting in 28 cardiac surgical centers

27 wound complications with bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting than with single internal-thora

28 ic-artery grafting than with single internal-thoracic-artery grafting.

29 on with radial artery grafts, right internal thoracic artery grafts were associated with similar mort

30 rable to reported patency rates for internal thoracic artery grafts.

31 ence between those receiving single internal-thoracic-artery grafts and those receiving bilateral int

32 henous-vein coronary bypass grafts, internal-thoracic-artery grafts conferred a survival advantage th

33 rafts and those receiving bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts with regard to mortality or the r

34 nly than in that for the group with internal-thoracic-artery grafts.

35 enthusiasm for the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries grew.

36 ere able to be revascularized using internal thoracic arteries in patients randomized to Y grafting v

37 The left internal thoracic artery is used to graft the left anterior desce

38 (CABG) with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) in their institution.

39 mine whether location of the second internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft used for bilateral ITA graft

40 ; stenosis was quantified for 7,903 internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts and 20,066 saphenous vein g

41 saphenous vein grafts compared with internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts.

42 ears was 19.0 +/- 0.2% for the left internal thoracic artery (ITA), 25.0 +/- 0.2% for the RA, and 55.

43 Internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) are frequently anastomosed to t

44 bypass surgery using the bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) as bypass grafts.

45 ond arterial conduit after the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) for coronary artery bypass graft

46 e study sought to determine if left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafting of the left anterior des

47 g (MAG) vs the standard use of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) supplemented by saphenous vein gr

48 artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the left anterior descending a

49 l grafts) patency was 85% and right internal thoracic artery (n=15 grafts) patency was 80% (P=0.6).

50 score-matched recipients of a right internal thoracic artery (n=1576) or a radial artery (n=4290).

51 ed a second arterial conduit (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery, n=5866) or a venous co

52 s compared with the use of a single internal-thoracic-artery plus vein grafts.

53 Bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization did not increase the n

54 Bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization grafting confers no in

55 complications compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) revascularization.

56 acic artery (BITA) over single left internal thoracic artery (SITA).

57 n its proven survival benefit, left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending (LITA-LAD) g

58 s was primarily limited to the left internal thoracic artery until the mid-1980s, when enthusiasm for

59 tion, extent of disease, and use of internal thoracic arteries were recorded.

60 val and freedom from reoperation over single thoracic artery with saphenous vein.